this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
282 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2235 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe we just dont have oligarchs in government, yeah?

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can't just D³ all the oligarchs.

(this is a challenge, I want you to but I can't just say that.)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If we got rid of all the oligarchs, we'd barely have anyone left.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago

You son of a bitch, I'm in

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me n the boys with our pocket guillotines

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

... Is that an AI generated thing or an actual physical item?

I love the gag, but if someone actually made it I assume it has an actual use and the things that come to mind that would fit in that hole frighten me.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like a straight cigar cutter to me

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

ah, that makes far more sense.

[–] GreenAppleTree@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mel Brooks had a gag in one of his movies where he was a rabbi who carried a pocket guillotine.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It's called an ITAR violation, and it's probably more than just EV parts.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The sad part is, that allowing Elon to export "Full Self Driving" or whatever other technology to China won't even help Tesla that much, and will even harm the company in the long term:

The Chinese will just copy/steal the technology, because all foreign investment is through joint ventures with local corporations, and give it to their domestic manufacturers, like they did and continue to do with all other offshored production that winds up in their hands.

As a recent spate of articles about GM, Honda and Nissan, tells us, the Chinese domestic manufacturers now own 60% market share.

Tesla's market share in China has dropped in nearly half over the last 3 months from 9/24 - 12/24, from 6.43% to 3.39%, and that was already down from 9% in 2023.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

FSD isn't the leader in the market anyways and faces significant problems right now because they abandoned radar to focus on cameras.

So China likely already has that tech...

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, you don't understand. FSD can't be copied because it'll be entirely server side, and hosted in the USA!

Hope your ping times don't spike while making a left turn in a busy intersection.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

No doubt running on starlink.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

Have never heard that and doubt it is true.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bit off topic maybe but isn't Teslas self-driving setup the worst of all implementations? I'm no expert but i thought the cars only used cameras and other companies were closer to full autonomy (though none have achieved it)

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 10 points 1 day ago

FSD is less reliable compared to say Google's Waymo. GM's Cruise gave up on autonomous driving

China's dubious state media, says their autonomous robotaxis are quite safe, and they're rolling out fleets of them in major cities already

But I'm sure that bits and bobs in Tesla's FSD systems have some value to someone.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago

Critical support for comrade Musk in his protracted struggle against Sinophobia.