this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
884 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump’s re-election has fueled a surge in misogynistic, homophobic, and racist rhetoric among young men, reportedly emboldened by the president-elect’s history of inflammatory remarks about women.

In schools, boys have been caught using phrases like “your body, my choice” against female peers, prompting districts like Minnesota’s Hopkins Public Schools to issue warnings to parents about harassment.

The impact extends beyond schools, with activists on Texas State University’s campus displaying signs asserting that “women are property.”

This hostile climate has left many women feeling unsafe as a new far-right administration takes power.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 274 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Remember that 53% of white women voted for this.

They voted for them and all women to be considered property.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 month ago (4 children)

College-educated white women backed Harris. All college-educated groups did. Maybe Democrats should work on making college more affordable, and accessible to women with small children. Frankly we should anyway. We should also start helping girls that get pregnant in high school finish with their diploma so college will be an option in their future. Especially since more of them are going to be forced to carry the pregnancy to term.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 86 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Maybe Democrats should work on making college more affordable

Why do you think the wingers reacted so much to having loan forgiveness? Anything that educates more people is something they fear. Having people not being saddled with crippling debts after school only sends a message to others that maybe education is a path for them. The wingers don't want an educated citizenry.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, the gop has weaponized anti-intelectualism. The reds won't vote for a candidate that wants to make college affordable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unfortunately no one hates women more than other women.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Article filled with examples of men expressing hatred and misogyny towards women

"Ayup, no one hates women more than other women!"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] neoman4426@fedia.io 145 points 1 month ago

Wow, the guy who bragged about how he sexually assaults anyone he finds attractive, talked about how he had the same "on the younger side" tastes as his best friend Jeff, talked about how he liked hosting beauty pageants because it gave him an excuse to walk in on girls while they were changing, etc emboldened other people to act the same way? Utter shock. This could never have been anticipated

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 107 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bruh, I hate this timeline.

I feel like I accidentally triggered some portal and walked into a TV show / movie.

Nothing feels real anymore.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It was December 21st 2012. The Mayans were right. A timeline ended and were falling into some clown mirror black hole ever since or something.

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I thought everything went crooked the day Harambe died

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

Tbh, for me, I’m realizing it’s triggering a sort of sea-change in terms of how I, as a citizen, want to interact with American society.

Laws, ethics, human dignity and empathy clearly aren’t important to people here. Money and power are. This is fully incongruent with my personal beliefs in a variety of fundamental ways. I’ve tried to aim my career at areas that are going to help better society - that’s a big part of why I work at an oncology-focused biotech now. But like… I’m faced with the realization that this country just doesn’t share my values, and doesn’t actually care that I willingly take markedly less compensation than, say, working at Meta, and it’s primarily because I want to make the world a better place.

I admit it’s starting to feel like an abusive relationship. I don’t think the world is going to become a better place in my lifetime. It’s going to get a lot worse in a lot of ways. My initial reaction was to begin taking steps to just fully fuck off from this country, and find someplace else with a society that hasn’t fully eaten itself. Try to keep my sanity and ethics in one piece by finding a new society to call home that’s not America.

But I ALSO have begun to realize in the last couple days that there’s another darker path I could take that denys the society I’ve honestly come to resent pretty strongly the my true capabilities and abusive consumption of my efforts: Malicious compliance. I could just fully jettison my ethical guidelines and engineering principles and simply min/max the absolute fuck out of comp and just retire early. Work for Meta or OpenAI or some health insurance company or whatever the fuck is the absolute most lucrative job I can find and just fully shoot for leadership metrics, not really fucking caring about the toxicity of the management class, the morale or well being of my team, the impact my work has on society, the quality, reliability, and integrity of the code I ship, or any of that ivory tower crap I’ve previously held as crucial elements to my profession. Stop trying to move the needle in the right direction. All gas, no brakes. If this country is determined to not give a fuck, why should I? Why shouldn’t I try to get to a place in my career where I can just retire, or do whatever I want without worrying too much about the personal consequences, because I can just fuck off at my own discretion due to money?

And the second, darker option has the added benefit that I wouldn’t have to essentially abandon my family here, who are definitely not considering moving away as seriously as I am. My parents are both not in the best of health; maybe I should try to at least spend some more time closer to them before I just fuckin leave - or at least, as long as I can stand it here before the “fuck off and leave” route is truly the only viable option.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 102 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anybody who's surprised should take a deep look in the mirror. You bitches elected a literal rapist into the white house. This is the "great" leader republicans rally behind!

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Rapist, terrorist, moron. The trifecta. We're literally living in the worst timeline :/.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, economic anxiety. That's why racism and misogyny.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But they felt poor! That's what is making them so rapey and weird! I mean, eggs cost what, $100 each now?

The thing is: Biden and the Democrat Party made them this way!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maga is not sending their best. They're bringing crime. They're rapists.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're absolutely sending their best.

The problem is what they're best at is being Maga assholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 74 points 1 month ago (11 children)

the america the majority of americans want. sickening

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Now we have both the middle east and the middle west

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

*Majority of voting Americans

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The proper response to "your body, my choice" is "your nuts, my knee."

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The correct response is "If I'm going to jail because abortion is murder, I may as well kill my rapist"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Calm down, everyone. Remember, both sides are the same. Harris would have been absolutely no different.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 month ago

Hmm maybe enabling these people was a bad idea

[–] lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

20% of Americans voted for him because he told them it's ok to be a rapist.

Chat, are we fucked?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, I'm afraid this is not just a "spike", per se, but more like a prelude to much worse, including not just threats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, the "I do not want to vote for the lesser evil" crowd was literally saying the misogyny out loud for all to see.

[–] chillinit@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Those of good conscience running in fear from orange stupidity didn't understand why others of good conscience were digging trenches: You can't outrun stupid. We fight or we die.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Cue restrictions on the freedom of movement of women. To "protect" them, of course.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Dude literally said he was gonna “protect” women whether they liked it or not. I took him at his word, but clearly a lot of women didn’t.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Expect women to start cutting dicks off.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Great, now I'm going to have to start punching school-children.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LilDestructiveSheep@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Whats even more worrying.. that doesnt come just from somewhere. This kind of thoughts existed before.

I am really worried. This is taking an ugly turn quite fast. I'm so sorry..

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (7 children)

At least all these undatable men are outing themselves so publicly.

Start making a list ladies!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How sad due to the internet, this is spilled over to the younger generation.

statistically younger generations tend to skew more liberal. Now we know why Musk bought Twitter propaganda.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Isn't this kind of shit that you guys have the 2nd amendment for?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

women shouldn't need to kill people in order to live in the US. And their assailants almost certainly also have access to firearms because, the US (either legally or in violation of red flags etc).

people shouldn't need to kill just to go about their fucking lives.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

Tbh, this is all a fucking distraction from the class war that the oligarchs are winning without competition. And what a distraction it is! The cure to all these ills is higher taxes on the wealthy, but I don’t think any of those reforms are going to be remotely possible now lol

load more comments
view more: next ›