this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
835 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

69770 readers
3829 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 60 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

“Up to”…… here’s 5% off

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 27 points 15 hours ago

Very true. I'm giving you up to* 1000 upvotes.

[–] nous@programming.dev 330 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

Yen also pointed out how such a court decision could help cut inflation in the US, too, "by dropping the price of a significant chunk of digital purchases by 30% overnight".

I bet most companies will just take that extra 30% as profit rather than giving it back to their users like proton has.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 31 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, Proton is bucking the obvious trend, with this one. Most companies will totally take the profits rather than lowering prices.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 71 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah, even of the companies don’t pocket the difference, he’s an idiot to suggest that this will cut inflation.

This guy is just not very smart, I think.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 101 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think he’s a salesperson trying to sell the idea that getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

I mean that's not wrong. I had no idea Apple was double-dipping like this. I wonder if Google is doing the same thing...

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 41 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Every store does this. Even Holy Valve

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

What? Since when does Valve prohibit companies from redirecting customers to non-Valve purchasing flows? Because that's what this ruling is about, it says Apple can't prohibit apps from telling users to go buy off-platform for lower prices. Valve isn't doing that with Steam afaik, actually I'm not aware of any other platform that does this

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

Valve will even allow developers to create their own Steam keys free of charge and sell them wherever they want with no commission whatsoever

That’s pretty open I’d say

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Any of the video game console companies.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (6 children)

Every company who takes a cut from in-app purchases, be it subscriptions or DLC, should be kneecapped by this ruling.

It's one thing for the hosting marketplace (App Store, Steam, Play Store, etc) to take a cut from the initial purchase of a game/app. But it's a whole other issue for that initial marketplace to keep reaching further into the dev's pockets and take a cut from in-app purchases unrelated to where it was originally obtained.

[–] Greercase@lemmus.org 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though. That way apple never gets a cut because the "purchase" is in-app. Pay to be listed (maybe tiered depending on downloads) seems fair especially because it doesn't incentivize people to do scammy things with pricing. It's already a fee anyway.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though

Welcome to Android lol

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago

"This app is Free!"

*opens app*

"Psyche! Get your credit card out..."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Here comes the Steam defenders.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Or he's just shitting on other companies who he knows are too greedy to do the same. Proton is getting positive press for this and he's leaning into it with a bit of hyperbole

Not saying he's a genius or anything, he's just a spokesperson doing spokesperson things

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago

Companies that were app-first like mobile games probably won't cut prices much if any. Companies that were web-first like Proton and Patreon probably will.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] philycheeze@sh.itjust.works 120 points 23 hours ago (17 children)

Do he still think fascism is good for small businesses though?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I got a Proton two-year subscription that averages out to two dollars and change per month.

I already feel like I got an incredible deal.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it -2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Too bad the owner of Proton supports Trump, so when my two years subscription ends, I'm moving to Tuta or Posteo

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 70 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Cool! Still not gonna put all my eggs in the fascist-sympathetic basket

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 84 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

If they can charge 30% less without Apple's fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don't buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn't change it then:

Because Apple literally tells people that they're not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago...

[–] patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se 26 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Some things do charge different amounts though. YouTube Premium for example is more expensive if you subscribe in iOS but maybe that’s just because it’s Google.

They also could have just not let anyone subscribe through the iOS app. Lots of things do that.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve noticed this too, there’s no consistency. Some companies seem to get away with two prices, others not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is the same on most platforms. You'll rarely find a product for different prices in different places because if they're listed on Amazon, Steam, Apple, Google, etc. they're not allowed to.

[–] Buelldozer 18 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

That isn't exactly true with Steam. Valve does allow a dev to offer a discount at a different store as long as that same discount comes to Steam in a reasonable amount of time.

Straight from the docs:"It's OK to run a discount for Steam Keys on different stores at different times as long as you plan to give a comparable offer to Steam customers within a reasonable amount of time."

[–] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

That's probably only for selling steam keys on another store. You might be able to sell non steam versions for any price you want

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago

Because Apple prohibited that.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Likely they were not allowed to by the terms they agreed to with apple.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Most favored nation clause. Apple gets the lowest price that you offer. I'd you offer any discounts elsewhere, that have to be the same on the app store

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not exactly 30%. For sales below $1M, it's 15%: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/

In Europe, where this was established last year, they started charging a Core Technology Fee to cover the cost of hosting and data transfer: https://developer.apple.com/support/core-technology-fee/

And if you switch payment providers, you have to pay at least 2.5% plus transaction and any intermediary fees.

It's nice that Proton is offering a discount, but for everyone else there may be additional ongoing costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 38 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No doubt Proton’s CEO will use this to justify his “Trump is better for regulating big tech” claim, while ignoring the fact that the judge in this case is an Obama appointee.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This the trump-licker? Yeah, bye Proton.

Buh bye now

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Thundermail is coming soon. By Mozilla.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 15 hours ago

That's the best name by far! Well, I guess second, compared to Thunderbird.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›