this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
157 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3192 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk’s $288M donation to Trump’s campaign has secured him influence, including a leadership role in DOGE, which aggressively cuts federal programs.

While their alliance is built on shared disruption and anti-“woke” policies, tensions could rise as Musk’s unchecked power draws criticism.

Musk serves as a useful foil, deflecting attention from Trump, but could become a political liability, fueling concerns over who wields real power.

Pressure from Republicans and critics like Steve Bannon may force a reckoning before the midterms.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Probably before the year is out.

Two man-children who want attention more than oxygen both occupying the same space is a recipe for fallout.

They'll break up soon. And we'll find out how much we all have to suffer for it.

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I think referring to President Musk constantly will speed things along.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

I wonder if, back in Germany 1940's, there were articles like "How long will hitler and goerings relationship last?"

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 64 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Here are some steps to take that I think will be both interesting and entertaining.

  1. Every time Trump says he wants to do something, ask him if Musk approved of this plan.
  2. When Trump makes an appearance, ask him(before any other questions) will Musk be coming as well?
  3. Any time Trump says “I know what I’m doing” or “Believe me”, we should ask, “Does Musk believe you are correct here.”
  4. at least 3 times during a press briefing ask, “Can we talk to Musk for more specifics on this…”

This will really drive Trump nuts, and hopefully end this weirdo man-love relationship of hate and political power.

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I've been publicly referring to "President Musk" and "First Man Trump" and hoping it catches on. The more we can make Trump feel like there's a perception that he's not in charge, the more it will piss him off, and hopefully cause him to clash with Musk.

I don't even necessarily want him to fire Musk. I want them to try to do conflicting things, give in to their nature to be contrarian, but with each other.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

First Buddy feels appropriately diminutive.

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 9 points 13 hours ago

No they won't. Even as self interested pricks, their interests overlap far too much for them to ever have a real fight. The richest man in the world paired with the (ostensibly) most powerful? They both want to weaken the power of average people, keep us uneducated, keep us too tired and sick and busy to question the status quo, and deregulate our economy. Their pairing is the most bald-faced bribery possible between corporate and political America, and they will never stop benefitting each other as long as people as self-absorbed as MAGA are in power.

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 49 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I think they've collided already and Trump lost.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

I'm not sure if he lost or won. I remember even before the first term started he was shopping around for a VP that would actually do all the presidential work while he just took credit. This seems a lot like that. If things are unpopular, scapegoat Musk or some lackey. He burns all his subordinates.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 6 points 17 hours ago
[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 12 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Better if both are destroyed and only JD Vance remains who, having no influence or money, is ignored in the 2028 elections.

[–] CriticalThought@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I was under the impression that JD Vance enjoys the financial support of Peter Thiel et al.?

How Peter Thiel and Silicon Valley funded the sudden rise of JD Vance

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 points 15 hours ago

vance is the proxy of the oligarchs. He was added to the ballot specifically to give them and project 2025 a direct voice.

musk IS an oligarch and has a long history of actively screwing over other oligarchs. His interests partially align with project 2025 but he is mostly there because he used twitter to win the election for trump.

In a world without trump? it becomes a question of whether vance is more afraid of everyone but musk or musk himself. And they are fully dependent on musk, zuck, and fox news to control public opinion because people actually don't want the majority of project 2025.

In a world without trump AND without musk? vance is worthless. He has no charisma and most of the stranglehold on social media is gone. The moment he does anything that impacts a red state his approval is down in the toilet.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It seems to me like Trump can't reign him in any more. Whether that's because Elon has dirt, because Elon has effectively stolen the bully pulpit, or because Elon has the Joe Roegan crown, it's at least clear that Trump is biding his time hoping the Elon chaos will present an opportunity to covertly regain power, but as it is there's nothing in sight. He's opened the government to more corruption in the first week than Grant's entire presidency.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 9 hours ago

Trump doesn't have a reason to reign in Musk, yet. Musk is the tip of the spear to making changes per Project 2025 and gives Trump plausible deniability when Musk breaks things.

[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because any further dirt on Trump would matter at this point....

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

I was thinking something along the lines of it being obvious that without his support he wouldn't have won. Trump usually just says stuff but that one might ring hollow if Elon had more of a voice to refute it. Trump tends to only pick fights he can win with his audience, he learned his lesson about the vaccines that there are at least a few things they won't follow him into.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think that it will last as long as Musk wants it to. Trump spent years spewing his idiocy across Twitter for years. You can bet he was spewing the most damning stuff in DMs. Musk, having bought Twitter, now has every DM that Trump ever sent on that platform. Trump is not smart. He certainly sent things he shouldn't have in those DMs. I would be completely shocked if he hadn't sent DMs that included evidence of criminal activities by him or others. I'd be shocked if he hadn't sent classified information to other via Twitter DMs. Musk now has all of that dirt on Trump and the resources to use it if he chooses to.

I find it hard to believe that Musk spent between a quarter and a half a billion dollars to get Trump in office just because he loves Trump "as much as a straight man can love another man." I think he knew he had leverage on Trump and would be able to use it to do absolutely anything he wants. Now Trump is stuck with Musk because if he tries to dump him, Musk can suddenly find some of those DMs and drop a few tens of millions to make sure Trump gets roasted over it in the media and even in Congress.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We already know that Trump has done all of those things. There is no possible information that could be revealed about Trump that would make his cult turn on him. That much is certain.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No, you and I know he has done many things. The MAGA cultists only know what their right wing media sources are telling them. Everything from a left or middle news source is all "fake news." Musk has the financial resources to poison the well they are drinking from by getting Fox, et al to run endless stories about Trump's corruption and incompetence.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's an interesting posit that's for sure. On the one hand, he could " stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody" and not lose any voters. On the other hand, Musk is one of the only people with the access and resources to really mount a propaganda campaign against him. It's a bit of a stand off, we don't know what conversations have been had with Putin either.

edit: a word

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 8 points 19 hours ago

In the next season of "Who Wants to Be a Trillionaire".

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

the lack of trump blowing musk memes is disappointing

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, I'm okay not seeing that. Though the time cover, with a tuft of his hair, and shoes sticking out from the side of the desk might be tame enough for my eyes