this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
157 points (98.2% liked)

news

23649 readers
466 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 25 points 2 months ago
[–] GnastyGnuts@hexbear.net 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If Kamala Harris loses to Trump, will it be more or less embarrassing than Hill-dawg's loss? Probably has to be worse, right?

[–] FungiDebord@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no. Hillary faceplanting was embarrassing because of how unexpected it was; it's understood that Kamala very well may lose, there's just no way it can be embarrassing to the same degree.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

hillary-contempt having a ceiling of balloons ready to drop down for her supposedly imminent victory and those balloons never dropping was quite a moment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TomBombadil@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

I say worse absolutely. Trump is at like 10% power. He is a dry dry boy these days

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gucci_Minh@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago (10 children)

How the fuck are there still undecided voters, you'd think everyone at this point would have already cemented their opinions but it seems like there's just a good third of the USA running purely on vibes.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm somewhere between "I'm worried Donald Trump will come for my hormones and force me to destransition" and "I want to see the democrats destroyed"

[–] someone@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago

I'm wondering if polling companies are quietly bundling "none of the above" with "undecided".

[–] Parzivus@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

I mean if you're the average American voter and your only care is "will I benefit more economically under Trump or Harris" the answer isn't immediately obvious. Anyone who's a single issue voter on Palestine doesn't have a super straightforward choice either, although I imagine most of them will vote third party or not at all.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago

Exactly, I don't really think there are a lot of people who are undecided. People aren't voting on individual issues anymore, there are two competing narratives regarding what the future of US should look like, and people either subscribe to one or the other. Anybody who is going to vote for Harris was already going to vote democrats regardless of who the candidate is because they think the republicans are destroying the country, and vice versa.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are no undecided voters there are just liars and lonely people who think surveys count as human interaction.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cool democracy when like 7% of the total population of the entire country determines the outcome of federal elections.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago
[–] nothx@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago
[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I don't believe the American people are good enough to reject genocide, but I'm willing to be proven wrong.

Oh, and how is Nate Silver still around? I thought the humiliation of 2016 should have made him crawl under a rock to hide forever

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

Its been the democrats election to lose since swapping Joe out for Kamala, and i'll be damned if it doesn't look like they're trying.

[–] pumpchilienthusiast@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago

rust-darkness time is a flat circle

[–] miz@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago
[–] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

Kalamity Harris is upon us. jokermala

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

Liberal media don't want you to know this one trick that keeps them all in business...

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›