this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
136 points (94.7% liked)

Ethical Consumerism

105 readers
1 users here now

A place to strategize, plan, execute, and support each other in reducing reliance on unethical consumer goods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t know about y’all, but I will not ever be going shopping here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 120 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kroger promises to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after artificially inflating them by $3 billion.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh, so just like their normal “sale” items.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

Prices are probably skyrocketing as we type in preparation for this "massive" amount of savings.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

This item is $9000, but if you let us track your purchases and give us all of your personal information, it's $3.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 87 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 months ago

Literal blackmail. Agreed

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

More like extortion.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would anyone trust them right after the price gouging during the pandemic and long after logistics had adapted?

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

That’s the neat part, we don’t.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago

Fuckin lies.... No for profit business ever said hey let's spend a bunch of money to buy another business to make less money.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 months ago (5 children)

They aren't even saying that.

After the merger closes, Kroger will invest $1 billion to lower Albertsons’ prices, consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation and providing value to customers.

So, they're going to invest $1 billion to lower prices (which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain").

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Which they already claim they actively do in order to lower prices

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation

LOL, fucking what? They're literally one of the major causes of inflation.

which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

Oh, so firing more people, adding more self-checkout lanes, charging more for bags, and extorting distribution centers so they also have to fire a bunch of people?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

That just sounds like sourcing lower quality food stuff to save their bottom line

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 2 months ago
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago (3 children)

"You should let us reduce competition in the grocery space, because with less competition prices will be lower."

That's a bold take.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

$omething tell$ me it will probably $till work though.

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Walmart has been doing it for decades to achieve its low prices. The problem isn't that it won't work, it's just still a shitty thing to squeeze every cent from your suppliers.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Wal*Mart does definitely squeeze their suppliers, and it does have relatively low prices, but it's hardly a charity. It squeezes suppliers, not so that it can supply customers with low prices but so that it can provide profits to investors.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Economies of scale do allow for lower prices. Problem being, monopolies do not.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Economies of scale allow for lower costs, not lower prices. Lower prices are a choice that companies make, and it's a choice they don't have to make if they don't have competitors.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You didn't lower prices when you put in self checkout. Don't piss on me and call it rain.

[–] Krono 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Self checkout did lower the prices if you play the game right.

For example, one time I had 2 donuts in a bag, but I rang them up as just 1 donut. Please dont tell the cops.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If I see you stealing food, no I didn’t.

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I wouldn't snitch even if I saw someone walking out with a wagon of money from the store safe. Fuck corporations.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

How did two donuts become one donut though? Are you a wizard?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I always seem to lose count when scanning the same item repeatedly. I'm sure I got close to 12, and that's close enough.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

This is where we're at now, corporations are issuing demands to the government, and the government is appeasing them.

[–] Rivalarrival 5 points 2 months ago

Sounds like extortion to me. Revoke their licenses to do business until they replace their C-suite.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Those blackmailing fucks can go to hell

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

No that sounds an awful lot like extortion. That's a crime you know.

[–] technomad@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 months ago

'improving their services'

=

extracting more value from their consumers

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 14 points 2 months ago

Do it right now then.

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 months ago

Force them to break up into all their constituent companies.

Competition and the free market, also free of M&A's, will help pricing for everyone, including suppliers and customers.

Be great if we could elect anti-merger reps.

[–] iflyspaceships@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Darth Kroger after the merger: "I have altered the plan, pray I do not alter it further"

[–] Quexotic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

First they added self checkout to reduce headcount, then came the price fixing/gouging. Then their shrink increased because people got tired of being fucked by Kroger. Then they had that shady deal with the UFCW. Then they decided to treat everyone that shops there like a criminal.

I'll never return.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

They have a concept of a plan to lower the prices.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someday, maybe soon, you won't have a choice but to shop at a Kroger grocery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

“Sure, Jan.”

[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

I’m glad I have other options where I live.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Ok. But your tax base is tripled and we set price ceilings on certain goods.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

And then immediately raise them 5x a week later

[–] DynoNoob@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yes. If there's one thing that all corporations want, it's to MAKE LESS MONEY.

That's why they want to reduce competition. It's so people can give them less money.

Now, some people might suggest that this sort of selfless generosity might go against their fiduciary obligation to increade stockholder value. But those people would be wrong because of course they're only doing this to eliminate competition and gouge customers, you bunch of gullible idiots.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

*terms and conditions apply. This offer is subject to change after one year of operation

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Plans change

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

If they take them over and can't fix Albertsons ( supply chain inefficiency is what I've been told), then the whole organization is gonna go under within a few years.

That almost sounds like a good thing, but I know that it wouldn't be .

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah sure they will.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I thought "bidenomics" inflation dictated prices?? /s

?????

So it really is corporate greed then

(I know it's corporate greed, but I wanted to counter all the naysayers that say the price of groceries is strictly because of inflation)...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›