this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
217 points (98.7% liked)

politics

23874 readers
3338 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the federal hiring freeze lifting in mid-July, the Trump administration has rolled out a controversial federal hiring plan that critics warn will politicize and likely slow down the process rather than increase government efficiency.

De-emphasizing degree requirements and banning DEI initiatives—as well as any census tracking of gender, race, ethnicity, or religion to assess the composition of government—the plan requires every new hire to submit essays explaining which executive orders or policy initiatives they will help advance.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 80 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This will get struck down in court, and then Trump will do it anyway.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All the court cases are part of the strategy.

Force the Left to spend money to fight in court, while the taxpayers foot the bill for Donnie's lawyers.

It makes us weary, and drains out wallets.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, there's a name for it. But I forget what it is. The intention is to make the courts look illegitimate and biased when they rule against them. Only works on idiots, but, well, here we are.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Yeah, there's a name for it. But I forget what it is.

"Schlock and aaaauuuuughhhhhhh"?

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 62 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

at some point he will require that they have his portrait hanging in their homes

dictators always do

[–] Emergency3030@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Out of the North Korea play book

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Are you trying to say, you don't have the Führer's portrait on your wall? Sturmabteilung! Arrest this filthy traitor!

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sort of already a thing, at least in DoD workplaces, sadly.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had to pass through US customs on my way home (layover in JFK). Bastards have portraits of Trump and Noem on the fucking wall.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They always have photos of the current President up. That's every federal building. State buildings will have your governor.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's horrible! You guys need to cut the personality cults out.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yep... On the state level, it might actually depend on the governor as to whether or not they have to display them. Not sure.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

So the only qualification is enthusiastic, unquestioning loyalty to the stupidest man in the USA and his fascist program. Education and thinking will count against you. That checks out when you look at the people already working for him.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If I end up working for the federal government, I'll just have AI writing all my stupid shit for that. Don't have to compromise my values if I didn't write it, right?

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago

Ah, so cop qualifications

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always -- do not forget this, Winston -- always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- for ever.'

And remember that it is for ever. The face will always be there to be stamped upon. The heretic, the enemy of society, will always be there, so that he can be defeated and humiliated over again. Everything that you have undergone since you have been in our hands -- all that will continue, and worse. The espionage, the betrayals, the arrests, the tortures, the executions, the disappearances will never cease. It will be a world of terror as much as a world of triumph. The more the Party is powerful, the less it will be tolerant: the weaker the opposition, the tighter the despotism.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

we can write under ever post about trump: dumb narcissistic wannabe dictator

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I’m pretty sure we’ve passed the wannabe phase and entered full blown.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

fascism in progress

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Jesus fucking Christ.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 14 points 3 days ago

It also requires essays on applicants' commitment to upholding the Constitution, furthering government efficiency, and maintaining a strong work ethic.

As though it's remotely possible to support both Trump and the constitution.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So praising Trump's Executive Orders is supposed to show merit somehow?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Yes, unlike having a college degree in the field you are applying to

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

What a demented rapist clown. He's absolutely off his goddamned rocker.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I'd like to say I'm shocked, but I'm not. Latest thing in a long line of stupid shit

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago

If I was in a position where I could work for the government at all, I'd take the job, swear whatever they wanted me to, then make sure I hurt them as badly as possible. After all, they swore to uphold the constitution, didn't they?

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

He’s turning America into North Korea.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago
[–] bomberesque1@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Doubleplus good

[–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

That must be the hiring based on qualification initiative that the DEI haters were ranting about.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

When does the Pol Pot turn come and he starts executing people for wearing glasses?

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Totally normal presidential behavior.

[–] doug 2 points 3 days ago

Anytime I see him doing that fucking dance I just think of the end of Hereditary.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

It will make it more efficient because there is no need to consult decisions when all your minions will say yes.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Say the allegiance!

Do I have to?

Yes!

I pledge allegiance to Trump of the United Corporations of the world and to the corporations for which they stand one world nation under Trump with trickle down economics for all.