this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
805 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9914 readers
201 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
805
Car brain energy. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 155 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Reminds me of the last time I was in Texas and somebody called the cops on me because I didn't have a car

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's why I typically bring 2 cars when I go to Texas.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

One in your luggage, one in your carry on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 76 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it says a lot about Texas that you aren't the first person who told me they had the cops called on them for not having a car there.
My cousin went there as a foreign exchange student, and she lived a mile away from the town center. So she walked, cause it's less than 20 minutes.
Then a cop car stopped beside her. First they were friendly, asking if her car broke down. But when she said she doesn't have a car, and is walking, they actually took her in for questioning.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't they need to charge her with something in order to do that?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's the Welcome to Texas package.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 36 points 1 month ago

Crime: Being in public while poor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 133 points 1 month ago (5 children)

me and my homies using the drive thru

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 15 points 1 month ago

Fred Flintstone the place up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nobody158@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

I dunno. I get plenty of drugs from Uber drivers and there's less paperwork and they deliver them right to me. . It's not a terrible alternative really.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Insane*

*applies to america only, may have severe side effects such as latent brain problems, diminished capacity for thinking and lethargic behavior (amongst other symptoms).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I genuinely thought this was a joke, fake or satire.

My European mind can’t comprehend.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

North American in a nutshell

1000017386

[–] Emerald@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago

Why can't the European mind comprehend hell?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 59 points 1 month ago

No.

stands in drive through

Get absolutely fucked and then give me my God damn meds.

Also, stop violating the ADA.

Highly illegal.

Thanks.

[–] Steve@communick.news 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So a bicycle would be fine

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't understand why just walking up is apparently not fine

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Zidane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Insurance. Or at least that's what the manager at starbucks said during the pandemic.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

Well I hope their windows are also insured in that case

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've been to many places where they close the interior and only do drive thru.

Sometimes they will be completely ok with you just walking through the drive thru on foot.

Almost always any other cars that show up will have people inside who will act terrified, like you are completely insane and may at any moment attack them.

Even though they're the ones that just almost ran you over.

[–] midnight_puker@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How the fuck is this acceptable?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is not. Welcome to the fossil fuel dystopia.

[–] midnight_puker@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I don't like it here.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is what happens when a society agrees that to be part of it you need a car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

We used to order drive through on our skateboards.

Recently I walked to a drive through, and they refused service because I didn't have a car at the time. (Their inside was closed).

Guess I know where never to eat again.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I promise that the workers don't give a shit. They're not paid enough to care.

But they're being recorded 24/7 and if management sees them serving people who do not have cars in the drive thru, it'll be someone's ass.

Back in the day, cameras pretty much only existed for the cash register and entry/exit areas. Now, they need to put in laws to keep the companies from installing cameras in bathrooms... That shit is fucking everywhere.

The corpos at the top are mandating that anyone in the drive thru must meet a minimum requirement of a "vehicle" which cars and bikes are (at least in most places), but you, on foot, are not.

This is just them trying to avoid getting sued because you were standing in the drive thru waiting for food and some inattentive fuck pulls in after you've ordered and runs you down. It's really fucking stupid.

The idea that I think they were originally thinking is that people who are walking should go inside where they are reasonably safe from being run over to order/pick up/eat, then they started to keep the drive thru open later than the dining area, and here we are.

I get that they need to clean and whatnot, so they want to close the dining area, and that's fine, but close the dining area and leave the counter open so people can walk in and get take out FFS. It's basically just one strip of flooring that customers will walk into and out from while the seating area is closed, so not a big deal to run a mop over it and go home after closing time.

But nobody said corpos made sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago

I would 100% stand in the drive through and hold up traffic till they gave me my prescription.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Places that require a car for the drive thru are just leaving money on the table. I never understood that.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is entirely a corpo policy to limit liability. The idea, as far as I understand it, is that they want to prevent people from standing in the drive thru since that carries the risk of them being hit/injured/harmed while waiting in the line.

Its literally a problem because corpos don't want to get sued for an idiot driver gassing their way through a drive thru and mowing someone down.

Honestly, given how lawsuit happy many people are, I'm not terribly surprised. What does surprise me though, is that they don't have a walk-up window in a pedestrian safe area. I guess the logic is that the pedestrians can just go inside, but when the drive thru is open late, after the dining/walk in area closes, you end up with stupid situations like the OP.

I hate corpos.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I'd assume they want to discriminate against people who are too poor to have cars because they think those people are more likely to be difficult customers, and since most people have cars they don't lose much business by doing this.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jomn@jlai.lu 27 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I think I already have trouble understanding why a pharmacy has the need for a drive through

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I hate this community because my instinct to most posts is to downvote until I remember the OP is laughing at it, not with it. I guess that's where the 10 downvotes come from.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do you need a car to use the drive through?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColossalCoder@fedia.io 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that be discrimination?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but it's not illegal discrimination.
Pedestrians aren't a protected group, and neither are poor people.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

People who can’t drive because of a disability are.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I can’t imagine this would stand up to an ADA claim in the US. Forcing a person who can’t drive due to a disability to pay an extra fee to pick up medication in a vehicle instead of just fucking handing it to them is stupid.

[–] maxalmonte14@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

So they basically saying you should buy a car if you want some meds, or at the very least rent one.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

They should put a courtesy tricycle beside the entrance.

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

I used a bicycle in a Walgreens pharmacy drive though for the whole summer, and then one day a manager told me they won't serve me there anymore because of "safety reasons".

What they meant was for their safety, from liability, like if a car hit me.

I don't use Walgreens for prescriptions anymore.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

I'd pretend to be driving an invisible car.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

If you have to close one, why not the drive through? If you make people come in, they might remember they need to buy something else

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Because let's say you're the only person who showed up to work today. Trying to fill prescriptions puts your back to the rest of the store, maybe even takes you behind shelves. Makes it easy for you to get held up. Also shoplifting but I'm more concerned about your safety. With the drive through, you can give desperate sick people their prescriptions, and people who want other stuff can get it elsewhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›