For me, I'm much more into feminine people than anyone else, but genitals oddly do matter to an extent. A feminine person, either genitals work, but a masculine person, gotta be male genitals. However, it's significantly rarer for me to be attracted to masculine people than feminine people, even if it does happen and the intensity isn't any different. Androgynous people my brain just gets confused and goes with whichever it assumed first when it comes to attraction.
Because of how complex that is to say, I don't think those labels really work for me. Just saying I'm bi is much simpler and I can just elaborate if needed. Even if there was a label for "attracted to all 3 presentations" it doesn't really fit for me because even though I am technically attracted to androgynous people, it's only because my brain shoved them into a masculine or feminine box.
That's why I'm a fan of keeping the old labels too. There's people like me they just work better for.

I think that was the intention, but it had unintended consequences. When people described themselves as straight for a long time, their intention certainly was to say "I am a man who prefers people with female genitalia" or "I am a woman who prefers people with male genitalia," but regardless of the intent, it didn't stop many people describing themselves as straight from being attracted to people of their preferred gender without their preferred genitals, or not being attracted to people who were not of their preferred gender but did have their preferred genitals. It just made people who did end up feeling this way less comfortable admitting to themselves that they felt that way. That's why the distinction between gender preference and genital preference is important IMO.