this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
109 points (99.1% liked)

news

24256 readers
599 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image, and a considerable amount of the preamble's analysis, comes from this article in People's Dispatch.


A week ago, the Bolivian left-wing party, the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS), currently led by Luis Arce, decisively lost the round of elections against the right-wing. This comes after a prolonged period of "infighting" between Arce, and Morales, who previously led the MAS prior to the 2019 coup which briefly installed Jeanine Anez.

I put infighting in quotes because despite the nominal similarities between Arce and Morales, it is clear that this is not merely a counterproductive battle between two men - instead, the Bolivian left has arrived at a time of unavoidable conflict between two competing strategies. The electoral strategy is represented by Arce, who has aligned himself with a more middle-class-oriented campaign that is more economically liberal, whereas Morales represents a more working-class-oriented campaign that seeks to go further than tepid reform.

Such a conflict between electoralism and revolutionary action is inevitable in any and every developing country that 1) possesses a functioning left-wing party or organization, and 2) is under internal and/or external pressure by capitalists. This crisis must be resolved eventually - and this electoral failure is how such a crisis is manifesting right now. So while the Bolivian left has indeed lost the election, it is not yet defeated. The revolutionary campaign can, if it is willing, still ultimately stand triumphant. But what must be done is a real movement towards socialism, which goes beyond technocrats reforming from above, and instead transforms the state into a full political project of the working class, in which their movements, organizations, and protests are genuinely empowered. Such a project will involve repression by the forces of reaction, not least by the United States, but it is the only road left to take.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 18 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Vladimir Putin, more of this please:

EU head von der Leyen's plane landing on Sunday hit by suspected Russian GPS interference, FT says

However this happened in Bulgaria, are we certain the GPS didn't just ceased to work by itself?pikmin-chillin

[–] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 17 points 8 hours ago

Von Der Nazi was saying that Russia had to resort to using chips from washing machines for their weapons like 2 years ago, so this is not possible.

[–] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 8 points 7 hours ago

US airports seem to jam themselves these days, the 'it just happened to do that' hypothesis has legs

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 4 points 6 hours ago
[–] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 53 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Gen. Laura Richardson lists the Lithium Triangle in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile, Venezuela’s gold and oil, Guyana’s crude, and 31% of the planet’s fresh water as “national security” interests.

"We have 31% of the world's fresh water in this region"

https://x.com/iwasnevrhere_/status/1962186598453530906

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Real deployment or media propaganda? @latablablog digs into publicly available info once more to help split truth from fiction. Missile cruiser USS Lake Erie, reported to join the deployment on Venezuela's doorstep, is scheduled to be decommissioned next month

The missile cruiser USS Lake Erie (CG-70) crossed the Panama Canal last night en route to the Caribbean. But there is a contradiction: it is scheduled for DISMANTLING in September 2025. Real deployment or media narrative? The recorded events are inconsistent.

These are the facts:

  • The USS Lake Erie transited the Panama Canal on August 29 en route to the Caribbean.
  • The U.S. Navy plans to decommission it in Norfolk, Virginia, in September 2025.
  • It is an obsolete ship (32 years in service) with high maintenance costs.

Reuters reported that the ship would join an “anti-drug mission” near Venezuela, citing anonymous sources. But no official document supports this. Pattern of #FakeNews: Reuters has been wrong about Venezuela before.

Why is it inconsistent?

  • A ship undergoing decommissioning is not used in complex missions.
  • Norfolk is its logical destination (scrapyard).
  • The US already has modern destroyers in the area.

Conclusion: The narrative of “military deployment” appears to be a psychological tool to pressure Venezuela. Media outlets should verify sources, not amplify rumors.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 16 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

USS Lake Erie can still launch 32 Tomahawk Land Attack cruise Missiles. That's why it's being deployed, it adds considerable firepower. Total Tomahawk strike package is at around 140 cruise missiles right now, with all publicly known US assets in the area.

But we must also remember deception and alternative attack angles. Each P-8A Poseidon aircraft can carry 4 JASSM/LARSM type cruise missiles on external hardpoints on the wings, and 5 SLAM-ER or AARGM-ER missiles internally. P-8As have been spotted with LARSM under the wings recently. Each B-52 Stratofortress bomber forward deployed to Florida can carry 20 JASSM/LARSM total, with a combination of internal and external stores. This is not mentioning all the assets in the continental United States and unknown submarines.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 24 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

This is wishful thinking on the part of people that don't want to see this happen. They want to find reasons to disbelieve it

[–] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 31 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 21 points 19 hours ago

Remember the ~~Maine~~ Lake Eerie!

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 36 points 1 day ago

so maybe they sink it as a justification for invasion

[–] Lisitsyn@hexbear.net 38 points 1 day ago (4 children)

whats going on in indonesia?

[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 26 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Tldr, since the successful extermination of the Left in Indonesia, the country is unleashing the free market to do as it pleases. As climate crisis deepens, the ruling elites is liberalizing even more in the hope to eviscerate the Indonesian resources, exploit the workers and get out with the capital as the islands start to become inhabitable.

Recently, the government decided to give a monthly extra pension to the politicians as the people are dealing with price of food going higher and higher, leading to food riot. A gig worker got crash by a Riot police truck which was the straw that broke the camel's back.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 34 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Not directly answering the question but here’s some additional contexts:

Prabowo was Suharto’s son-in-law, and was heavily involved in the Indonesian race riots against ethnic Chinese in 1998 in the wake of the Asian Financial Crisis.

Some Indonesian Chinese wary of Prabowo Subianto amid painful memories of 1998 riots SCMP

The president-elect had previously admitted to being involved in the kidnapping of student democracy activists

While some older Chinese Indonesians oppose Prabowo, other younger voters are willing to look past the country’s dark history and support him

“Back then [in 2014 and 2019], we voted for Jokowi to prevent Prabowo from winning,” said Suwondo.

The 65-year-old retiree said many Chinese Indonesians suspected that the former general played a key role in the May 1998 riots, which occurred at the height of the Asian Financial Crisis and led to the resignation of the dictator Suharto, who was Prabowo’s father-in-law at the time.

Funny that China invited him to attend the Victory Day parade considering the anti-communist and anti-Chinese past.

Well, looks like he’s not going to make it now.

[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

There is a funny irony with the extermination of the left and the expulsion of the Chinese in Indonesia in the 60s.

As the country started to liberate and Suharto let private foreign investment in, the Chinese from the diapora just came back and started to establish itself in the country and inevitably becomes part of the bourgeoisie.

The Current president also partake in the genocide of East Timor

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

INB4 someone says color revolution ask yourself what you mean by that?

Do you mean that there's direct or semi-direct US involvement in fomenting and directing the protests, or suspect that there is? If so I haven't seen any hints of said involvement, maybe someone who knows a lot more about modern indonesian politics could explain how the US affects it.

Or do you mean that while the US is probably not at all directly involvement in the movement it nevertheless stands to benefit the most because it's the only world power with both the MEANS and the WILL to interfere in an event like this for its own benefit? If so then that's not a bad bet to make since things usually turn out good for the US but also it means there's a possibility for the movement to not end up serving american interests

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 10 points 18 hours ago

Don't forget the NGOs and socisl media saturation friendly to US interests. These are spread everywhere and become useful influences for increasing the chances the outcome of a "civil coups" is populated by a US-friendly crowd.

Remember how Bangladesh was having mass protest over jobs and working conditions, particularly wrt corruption and changes to quotas? That was resolved entirely in favor of the NGOs, with them populating the leadership of the interim government despite having basically nothing to do with the protests themselves. These kinds of groups can simply swoop in to be at the negotiating table when the larger movement is disorganized.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 24 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Or do you mean that while the US is probably not at all directly involvement in the movement it nevertheless stands to benefit the most because it's the only world power with both the MEANS and the WILL to interfere in an event like this for its own benefit?

ding ding ding

We need to evolve our understanding of color revolutions beyond "America made this happen!" to "America is constantly in position to intervene in genuine revolutionary movements and wield its resources to control the leadership of those revolutions, and has the capacity to withdraw the critical support of existing comprador regimes in order to facilitate a successful revolution when the pieces are in place".

Only a Leninist party or its organizational equivalent in discipline and analysis can counteract the power of the US state in a revolutionary circumstance. Without that ingredient, every revolution is a counterrevolution. This has been the case since the collapse of the socialist bloc, with only Yemen, Venezuela, and now the Alliance of Sahel States as counterexamples. During the cold war, revolutions almost always lead to the weakening of imperialism and colonialism because the counterpower of the USSR blocked hegemonic US influence over revolutions. With the USSR gone, that hegemonic control is able to sway the vast majority of revolutions in its favor.

That period of counterrevolution is, I think, coming to an end specifically because China has undermined the US's economic hegemony, which is necessary for the conditions before and after the revolution to play in the US's favor. The USSR blocked military and political hegemony, but economics is the base, and so China's strategy may be the more successful one in the long run.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 20 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

but economics is the base, and so China's strategy may be the more successful one in the long run.

You are correct that economic power is a very potent force to be wielded, but that is also precisely why China is constrained, because of its neoliberal ideology.

We just discussed this the other day on another thread. The prime example is that even China - what many here will gladly call a socialist superpower - simply failed to stop the genocide from happening.

People on this site like to pretend that this socialist superpower is simply not interested in intervening in international affairs (accusation of national socialism), that this great socialist power on the verge of overtaking the US empire is simply too weak to do anything about a genocide (too strong and too weak at the same time), or the worse I’ve seen, that China cannot intervene to stop a genocide because it is “playing the long game” based on some ancient wisdom so it’s actually fine and in fact, good that a great economic power should just let the genocide happen (Oriental mysticism).

The simple answer here is that China’s socialism is not the traditionally defined socialism. Its model is market socialism aka Socialism with Chinese characteristics. It is a project to achieve socialism through adhering to the market principles of neoliberal ideology. This is why it cannot do what the USSR once did, because it is economically constrained by its ideology.

China already has the economic, financial, political and even military power to bring to heel the world’s economy to stop a genocide - if it wants to, but it cannot because of this belief system. If you look at China’s foreign policy before the 1970s reform and opening up era and compare to those afterwards, it’s night and day. China was far far far weaker and yet fought the Americans in Korea and then in Vietnam. What happened in the 1970s then? Because of the adoption of the neoliberal ideology, and you even have China invading communist Vietnam to appease the Americans (Deng’s own words, not mine).

Since the Ukraine war started in 2022, I had hoped that Russia could lead the Global South in demonstrating that it is in fact, possible to transform its economy by abandoning neoliberalism due to the war economy. Unfortunately this has not transpired, and unlikely to happen any time soon. And this is also why we call BRICS a “multipolar neoliberalism” at best, because all of the BRICS countries still adhere to the neoliberal market principles.

And the worst of all? It is America that has realized that neoliberalism is at the end of its shelf life and already taking all the initiatives to transform itself into a new form of fascist state, while the rest of the world still wishes that this is a mere aberration and that the status quo will somehow be restored after Trump. Failure to adapt to a new historical circumstance will prove fatal.

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 5 points 10 hours ago

This is just a gut feeling but I'd guess that modern china's stance on non-intervention is based more on its interpretation of anti-colonialism than is is on its interpretation of chinese socialism, insofar as those things can be separated even.

Because of the adoption of the neoliberal ideology, and you even have China invading communist Vietnam to appease the Americans (Deng’s own words, not mine).

That doesn't sound right because Deng sent Carter a letter telling him china was gonna invade and Carter straight up told him he shouldn't do it but america wouldn't make a fuss. Probably just happened completely as a function of the sino-soviet split and wanting to give a soviet ally a bloody nose to prevent it from expanding soviet influence in southeast asia.

[–] thoughtful_poster@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

People on this site like to pretend that this socialist superpower is simply not interested in intervening in international affairs (accusation of national socialism), that this great socialist power on the verge of overtaking the US empire is simply too weak to do anything about a genocide (too strong and too weak at the same time), or the worse I’ve seen, that China cannot intervene to stop a genocide because it is “playing the long game” based on some ancient wisdom so it’s actually fine and in fact, good that a great economic power should just let the genocide happen (Oriental mysticism).

china intervening against Israel would directly lead to world war 3 and nukes being fired. im really not sure what's so difficult to understand

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

China literally just withheld rare earth exports and the US folded. No nukes were launched.

There are many ways that China can play this game, to stop a genocide from happening on the international stage, as a global superpower. You are underestimating the economic and military prowess of China and its hold on the global economies.

Besides, if “starting world war 3” is the excuse for non-intervention here, then you are conceding literally NOTHING can possibly be done. Funny that some people accuse me of being a doomer lol.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago

I don't think China intervening economically against Israel would be treated the same as doing it against the US.

[–] Boise_Idaho@hexbear.net 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

There are many ways that China can play this game, to stop a genocide from happening on the international stage, as a global superpower. You are underestimating the economic and military prowess of China and its hold on the global economies.

The SU did not stop the Holocaust until the Nazis invaded the SU. Or for that matter, the SU was neutral towards Japan while the IJA was ethnically cleansing Chinese people. Why are you holding the current PRC under Xi at a higher standard than the SU under Stalin?

[–] bubbalu@hexbear.net 14 points 16 hours ago

Not a remotely accurate comparison. Nazi Germany had 1/3 the population of the SU, a significantly larger military-industrial base, a shared border, and a stated intention of eradicating communism/Bolshevism. Also the SU provided material and technical support to the KMT and CP to resist Japanese aggression since the early 30s.

Meanwhile, the PRC is 2 orders of magnitude larger than the zionist entity and is the penultimate world power. It should be held to a higher standard because it is in an infinitely stronger position to act.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

My friend, the USSR did not become a global superpower until the Cold War.

Also, China is in an extremely powerful position for being integrated into the global economy - an advantage that the USSR did not have. It can literally stop world trade and force countries to come to the negotiating table if it really wants to assert its role as a world leader.

Again, you are underestimating how much dependent the Western powers are to China’s industrial capacity.

EDIT: In case I’m not being clear, China restricting its exports would force Western economies to fold or at least be willing to negotiate. This is why the rare earth export restriction was so effective. However, China cannot do that on a greater scale because its economy is heavily dependent on exports… a key feature of its neoliberalized economy. It believes that giving up the export revenues would mean the balance sheet cannot be balanced, and the workers will lose their jobs unless the government pumps the deficit up. Higher deficit would violate the IMF rules though… so it’s not an option.

[–] Boise_Idaho@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

My friend, the USSR did not become a global superpower until the Cold War.

There's plenty of genocides that the Soviet Union didn't intervene in during the Cold War. Case in point was the genocide against Chinese Indonesians after Suharto seized power. Suharto liquidated the third largest communist party at that time, and the SU didn't even suspend diplomatic relations with Indonesia.

People need to stop having this alt-history of the SU in their head. The SU didn't go around invading random anti-communist countries. The SU arguably didn't even invade Nazi Germany, but merely finished a fight that the fascists started. At best, the SU funded various communist parties and supplied various Soviet-sympathetic militants with weapons with occasional deployment of Soviet military personnel like Soviet pilots during the Korean War. There's nothing wrong with what the SU did. The CPSU was more than willing to provide military material support and ideological training to orgs who were receptive to their aid, but the ultimate responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of the anti-imperialist orgs and militants.

Also, China is in an extremely powerful position for being integrated into the global economy - an advantage that the USSR did not have. It can literally stop world trade and force countries to come to the negotiating table if it really wants to assert its role as a world leader.

Fundamentally, I don't think the Chinese political class cares enough about Palestine to make any serious geopolitical moves. And I don't think their geopolitical calculus would seriously change even if every single neoliberal economist gets Hudson-pilled. They probably care about Palestine as much as the DRC or Sudan, which are also suffering from US proxies (Rwanda and the UAE). Why do you think the PRC was far more willing to sell Pakistan weapons than Iran? It has nothing to do with the CPC embracing neoliberalism and everything to do with geopolitics. Iran is an unreliable partner due to reformists fuckery while Pakistan has a much longer working relationship with China on top of being a very reliable check against China's geopolitical rival India. Is it China's fault for not giving Iran preferential treatment for the sake of counter-hegemony or is it Iran's fault for having factions within their political class that are borderline traitorous sellouts to the West? Whatever the answer may be, at the end of the day, Pakistan brought more to the table than Iran and was treated accordingly.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

Why do you think the PRC was far more willing to sell Pakistan weapons than Iran?

Ideological constraints, as I said. Economics determined by neoliberal ideology, which then dictates (or constrains) their geopolitical stances.

Again, you only have to look at the difference in foreign policy before and after the reform and opening up. Two very different forms of economic systems that yielded diverging foreign policies.

Finally, you are still underestimating how deeply the Chinese economy has integrated itself into the world. The USSR was nowhere near that. To put it another way, the USSR had a robust self-contained economy that, for the most parts but not always, shielded itself from the fluctuations in the Western capitalist economies, and its means of channeling its geopolitical dominance is through its military force that rivaled those of the US.

But China is a completely different beast. It has 31% of the global manufacturing capacity. I repeat - one-third of the world’s productive forces that are fully integrated into the globalized economy. The leverage that China has on the world today simply did not exist in the USSR.

[–] thoughtful_poster@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

i love being drawn in to a discussion of baseless assertions

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I mean, you’re the one that says that China intervening would cause nukes to fly, as though China doesn’t have the diplomatic expertise to deal with the West and possess a series of tools (backed by its strong economic base) that can be weaponized and leveraged to ramp up the pressure to force an outcome.

The implicit assumption here is that the Chinese leadership is too stupid to deal with the Israelis / collective West and that their intervention will be so tactless that it immediately triggers world war 3. Once again, you’re underestimating China’s capability.

[–] bubbalu@hexbear.net 5 points 17 hours ago

The only baseless assertion is that "china intervening against Israel would directly lead to world war 3 and nukes being fired."

[–] heartheartbreak@hexbear.net 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The potential of a color revolution is less that the revolutionary conditions are because of the us instead of internal contradictions, and more so that all the islamist and socialist parties are for the most part incoherent petty bourgeois parties w "left" parties in coalition w "right" parties, including those "socialist" parties that are in coalition w prabowo.

Just 7 months ago indonesia finally was announced as a brics partner by brazil and prabowo has made a significant shift towards multipolarity, so im sure the us appreciates the revolutionary situation and i have no doubt that just like ukraine they are doing whatever they can to make the situation fall out in their favor.

[–] smokeppb@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/indonesias-prabowo-scraps-china-trip-tiktok-halts-live-feed-amid-protests

Seems that the people of Indonesia are tired of capitalist rot symptoms like low employment for the youth and rising cost of living and taxes. Also an incident where a taxi driver was killed. More recently there has been a scandal where, after parliament raised their own wages, people called for parliament to be dissolved.

Sahroni has faced accusations of responding insensitively to people calling for parliament to be dissolved amid anger over lawmakers’ allowances. Sahroni has labelled such critics “the stupidest people in the world”.

That guy's house got burned down lol.

Very "everybody remain calm" style responses from the police and military. So the Indonesian government is turning back to their Jakarta method roots it seems. Solidarity to the Indonesian people.

[–] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago

I got a giiiirl in kalamazooooo

[–] carl_marks_1312@hexbear.net 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/indonesias-president-cancels-china-trip-protests-continue-2025-08-30/

Indonesia's president cancels China trip as protests continue

Sahroni has faced accusations of responding insensitively to people calling for parliament to be dissolved amid anger over lawmakers' allowances. Sahroni has labelled such critics "the stupidest people in the world".

[–] miz@hexbear.net 7 points 22 hours ago

Wry Sahroni kelly

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The state of the UK right now

[–] dougfir@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

would be funny if the uk went down like the ussr, with england being the first to leave

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago
[–] whatdoiputhere12@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kinda out of the loop regarding British politics. What started this whole hanging the flags on lamp posts and painting roundabouts?

[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

They use the flag to show that they're racist with plausible deniability, it got picked up by the news and since then racists have been vice signaling like this in increasingly dumb ways. Since grafitti and flags are being taken down they're arguing they are being persecuted merely for being proud of being English. They've also expanded this to the flag of the UK, which makes even less sense since Labour has been trying to shag that flag ever since Starmer came into power.

Using the English flag outside of a sporting context has been a way to signal which pubs that non-white people might not be welcome in for a while (as an example), but it exploded in use due to the exposure they got in the news.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago

they're arguing they are being persecuted merely for being proud of being English

Good, they should be.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago

They've also expanded this to the flag of the UK, which makes even less sense since Labour has been trying to shag that flag ever since Starmer came into power.

So exactly like here in amerikkka but it'sukkk

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 3 points 18 hours ago

It's a bit too on the nose that it's already half of a swastika.

[–] built_on_hope@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

It’s been that way for years. Remember the Ed Miliband / white van debacle?

RT has some good background information on Andrey Parubiy, the Ukrainian Neo-Nazi that someone shot dead today in the western Ukrainian city of Lvov:

https://www.rt.com/russia/623713-parubiy-neo-nazi-maidan-kingpin-assassinated/

load more comments
view more: next ›