this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
172 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For anything like debt relief, or any kind of social program, the qons - and the "liberal media" - always ask, immediately, and with pikachu face: "but how are you gonna pay for it?!!!111"

I hope you remember, people who "felt poor" because of the price of eggs or whatever....there is endless amounts of money to spend on deporting people, but if anyone were to talk about helping YOU, well, to borrow a phrase: FUCK YOUR FEELINGS, there is no money for something like that, no sir!

Also, you can BET that some of donvict's friends will be making money from this "plan":

Some folks are born, silver spoon in hand Lord, don't they help themselves, y'all But when the taxman comes to the door Lord, the house looks like a rummage sale, yeah

I mean, it sounds like they did ask how much it would cost, he just bulldozed through the question instead of seriously engaging with it and legacy media is too chickenshit to report it as "Trump apathetic about costs of deportation plan" or "Mass Deportation to Cost Billions Despite Trump's Claims" because putting the things he says in context makes him sound like the madman he is and apparently truth is no longer sufficient defense from defamation.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 109 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yesterday’s headline was about Latino voters choosing Trump for economic reasons.

No price tag.

[–] intresteph@discuss.online 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He didn’t mean them though, just the other minorities. He knows who voted for him……..

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

oh the stupidity

Meanwhile musk still hasn’t been deported for being illegal 20 years ago like that guy. Sounds about white

[–] intresteph@discuss.online 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whaaaaatttt? How could that happen???!!!!

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

You'll have to speak up. He can't hear you over the leopards.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yes, that sounds bad. But how else should we decide who to deport? How could we decide who is a "bad immigrant"? Maybe they get citizen status and then we realized they are also a criminal? Should they then also be deported? A US citizen? Maybe yes!

I only see two solutions:

  1. Directly deport every foreigner, no matter if anyone thinks they are good or bad
  2. Deport everyone who ever got sentenced because of anything. Independent of their citizen status. This might include a lot of people that are thought of as American, but almost nobody is originally from here. And this way we clearly get rid of all the bad people.

(/s, just to be sure)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The ones that can vote are all here legally. Of course some will be caught up in the dragnet anyway, but nobody told them that in so many words. They think it'll only affect others.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There are only like 2 million "illegal" Latino immigrants here. Trump/project 2025 wants to denaturalize 25 million Latinos. That would certainly include people who were born here and/or who can legally vote. Trump has stated he wants to get rid of birthright citizenship.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wait, he's going to strip citizenship as well?

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yes, that is explicitly the plan in Project 2025.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good thing journalists are only asking the policy questions after the election. Not that it would've mattered for the result, but still.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Well, they had a horse race to run.

Also: bOtH sIdEs!

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trump in 2 months: "Mass deportation is too expensive, so we need a final solution"

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 week ago

“Trains? Can’t we just use garbage trucks?”

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Drink Bleach 2: Final Solutioo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yet healthcare for all is too expensive. Not cruel enough ig

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Brown people might get it, too, so we cannot have nice things.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Haven't been paying attention? Unless it's the BEST, BIGGEST or FIRST, the American mind can't comprehend its existence. They'd be literally the last to do healthcare, boring! But the FIRST to evaporate their economy with the BIGGEST mass deportation in history, now that's something the BEST nation can get behind! /s

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

First thing i thought of too 🥂

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“And you know, I’m not somebody that says, 'No, you can’t come in.' We want people to come in."

“We just want them to leave again unless they think and act and look just like us.”

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Another famine in Ireland, maybe?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So it is going to be incredibly expensive to remove immigrants and... err.... reduce GDP? This is the man America trusts with the economy because something something tariffs something something eggs

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Well, buckle up, because it gets even stupider from here on out. This same policy genius thinks Elon Musk is so gooodest at doing bidness like Xitter, that he should be in charge of "cutting waste" in our government, or something.

[–] Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On top of the money that goes in to social security from migrants that cant withdrawal it. And the taxes we get from them in general

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Well he’ll probably try to kill both Medicare & Social Security so he’ll see it as a net positive…

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

who wants to bet that there is, in fact, a price tag for his mass deportation plan?

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I'd even wager that each time he mentions the cost it will be higher than last time. I suspect it will be measured in the billions and will increase 2-4 billion each time he talks about it. By the time it finally begins to get enacted, I'm guessing the estimated total to ship them all out will likely run in the hundreds of billions.

[–] intresteph@discuss.online 26 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Do you think maybe I could be “deported” to Canada in a way that Canada would have to accept me immediately?

[–] Foreigner@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I recommend anyone living in the US in the lower end of this chart to carry your papers or at least a copy on you at all times from now on.

[–] zarp86@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume they will bother looking at the papers.

[–] Foreigner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Fair, but on the off chance it does help, you might as well take that precaution.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It will eventually be paid for with crypto TrumpBux mined by mandatory Neuralink brain chips.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Your idle Tesla is now mining TrumpBux. Remain motionless to update Neuralink

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Because Mexico's gonna pay for it, right? What a brain.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Why are we all in shackles?

load more comments
view more: next ›