yea sure fuck it why not
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)
chapotraphouse
13965 readers
915 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Let me guess, this whole operation will be "managed" by AI.
America can, should, must, and will blow up the moon!
btw, isn't a large volume of water, like, extremely important for nuclear reactors?
Yeah I don't know how else to use nuclear radiation to make power except by heating water into steam. I know nasa has played with tiny reactors for spacecraft, but I don't know how they work. Perhaps they have something like a solar panel sitting next to a uranium rod and it generates electricity from that instead of photons?
They take advantage of the Seebeck effect which is where a voltage is generated between two points in a conducting material when there's a temperature difference between them. Basically the nuclear material heats one piece of metal in the circuit, while another remains cold, and this produces a potential difference between the two that drives current through the circuit. Because space is very cold and nuclear materials are very hot, this produces a useful quantity of current. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator
So they're going to have to scale this method way the fuck up to get to 100kw.
yeah it'd be very unfeasible
yes, while space is cold, the vacuum means that nearly all the heat has to be shed by radiation (meaning e.g. infrared radiation, not nookyular radiation) rather than conduction & convection. so the more you scale it up, the bigger the heat sinks needed. think giant metal fins to radiate away the heat. eventually it becomes prohibitive.
interestingly, the 40KW NASA pilot project this proposal appears to be derived from is a Stirling engine, not a radioisotope thermal generator like on New Horizons, Cassini, etc.
a Stirling design converts much more of the heat to electricity than an RTG, but it has moving parts.
You can actually do without it, but it will be much more complex and several times more expensive.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
To be fair, I think this is more than Mayo Pete ever did when he had this job
Idiot doesn't know these jobs are gifts and you're supposed to just sit and smile 
Interim NASA administrator 
the empire's reach continues to expand more and more fantastically, even as its grasp recedes faster and faster
Well while were just saying were gonna do things I'm planning on terraforming Venus sometime next year. Anyone who wants to help hmu. Shouldnt take too long.
Human-breathable air floats like helium on Venus’s surface. If you want to put people on Venus quickly, the most Earth-like environment in the Sol system floats like 55km above the surface so could get people in a sky city with less trouble than terraforming.
I dont wanna live in a blimp tho.
I don’t care who is doing it. Sending people to the moon again feels so unnecessary when you got robots.
They're gonna send a nuke to the moon and detonate it and say that's a nuclear reactor
This is just cover for putting nukes on the moon, right?
Watch this shit is to power ai
I'm announcing a nuclear reactor in my pants.
Good idea maybe the explosion won't send the moon out of orbit
What could possibly not happen?
Oil found on Moon
they're going to blow up the moon
TO POWER WHAT? WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKING MOONBASE
It's like you've never heard of extension cords
That would make the moon wrap around the earth and then we'd be stuck. Imagine it being March 12th or whatever for eternity
Source: I played tetherball in 4th grade so imagine this probably works the same
As long as we sync it up with christmas everyone will be happy, duh. You guys just keep trying to find problems with this obviously perfect plan.
How about we build a really build Tesla tower
No, no, we just put a giant slip ring around the entire earth, so it can rotate with the earth. Or more seriously, they can use microwave power transmission to send the power back to earth. Except, then it would be better to just use satellites because you can lock those in geosynchronous orbits so you’re not only getting power in a tiny window each night.
If we shoot microwaves at the earth from the moon does that mean I can hold up a hot pocket at the night sky when I want a hot pocket
Who said food doesn't rain down from the sky? Roasted bird does every day now!
TRUMP MOON-POWER CRYPTO - $100K MINIMUM BUY IN
Space elevator, but it's just a bunch of orange extension cords daisy-chained together up to the moon.
Burgerland is generously going to power the Sino-Russian moonbase
to be fair ideally you want the power source up there before the moonbase goes up
That information has yet to be declassified, along with the bear problem it has.
view more: next ›