this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
731 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27159 readers
3176 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes, but only in one direction and if you use UDP instead of TCP. Also your MTU needs to be small enough for the packages to fit between the blades of the fan, otherwise that causes package fragmentation.

/s

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 20 hours ago

No but if you fill the room with water then it should be way faster

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, but the tailwind becomes a headwind on the way back to the router so you won't see any actual speed changes. Putting a fan on both ends will cancel each other out too.

You need to change all the gaseous air out for either liquid or a solid as waves propagate faster through them. You should start with filling your house with liquid oxygen as a nice half step so you still have something to breathe easily, as solids are a bit more tricky.

[–] svenkw@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The general idea is correct, but since we're dealing with electronagnetic waves, they travel slower in any medium. So pumping out all the air of the room would technically make your wifi faster.

Liquid oxygen has (I think) a refractive index of about 1.2, so it would make the signals 20% slower (still very fast)

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Dude waited 11 months of lurking and not posting or commenting anything, and breaks their silence with that attractive string of knowledge. I've got mad respect for them.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm a nerd too but come on, he's replying to an obvious joke with high school physics. There are more layers, do you want a more pedantic teardown?

  • Most likely, the "Wi-Fi speed" the Reddit poster needs to improve is the data rate, not latency.
  • The data rate can be improved significantly by increasing RSSI with a better physical setup, WDS, higher power etc. However, if the rate is too low at full bars, the bottleneck is the ISP plan or hardware specs.
  • The latency cannot really be improved without changing hardware or software, as the highest impact one can influence is in processing by the router and device. Some settings such as DNS cache size can improve latency in some cases with some downsides.
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Meh, we all have our personalities. A lot of people hate my personality, but I just figure it's best to assume everyone on the internet is a stranger that could be a potential friend. If they answer things blunt or love to extrapolate with excruciating detail... Who am I to judge. I just make jokes and hope they don't accidentally make someone feel bad. Like I really wanted to reply to yours saying that you were just trying to show off and get me to call your words attractive as well ; ) haha.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

What if i put the router in front of an open window, open the window behind my computer and put a fan between the two ?

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No, the fan will blow the packets all over the place, which is fine for UDP, but any TCP/IP connection will suffer. Place the fan in front of the router so that the blades will catch any dropped packets and throw them back into the datastream.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

uh, hi. If you place the blades in front of the router, it will start chopping the packets before they even reach. You need to use an bladeless fan

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Alright so I've now got a router using cell signal hardwired into a Roomba randomly roaming the halls so everyone gets shitty connections all the time.

[–] piper11@feddit.org 2 points 23 hours ago

No need, that's why we have the Don't Fragment bit in the IP header

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Everyone know that.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 141 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Yes, but then it's slower for your computer to talk back to your Wi-Fi, so it ends up cancelling out

[–] KryptoSynth@ani.social 81 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 minutes ago

Full duplex airflow signal enhancement

[–] ToyDork@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

RoRo stations. Roll on, roll off/out. The internet isn't a highway, it's a series of bullet trains in tube tunnels.

I wonder if anyone thinks OpenTTD would be more fun with a cyberspace theme? I know there's a neon grid grf (mod)...

Anyway, if this was a suitable solution for WiFi, we wouldn't need wired connections. That said, you can cut open a drink can to turn a WiFi router's signal into a focused beam using the aluminum, iirc.

[–] Lag@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We can streamline this by making the room into 2 small tunnels from the router to the PC. This way there will be less obstacles in the room. But we need to add leafblowers on each side with a boost button.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What if we make the tubes really really small and wrap them in many protective layers to prevent other wind sources from messing with the signal.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interestingly, this could be true and you could never find out experimentally iirc.

I watched a veritasium video about the 1 way speed of light vs 2 way that talked about it.

[–] antimongo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I watched the same video!

I was right about to disagree and type “wait this only applies to light” but then I remembered: radio is light.

Crazy to think about that!

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It is nuts. It goes to show how far science goes proving things through deductions rather than direct observation. So much science is done that way.

I think that there would be some infinite energy glitches if it was actually true that light was faster 1 direction than another, so I think the assumption is a good one. But still fun facts

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] smokebuddy 159 points 2 days ago

^yes^ but ~pages~ will ^render^ kinda ~wavy~ i ^use^ a ~box~ fan ^myself^ for ~maximum~ speed

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not 1 way traffic. Signals go both ways. To increase your wifi speeds, have 1 fan blow from your router to your device and 1 fan from your device blow towards your router. Signals go faster in warm air so make sure to pump up the thermostat. It also goes faster with less CO2 in the air so make sure to open all windows (unless you own a Mac). Lower moisture in the air also improves speeds, so crank your AC on max. Also placing both your router and device in rice helps.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

device in rice

Say that in any linux forum :)

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you can create a vacuum with said fan, it can be faster.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe if you made this vacuum encapsulated in a line. Surrounded by shielded metal and plastic.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Wifi isn't waves made of air, the wifi is waves of the electromagnetic spectrum, similar to visible light, and they travel faster than you can perceive.

So no.

But you can do something similar with a microwave oven. It's just that any signal making it through the radiation of the oven would be disfigured and useless.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, that was my first thought... but would there be a measurable difference?

I mean lets be clear, with a fan you're adding like 8 mph to something going 299,792,458 meters per second. You won't notice anything.

But like, vacuum vs glass vs glass moving half the speed of light, could be an interesting what if. Relativity is always where my mind glosses over in physics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sort of a serious answer because I'm bored: You're thinking of speeding up the air when what you should be thinking about is speeding up the waves. But then your waves are reaching you plenty fast already with latency being in the single digit ms range. Not much of a point in trying to accelerate that, really. You won't notice anyway.

If you feel like your internet connection via Wi-Fi is slow then the bottleneck is probably not with the Wi-Fi part of your network but the Internet Access Point behind it. Or even further down the line.

Now this is based on the assumption that you are in a fairly typical network environment, i.e. using semi-current hardware with moderate, if any, electromagnetic interference in the area. If you're living right next to a high voltage transformer station and using a router from 2008 then, yes, you're going to have Wi-Fi performance issues.

But in most cases, people complaining about "slow Wi-Fi" are actually suffering from Internet connectivity issues.

Think of it this way: If you enjoy your McDonald's from the local franchise but you can only get 100 burgers per hour from them (of course you need MOAR!) then upgrading your 320hp Camaro to a 400hp Mustang is not going to enable you to pick up appreciably more burgers from the drive through in the same amount of time.

[–] Jezza@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not entirely true.
In an apartment in the middle of a city, noisy neighbours can be a problem.

In those cases, it's best to jump to 5 GHz, and leave the 2.4 band alone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tyrefyre@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, but it evens out since now your messages going back to the router have to swim upstream.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (11 children)

There are some stupid questions.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Tbf, it’s not like physics stuff is always obvious, especially when dealing with relativity or quantum mechanics. It just feels obvious if you’ve already learned about the research that’s already been done.

It isn’t even remotely intuitive that light should have a max speed that can’t be added to by moving its source relative to other things. Plus, light does interact with matter, but it can only be slowed down by it.

So less a stupid question and more just one that isn’t educated about something.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

On the contrary, given the premise its a smart observation from an unknownledged person.

“Wifi is waves in the air” is very very wrong but as it appears it’s what this person was thought to believe. Given that they trust this information the conclusion makes perfect sense.

The only “dumb” here is whoever explain wifi like this to them.

So what the post really amounts to is. “I applied actual reasoning to the information i was provided as fact and my conclusion seemed strange, so i will ask on no stupid questions to figure out whats really going on”

More intelligent than the majority of internet users.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is not stupid at all. If Wi-Fi used matter instead of magnetic fields to propagate (like sound waves), a fan would affect it. Understanding magnetic fields is anything but intuitive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Not inherently stupid question; they just don't know that radio waves don't travel through air but through space.

[–] onnekas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

What is space exactly?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Yes but you have to put a slit in front of it so the wifi waves turn into wifi particles.

[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember: These people vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Depends on the direction the fan is facing. If it's blowing towards you, that increases air pressure in front of it, which means more things for photons to interact with and a lower speed of light, thus slower wifi. Away from you would decrease the pressure and result in faster wifi due to the increased speed of light. Theoretically at least. I don't think this effect is measurable.

Edit: thinking about it, the electromagnetic noise from a fan motor would likely be worse than the benefit. You might even be able to detect that

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you had a fan blowing out the window, it could slightly reduce the density of the air in your house, leading to a tiny increase in the speed of light through it, so that would make the waves technically faster, but by a vanishingly small margin

It wouldn't increase the bitrate of your router at all, so it wouldn't make a difference, but the waves would be faster

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›