this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
271 points (94.1% liked)

Risa

6841 readers
42 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The only fake trekkies are the ones complaining that newer Trek is too political or "woke."

What show did they even watch?

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They're not "too political" or "woke," they're written by terrible committees and the executive producers / show runners are hacks.

Lower Decks (and Prodigy, I'm told) excluded.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Strange New Worlds is fantastic and takes plenty of risks other shows don't.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

It’s a little little hit or miss. I really liked some of it, but some of the early stuff wasn’t so great.

[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So it really is Star Trek, then. :P

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago (4 children)

People like to forget how many shit episodes of every series there are.

load more comments (4 replies)

You're not wrong...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The best Star Trek show is the one you like the most. If that's Discovery, that's fine. And if you don't like the show, that's also fine. But making an overall declaration that a show is terrible and tacitly expecting everyone to agree is not cool.

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm not expecting everyone agree whether or telling anyone whether or not they should or shouldn't like it, but there are many more demonstrable issues with writing and plotting, let alone canon, that exist in excess throughout Discovery, Picard, and SNW. These are objective issues that actual writers have taken issue with, and they're consistent issues with the executive producers involved.

Absolutely TNG or DS9 aren't some pantheon of perfection, but from an overall standpoint of consistency, narrative continuity, and proper handling of characters and their development? They're lightyears beyond the juvenile handling of characters and plots in the post 09 FMV shows. It's just fact.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Isn't this Han Solo and Chewbacca?

[–] orthen@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

No, this is Patrick (and perhaps Jonathan?)

No, I'm pretty sure it's Malcolm Reynolds and Wash.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

quacktv

For those who don't know, that is a picture of odo and quark from Deep Space nine. Quarks name has been deliberately misspelled as Quack.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

They deliberately misspelled Obi too.

[–] teft@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Uhhhh that is obviously Laas and Rom.

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's pronounced Netflix you dummy

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago (4 children)

~~Netflix~~Neelix and chill ;)

[–] Teal@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

Next trend? Sexy pictures of Neelix.

[–] blargerer@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'd sooner caution against gatekeeping.

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is an insane leap to call this gatekeeping when it's actively making fun of gatekeeping. If the line ended with Odo/Quark, sure, but it doesn't. The name is misspelled. Directly making fun of people who claim to be gatekeepers while knowing nothing about what they're talking about.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

Ensign, the joke still is about gatekeeping, so we are allowed to complain about anyone gatekeeping in this comment section.

Now go polish the phase inverters.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Agreed. I am very fond of star trek already and i am only 10 episodes into the original series. I believe it will take several months if not year before i get to know the characters in this picture.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm a real Trekkie. My favorite ships are the USS Prometheus and the MCRN Rocinante.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Good ships.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Wait, the Doctor had an alien companion at some point? I'm a trekky through and through but I didn't know that

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Dr quack

I want this character to appear in Star Trek

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

It's one of the lost serials.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm just cracking up picturing Odo changing into an obo to spy on the visiting Cardassian orchestra

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago
[–] Johanno@feddit.de 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I watched maybe 3-10 Startrek episodes, I didn't see those or most of the people in the memes here.

Still I love this community

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

quack

Quarks name is misspelled. They should've given him a duck head to make it more obvious

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago

That is because there are many series with each their own characters.

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I'm re-watching DS9 for the third time or something, but I've never seen anything released after Voyager except for the Abrams movie travesties. Am I still a Trekkie?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even those that only played Star Trek Online can consider themselves trekkies.

We don't gatekeep.

[–] teft@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago

I want to know these people who play STo but haven't watched Star Trek. Mainly to study them.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You should consider watching the Lower Decks episode "Hear All, Trust Nothing" if nothing else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago

Noooo, you need to watch every episode pay for extra subscription services just to watch every new episode the day it is release.

Honestly anyone can get into star trek if they want to

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Only like 1/4th of the new stuff even has half-decent writing. Only the last season of Picard and the Strange New Worlds or what ever are even good TV, let alone "Star Trek"

I ... guess what I'm saying is, you're not missing much. Stange New Worlds is probably the closest to old trek. The other crap is drama before even plot, let alone drama over intelligence.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

My favorite character was always Officer Woof

load more comments
view more: next ›