226
submitted 7 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 69 points 7 months ago

Transportation officials also said the total cost of Buttigieg’s flights on FAA planes up to that time was about $42,000. Chao took 15 FAA flights early in the Trump administration, and the cost of just one of them, which was international, was nearly $69,000, the Post reports.

It's good both are being investigated, but definitely seems like Pete's isn't that big of a deal compared to what Republicans do

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 85 points 7 months ago

I’m not convinced it is a good thing that both are being investigated if the investigation into Buttigieg is just political smearing. HRC’s emails show the cost of abusive investigations. Investigations aren’t cost free, either monetarily or in terms of public trust in institutions. It implies he did something worth investigating, and devalues the seriousness of real investigations, like those against Trump.

When the review was announced, Buttigieg had flown on FAA planes 18 times out of 138 flights for official trips since becoming secretary early in 2021, according to The Washington Post. He takes commercial flights most of the time, and when he uses FAA aircraft, it’s usually because it’s cheaper than commercial flights, a Department of Transportation spokeswoman said.

This does not seem to be something worth investigating.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 27 points 7 months ago

devalues the seriousness of real investigations

The only thing people like Green or Jordan doing Congress is distract, distract, distract.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Now do Greene!

(Ew that came out wrong. Don’t “do” crazy, folks!)

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 9 points 7 months ago

As usual, republicans try to make democrats doing something normal seem like a huge scandalous deal while they and their sleazy-ass media hyenas entirely ignore what “their side” did or does.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 59 points 7 months ago

The House Republicans truly have zero intention of doing their job or serving the needs of the country.

[-] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Still can't figure out why their voters either don't see it or don't care.

Like at least prior to trump you could kinda see it but now you just have to be in outright denial of reality.

[-] thatgirlwasfire@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I believe they are convinced stuff like this helps them somehow

[-] init@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

By tearing their opponents down, they are comparatively better off with no actual gain

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 41 points 7 months ago

I wonder if MTG has actually ever done anything for her district. She's spending all her time with all these petty, childish antics. What a loser.

[-] joker125@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Spoiler: she hasn't.

[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

Because they have absolutely nothing better to do. /s

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

Because"their goddamn jobs" is such a foreign concept.

"nobody wants to work anymore."

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

That would be retaliation and illegal.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

How is that not a bill of attainder, accompanied by in-depth media confessions that it is in fact a bill of attainder?

FYI, a bill of attainder is legislation that imposes punishment on a specific person or group of people without a judicial trial

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

I cannot wait until she falls into obscurity. Old and wrinkled sitting at a lonely table at a flea market gun show to sign photographs and nobody is paying her any attention.

[-] Cyyris@infosec.pub 25 points 7 months ago

How about maybe pass a fucking budget instead of wasting time and money on this bullshit.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

But all the Republicans have is performative garbage.

And this is definitely performative. The salary change would need to go through the Senate and there's no way this passes. The House Republicans know this. They just want to "own the libz" by saying they'll reduce some salaries to $1.

It's easier than actually doing work.

[-] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

What do you mean? They are. If we stopped paying Pete we'd have the current US debt payed off in about 149,052,132 years. Maybe add a few hundred thousand years for interest but I don't believe that's significant.

[-] leadore@kbin.social 17 points 7 months ago

I think she's upset because "Secretary of Transportation" has the word "Trans" in it and she got confused.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 17 points 7 months ago

She's going to make such a great washed up loser in a few years.

[-] MellowSnow@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago
[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Oh, she can go down from here, my friend. Let's watch together.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I mean, fuck Buttigieg, but this is a pretty dangerous precedent.

Edit: c'mon people. He didn't do anything after the East Palestine disaster, he makes excuses for why we can't have high speed rail or even just a better Amtrak, and he hasn't done anything to reduce car centric design. He's the god damn secretary of transportation.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

he hasn’t done anything to reduce car centric design

In all fairness, this doesn't really fall under the purview of the Secretary of Transportation.

I think most urban design and planning happens at the local level, and the federal DoT is mostly responsible for allocating funds to state and local city governments.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And I think it's not hard to argue that he did quite a bit towards reducing car-centric design as a mayor. Mayors have WAY more control over that stuff, in general. The DOTs are the DOTs. They're going to be conservative and they're going to waste money. They also don't really follow federal marching orders.

Biden/Buttigieg have pushed for more Amtrak investment than has happened in a long time, though, along with proposals for further expansion for local rail and BRT service. Just a typical case study in a progressive failing the leftist purity test.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

That's fair. I'm willing to concede that he doesn't have a major part to play in reducing car-centric design, though I think he could create general guidance for cities to follow

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

He's a McKinsey man...

The vast amount of issues with capitalism in our country can be traced back to young idiots in their 20s working for McKinsey telling CEOs the best thing they can do in any situation is layoffs is raising CEO pay.

They've also worked for pretty much every evil organization, including the Saudi government

John Oliver just did an episode on it a few weeks ago.

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

It sucks that legitimate critism of democrats makes you sound like unhinged MAGA lunatic. Not that it's ever really gonna be a choice between fascism or their bebal incompetent feet dragging corruption, just a sad reality of our crappy two party system.

[-] havocpants@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

just a sad reality of our crappy two party system.

As an outsider, it looks like the US only has a one party system now. One party and a group of spiteful, contrarian fascists trying to overthrow its democracy.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 7 months ago

As an insider, I can confirm that assessment is pretty accurate.

[-] joker125@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I mean fake outrage is fun?

At least go after the correct boogeyman.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

They should do that with the gop ans republicans, after all they get their money thanks to bribes and companies paying them to legislate in their favor

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Damn did someone tell her what transportation means or...?

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Good way to spend time as a political representative

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 6 points 7 months ago

These are not serious people

[-] brblitz@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Isn't that less than minimum wage?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You cannot pay people less than minimum wage.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago

Public employees are exempt from the NLRA and it is not abnormal for an independently wealthy public sector employee to accept an appointment with a $1/yr wage. Also not covered are air/railway workers (who are covered under the RLA), agricultural workers who have some very weird and problematic coverage, and certain domestic workers/contractors for... some fucking reason and with some effect.

Never underestimate how much of a shithole the US is for labor.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
226 points (96.7% liked)

politics

18069 readers
3980 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS