If you can’t win, cheat. - GOP philosophy
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
302 points (97.5% liked)
politics
19097 readers
4916 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
if that doesn't work. whine and cry like little babies, then cheat some more.
Prichard, who has previously called on conservative states to "put into code that Jesus Christ is King and dedicate their state to Him,"
That's all you really need to know right there. Just another Christian Nationalist fuckhead trying to rally the ~~heard~~ herd* of angry rubes.
I think you mean "herd"
Apparently I too am a rube when it comes to spelling first thing in the morning 🌄 🙃 😅
More a supremacist than a nationalist at this point
A Republican state representative in North Dakota has urged authorities in Ohio to "ignore the results" of Tuesday's election
So it's an idiot from some other State trying to tell Ohio what and what not to do. Gotcha.
They did that in South Dakota when they voted to legalize recreational Marijuana. The governor used a single-subject technicality and anti-mariuana geriatric judges agreed. Then two years and millions of dollars in smear campaigns later they had a rematch that soundly defeated recreational use when it was voted on again.
Rep. Brandon Prichard (R-ND)
Direct democracy should not exist. Case-in-point: Ohio legalizing the slaughter of babies. It would be an act of courage to ignore the results of the election and not allow for the murder of Ohio babies. We are probably 10 years away from this opinion being acceptable though.
So just to be clear, Republican Congressmen are saying that they have a 10 year plan to do away with democracy?
The use of the word "allow" here betrays his real belief, that he thinks he is in a position of power to rule over his constituents and decide for them what they are allowed or not allowed to do.
I was thinking even worse, that he's making a call to action for his fellow "patriots" to take things into their own hands.
GOP, has been becoming more radical every year. Soon they'll have martyrs like Muslims.
they've had them for years now, it's rhetoric like this that creates lone wolf terrorists
We'll be back to "pro-life" extremists murdering doctors and patients... to save lives of course.
Democracy is when I vote and my accepted result happens.
And also when I allow a vote that I am able to “undo” when my preferred result does not happen.
I really hop you're trolling, because you're letting out some pretty crucial parts here.
Democracy is also when you vote and your voted-for result doesn't happen. More than 40% of the state just had that experience.
Democracy isn't about you. Or me. It's about the majority.
Saying the quiet part out loud
But lets be honest, they've been doing that since 2016 and their cult is cheering for it
Yeah the only thing that surprised me here is that they moved the length of time they want to go back to back. It used to be to the 50s but now it seems they’re admitting they want the gilded age back
I had to read this comment 4 times to understand what it meant. Is it just me?
Yea, there's too many backs.
The fact that a party that has deified an adulterous, lecherous, lying, vulgar fraudster thinks it has any moral high ground on any subject is laughable
Cope and seethe, motherfucker
"Republican dislikes democracy" could be the title of almost any article about almost any Republican and it'd still be correct.
But only "When it goes against them"
Oh yay I’m going to be getting a lot of really gross and inaccurate billboards and YouTube ads.
Yeah I would not be surprised if they just re-ban marijuana. Abortion though, that’s not gonna succeed. It’s a constitutional amendment that won by over 10 points after a lot of underhanded attempts to kill it. If they succeed at this then they sever the final sliver of democracy in Ohio.
I watched the debate last night and half of those chucklefucks were like "I'M SO UPSET, WHY WOULD DEMOCRACY DO THIS, WE HAVE TO INTERVENE". Points to Christie (who, I believe, is trying to present himself as wide Biden) for actually sticking to his guns on the State's Rights rhetoric.
Of course, Christie is trying to be reasonable, so he has about a dollar's chance in a strip club of making it out of the primary.
So Widen?
Jokes on them, they already intervened. They just failed at it
Republicans are regressive on democracy and human rights.
What do they think will happen in 10 years?
"It would be an act of courage to ignore the results of the election and not allow for the murder of Ohio babies. We are probably 10 years away from this opinion being acceptable though."
would be an act of courage... not allow for the murder
Friends and neighbors, that's a call to violence.
Yeah and whos gonna stop him? It's not like he was doing something as horrible as condeming the Israelie slaughter of innocents, then maybe we could do something like hold a vote on how much we don't like him.
They don't want to govern, they want to rule.
"Responding to Tuesday's election outcomes, House Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, a GOP hardliner, urged anti-abortion campaigners to produce more graphic adverts to demonstrate that "abortion kills lives.""
I wonder how many she has had with her extra martial activities over the years? 🤔
So a republican in NORTH DAKOTA tweeted that OHIO should ignore the election? Correct me if I'm wrong, but that doesn't seem like the concerted push to overturn the election that I expected when reading that headline.
A democratically elected representative is saying that another group of elected representatives should ignore the results of an election and that doesn't strike you as concerning?
Fair point. But, I think the headline was a but sensationalized. Or, I'm just bad at reading, which is possible.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The poll was just one of a string of GOP reverses on Tuesday, which also saw Democrats take control of both chambers of the state legislature in Virginia and extend their majority on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Writing on X, formerly Twitter, North Dakota State Representative Brandon Prichard argued Tuesday's Issue 1 vote in Ohio should be ignored.
Ohio has a Republican governor in Mike DeWine, with the GOP also controlling both chambers of the state legislature, though none of these have suggested they will flat out ignore Tuesday's election result.
Prichard was challenged by Liam Siegler, a writer who has been published by the conservative National Review, who said: "I don't like today's results either but we have a constitution for a reason."
Reacting to the news in a statement on Tuesday night, President Joe Biden said: "Ohioans and voters across the country rejected attempts by MAGA Republican elected officials to impose extreme abortion bans."
Responding to Tuesday's election outcomes, House Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, a GOP hardliner, urged anti-abortion campaigners to produce more graphic adverts to demonstrate that "abortion kills lives."
The original article contains 597 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Starting to think that maybe these guys aren't too big on the whole "respecting elections" thing..
Maybe they're not on the up and up after all?