this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
291 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2162 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

A 74-year-old who is dying of cancer was chosen over a 35-year-old rising star at the insistence of an 84-year-old woman (who is currently undergoing hip replacement surgery) just months after an 81-year-old Presidential candidate was forced to drop out of the race because he showed sever symptoms of cognitive decline during a debate. If this were a satire about a gerontocracy, I would think it was too over the top.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And a 78 year old is president elect

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, if we're talking Republicans too, don't forget that the 82-year-old Senate minority leader, who has had mysterious freezing spells this year, was hospitalized for a fall just last week.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are you talking about this? The guy who has cancer?

https://lemm.ee/post/49960079

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In my original comment, yes, he is the person with cancer I'm referencing. In the comment you're replying to, I'm referring to Mitch McConnell, who suddenly froze mid sentence during a press conference.. Twice.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

The state of politics is truly terrifying.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

talking about?

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That does it for me. I'm changing my voter registration to independent. This party no longer represents me.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I did mine the day after they lost to trump again. This party needs to die so a real oligarch opposition party can take it's place.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

As a young voter, I've always been Independent because I knew Democratic party was shit.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunate, but it'll give her more time to work with Bernie and labor leaders to organize a general strike

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

They will never let her. She'll get the Bernie treatment time and again.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Let's not forget that AOC voted to protect the rail corporation from a union strike.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

kindly take your scarecrow to another field.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 198 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I’m glad congressional Democrats are finally taking steps to deal with their sclerotic, ineffective and increasingly out-of-touch leadership and building a future with younger—oh wait.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The thing that made me so pessimistic about the future of this country was when I learned that the people who advised Hillary's 2016 campaign were still advising Harris' 2024 campaign. They failed multiple times and the consequences have been catastrophic, but they held on to their positions anyway. I have no reason to think they won't be back in 2028, because the people who have a say in who gets party leadership are people selected by the old leadership. We need a borderline hostile takeover of the Democrat party, and after Trump did it to the Republicans, the existing powers in the Democrat party only entrenched themselves further.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

The mayor from Jaws 1 was still the mayor in Jaws 2.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 137 points 1 week ago (29 children)

Shit like this (Pelosi putting her thumb on the scale) is why people are questioning if they'll ever vote Democrat again.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

AOC runs several investigations that lead to results.

Connelly... Is old and has seniority.

Great fucking job Democrats. Getting my seat warmer ready for ~~2022~~ 2026 already!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (53 children)

AOC should abandon the Democratic party. She should join Bernie as an god-damned Independent.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 101 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She and Bernie should start a progressive party.

I'm tired of Democrats bowing to oligarchs.

[–] SilentFury@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

I read that as Democrats blowing oligarchs... Same feel tho

load more comments (52 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Everyone sort of made the case that they would be the best to help change the message across the country. ... He's a very good communicator," said Beyer.

Oh yeah that's exactly what's going to fix the problem Democrats have. Electing another old ass Clinton era Democrat to a position of power. It's not like everybody's pissed at them for losing the Presidency, the House, and the Senate all in one go.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

See it from their perspective. They are doing their hardest to be as useless as possible and people still vote them.

At this point, how pissed everyone is matters jack shit because they know their public loves outrage for the sake of outrage, and the very same public that votes them, is totally neutered and incapable of choosing or voting for anything else

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are using the fact that people can't go anywhere else and are weaponising that to do absolutely nothing.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

They have played their voter base for absolute fools

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 64 points 1 week ago (5 children)

AOC loses key vote in House Oversight race to Gerry Connolly

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (6 children)

an Old. White. man.

Seriously. It's pissing me off; more so the republicans doing it. we need minority voices. We can't expect the republicans to do it- lets just be honest here. and I doubt very much if Connolly will be able to push back nearly as much as AOC can and will. (never mind, whether or not he's willing.)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 week ago

HEADLINE: AFTER SEVERAL BEATINGS, DEMOCRATS LEARN NO LESSONS

More the stupid us for thinking things would be any different this time.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 47 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Cool a 74 year old, that’s the life expectancy of a male in the US.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Senatorial class lives 10-15 years longer than their working counterparts. This is also true outside the US.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›