this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
704 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

10853 readers
3273 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 101 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Feel like a good sponge costume would allow you to pee right where you are.

[–] MrShankles@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I got the "Robert Sponge Rectangle Slacks" version from Spirit Halloween... but it doesn't hold water when pissing myself :(

Should probably come with a warning about that. Pretty disappointing.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 81 points 5 days ago

I guess it depends on what kind of sponge, but I think in all likelihood since most sponges have no symmetry that this comes down to the same politics as an agender person choosing a bathroom.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 52 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Flounders are not bilaterally symmetrical.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 94 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

YOU'RE NOT BILATERALLY SYMMETRICAL

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

He can't understand you, dude.

Hey,

Flounder!

You'

re no

t bila

terall

y sym

metri

cal!

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a little hard to pick up, but it's all about one rule: Everything has to be on one side of the page.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

Ah, thanks, I really don't speak flounder too well. Really should learn considering how close to Norway I live

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

In the tree of life, flounders are a sub-sub-...-sub-species of bilaterally symmetrical animals: https://www.onezoom.org/life/@Holozoa=5246131?otthome=%40_ozid%3D1&highlight=path%3A%40Apionichthys_finis%3D3640785&highlight=path%3A%40Bilateria%3D117569#x2913,y-2310,w8.2796

Edit: let me preemptively be a pedant to myself and say that "sub-...-species" is wrong because "bilaterally symmetrical animals" is not a species. Flounder is itself a species AFAIK, not a sub-species of anything. It is a descendant of the common ancestor of all bilaterally symmetrical animals. There, now surely no one will find anything to be pedantic about :D

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I appreciate that information. However, flounders themselves are not bilaterally symmetrical. I have caught many dozens of them and it's pretty easy to tell that they are not.

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Flounders are born symmetrical; eye migration happens as they transition to the juvenile stage of growth.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

Oh, I know. It's very interesting. But when people imagine a flounder, they generally don't imagine a juvenile unless juvenile has been specified.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Isn't it referring to during development? Like as they're forming, they are bilateral? I haven't taken developmental biology in many years, so I'm maybe wrong.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

They're only bilateral when they're very young. And even then, everyone is just focusing on the eyes. The body of the fish is also not exactly bilateral. Just fillet a flounder of any age (or watch a video on it) and you'll see.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They are born (or hatch too lazy to look up) and their eyes move later once they get larger.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah. I just wasn't sure at what point things are considered to be bilateral or otherwise.

I thought it may have been during the development process, but can't remember.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 8 points 5 days ago

Just like starfish!

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Forego the illusion of species and families. It's taxa all the way down.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 18 points 5 days ago

It depends on whether it was a larvae or not.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 5 points 5 days ago

They're "differently symmetrical."

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 5 days ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Pretty sure from my B- in zoo that sponges eat from what amounts to our waste hole.

So you are supposed to piss in the punchbowl and drink from the toilette.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They are a single orifice kind of animal. Take a gulp of sea water, sift oit the goodies, and expel the rest

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Yeah. ok. See what kind of biological insight a B- gets you?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago

Toilette du fromage.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 4 days ago

What about phylum neutral bathrooms?

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What if you take off the costume? Humans aren't entirely bilaterally symmetrical (at least not on the inside) and obviously not radially symmetrical so the paradox continues.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is any animal perfectly bilaterally symmetrical?

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] MrShankles@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Their mom definitely got it... Slam! with the alley-oop!

[–] Chiarottide@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Might be, but she gives it to everyone else

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
[–] jack@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

Humans are definitely bilaterally symmetrical. Symmetry doesn't have to be a perfect mirror image in biology.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 9 points 5 days ago

Echinoderms:

[–] harl3k1n@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago

TIL sponges don't do punctuation.