304
Rudy is strapped for cash (edition.cnn.com)
submitted 10 months ago by wolfpack86@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

If only he knew a competent lawyer.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 129 points 10 months ago

Did he try pulling himself up by the bootstraps? What about not having an iPhone? Starbucks coffee? Avocado toasts?

[-] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

One of the greatest money saving tips we got up here in Canada is that cancelling Disney plus ($12/month plus taxes) would help struggling families deal with inflation and make ends meet.

Thanks chrystia freeland, you out of touch ghoul. That $12 a month will surely overcome the several hundred dollars a month increase in costs to food, shelter, and gasoline/heat since 2019.

To be non partisan, the federal leader of the opposition also suggested Canada could opt out of inflation by embracing bitcoin, right before it Collapsed 60%

As you can see, the people in charge up here have nothing but the best, most well thought out advice for the average Canadian and those bootstraps will be pulled up any day now.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I feel your pain. Canadian conservatives are doing exactly the same BS as the ones in the US. Conservatism is the problem, no matter what is the name of party/country/society.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Conservatism is the problem, no matter what is the name of party/country/society.

I wish more people understood this. Conservatism is the problem in Iran and China too.

[-] Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net 2 points 10 months ago

And they're being weird about it too, from what I've heard.

It's like they forgot that the US and Canada are different countries

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I bet he's even got a fridge!

[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

This reference will never not make my blood boil. Fuck Fox ”news”.

[-] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[-] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

For a while, mainstream/right wing news especially told voters that many people under the poverty line couldn't be that badly off since such and such a percent of them had basic conveniences in their living places, like fridges, dishwasher, etc. It was one of those 90s strategies to create resentment against public programs.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Maybe his public defender will suggest to take the plea since their caseload is too large

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Come on, give the guy a break. He's trying! Everyone knows he's only buying economy hair dye.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Dressedlikeapenguin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

He did save a bundle by not getting his lower set of teeth fixed, he's trying, lol

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He destroyed his legal career to defend Trump. He went on news channels and pointedly said that it’s normal for a lawyer to pay off hush money and never tell a client. His own law firm fired him because nobody wants a lawyer that spends such massive amounts of your money without telling you. Then he told so many lies that his law license was suspended by the bar for unprofessional behavior and disgracing the legal profession. And after all that, Trump refused to pay him because he didn’t like the outcome of the case.

NOW Giuliani is being sued by the poll workers he slandered and had their lives threatened, and Giuliani admitted to the court that he doesn’t have enough money to fight the case and won’t put up a defense. That’s in addition to the lawsuits against him by Dominion and Smartmatic which are still in progress.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

I'm imagining Rudy going bankrupt and ending up in prison for the rest of his life, with his entire legacy reduced to his failure to defend an orange-skinned pig.

And now I can't wipe this smile off my face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He's also being sued by his former employee whom he sexually assaulted/harassed (I'm not saying allegedly because he was recorded doing it). I believe she's looking for a couple million dollars. And then of course there's the criminal indictment, with probably more to come. I'd imagine his only source of income, apart from any investments he might have, is speaker fees from shitty Trump aligned group events, maybe he can write a book to raise cash. America's mayor is fucked.

[-] milkjug@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

There's likely a bottomless pit of gullible neckbeard R's that will contribute if he starts a gofundme.

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It's like he watched too much Boston Legal and thought he was Denny.

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

I guess he shouldn't have been a traitor to our country then.

[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Alright this is just too juicy to ignore.

In civil litigation, the plaintiff will often seek discovery of the defendant's finances, insurance policies, etc to find out if the defendant will ultimately be able to pay a judgement. Looks like Guliani is trying to avoid that because he's embarrassed he's broke:

While the former mayor has declined in court to provide details of his financial state, his lawyers wrote this week that “producing a detailed financial report is only meant to embarrass Mr. Giuliani and draw attention to his misfortunes.”

The article also cited campaign disclosures showing Trump's PAC was paying Guliani's bills related to record storage and production, at a cost of $300k. But it sounds like Trump cut him off:

On Wednesday, Katz argued Giuliani did not have the funds to pay for producing records in a lawsuit brought by voting technology company Smartmatic, adding that the “third-party source” that paid for his earlier bill was “not willing to give any additional money.”

By May, Giuliani was more than $320,000 behind in payments to the document hosting company, according to a sworn statement he made in court. “I do not have the funds to pay this amount at this time,” he wrote. 

He negotiated for a year with what his lawyers say were “third-party funding sources” for help in paying his legal bills, and awaited funding for six months for help with the Trustpoint bill, according to Giuliani’s filing this week in the Smartmatic case. But the $340,000 payment [previous one time payment from Trump's PAC to catch Guliani up on data hosting bills] isn’t enough to cover more searches, Trustpoint “will not extend any further credit” to him, and his bill to keep his data held by the company will keep growing by the month, his court filings say. On Wednesday, the New York state judge in that case gave Giuliani two weeks to find the money needed to produce the records to Smartmatic. If he fails to do so, the judge said Giuliani would be forced to pay some of Smartmatic’s legal costs.

What is fun is if he doesn't produce documents he may ultimately get sanctioned with negative inferences (instruction to the jury that they should assume anything Guliani didn't turn over was basically a smoking gun against him) or a default judgement as to liability (see Alex Jones). He's fucked lol. Damn I am never not fascinated by the epic fall of Guliani.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Your last comment might be the most salient

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

“This is not merely an excuse that Giuliani trudges out when required to produce documents,” his latest filing said.

I believe I recall that he ran away to avoid being served his court docs.

Def not a pattern of behavior. You can trust him. /s

[-] gamer@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

he may ultimately get sanctioned with negative inferences (instruction to the jury that they should assume anything Guliani didn’t turn over was basically a smoking gun against him)

Is there precedent for this? It's not like he's refusing to turn over records, he's just unable to due to financial hardships (allegedly, he could be lying I guess). If it were anybody else, that would be an incredibly fucked up thing for the courts to do to somebody.

[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Your right, it's usually when the defendant is engaging in bad faith, like purposely hiding documents. The case I remember, defendant intentionally refused to turn over a bad document and might even have destroyed it, but one of the law clerks at defendant's firm decided to be a whistleblower. I don't know if there's specific precedent for this if the grounds are just I'm to broke to conduct a search, but it's possible. It's usually a last resort, the judge will just keep issueing fines and attorneys fees for a few months. But at some point the case needs to move forward in the interst of justice, and the judge is going to have to figure out a way to do that if Guliani won't turn over the documents needed for the case. I doubt the "I'm too broke" excuse is going to hold up forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] athos77@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago

A) This is entirely self-inflicted.

B) Guiliani is worth somewhere around $40-45 million, he's not going to be eating ramen or selling blood.

C) Anyway ...

[-] Skyler@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago

Just imagine if he hadn't hitched his wagon to the S.S. Trumptanic. He could be working a comfy legal/political analyst position at Fox News or CNN and not have to worry about losing his license, his credibility, his money, and his freedom. Oh well.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

He could have remained, "America's Mayor," that 9/11 hero guy. Now he's America's Traitor.

[-] Overzeetop@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Seriously, how can you possibly look at his history of dealings and not know, going in, he's going to screw you over / toss you under the bus the moment things get dicey.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

If only he could get a plea deal and make it all go away.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

That's OK. An attorney can be appointed to him.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Hmmm. Was he ever paid by his last client? How unusual.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

His most recent job was unpaid intern for Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago
[-] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Good thing Trump is a loyal friend who always pays his lawyers fully.

[-] gamer@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

a $20,000 monthly fee to a company to host his electronic records, $15,000 or more for a search of his records

Props to the tech company ripping this guy off

[-] MrPloppy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Let's all dig deep for the little guy....

[-] Xendarq@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Maybe Four Seasons Landscaping can hire him.

[-] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago

Hope he can scrape together enough doing Cameo clips. Couldn't be happening to a better person.

[-] finthechat@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
304 points (95.8% liked)

politics

18073 readers
4502 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS