this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1737 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

13995 readers
2883 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Really wish talking about what shrimp see didn't remind me that in farming them females have one eye removed to promote breeding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyestalk_ablation

[–] Sedathems@mander.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

I am eternally gratefull the practice is forbidden in Europe in organic cultivation. It's one of the small wins that fly under the radar. It's still a long way to people choosing for organic, awareness is the start of every change.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 20 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Technically, all the colors are fake. They're just the halucinations of a brain trying to understand the input from sensory organs.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

That doesn't make them fake, in the same way that x can mean 2. You are merely representing a given value (in this case light within a certain electromagnetic spectrum) in a useful way.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But is my red the same as your red? Hmmm?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

if two people can both point to red and agree that it's red, that's close enough. anything beyond that is just pointless esoteric debate.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Some people see numbers instead/along with colors, and different people see different numbers, so I guess the colors might be different between people too

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree that it's pointless. I think it may be beneficial to humanity (eventually) to establish whether or not there is an objective reality which we all experience.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

i agree, but that's a job for neuroscience, quantum mechanics, and psychology; not a pack of dorks on the fediverse.

[–] Sedathems@mander.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

it's more in the philosophy ballpark, which shapes the interpretration of methodology and the consequences, in my humble opinion.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But what if the dorks on the fediverse are scientists?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

then by all means

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But I want to contribute to humanity in a meaningful way!

-me, a dork on the Fediverse nearly incapable of contributing to humanity in a meaninful way

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

Working on it.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

I hadn't thought about it that way.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, colors are real. And you see them.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Pink isn't real. There is no wavelength of light that is pink.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Its bright red, maybe toward purple! Brown is dark orange.

Light frequencies between blue and red don't exist.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I don't think of it as drama so much as docucomedy.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine how OP their colour perception would be if they did have that mental processing power

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Oh that explains this scene

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

I hate that it invalidates this episode of radiolab, which is, without a doubt, a masterpiece of podcasting:

https://youtu.be/jibvu9BHV_k?t=795

i saved the video at the 13 minute mark where they do the audio representation of the vivid colors. still worth a watch/listen

[–] Wizzard@lemm.ee 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But compared with human eyesight, they could still see more 'colors' - As we see (almost) the same white in incandescent bulbs as LEDs and fluorescents, they might actually see the component colors and their intensities.

Not unlike how we may hear a combination tone when multiple other tones are played, and hear the difference (or sum) of them.

[–] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How would you suggest they do that. White light near equally activates our 3 cones because all spectrums of light are in it.

White light near equally activates all 12 shrimp cones because all spectrums of light are in it.

Which spectrum of color is left out of white light that wouldn't light up a cone associated with it?

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

6500k vs 5000k is noticeable for humans

[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I need to use wherewithal more in my daily life

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Every lunar month, when there is a full moon, i try quitting caffeine

werewithdrawal

(I initially misread you comment)

[–] ouRKaoS 8 points 17 hours ago

I wish I had the wherewithal to use it more often.

load more comments
view more: next ›