this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
375 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2640 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 104 points 8 months ago

Trump tweeting 300 times between 3 and 6 AM wasn't evidence enough?

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 72 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We’re deep in the ‘Fat Elvis’ stage

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

Everyone's joking about "big surprise" but it's helpful to have documentation of any kind rather than suspicion. There are also probably plenty of people who are less extremely online who didn't make the connection, and now here's an established journalistic outlet doing so.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When you can’t do your normal morning line off a hooker’s ass cause you’re being political and shit.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

When you can’t do your normal morning line off a hooker’s ass cause ~~you’re being political and shit.~~ the hookers lawyered up.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 34 points 8 months ago

What?!! I never would have guessed.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

Ronnie Jackson was also the main White house physician for the last few years of the Obama administration. It would be interesting to compare the receipts from that time vs. the Trump administration.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hey, remember the last right-wing fascists that was really into amphetamines? Europe sure does remember.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I didn't know The Queen was a crank fiend.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

She was definitely on "E"[arl Grey tea]...

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Good thing they had all that Xanax to help with the anxiety caused by the treason and shitty decision-making, otherwise they'd have to deal with it like the rest of us.

[–] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 8 months ago

As one former senior administration official puts it: “You try working for him and not chasing pills with alcohol.”

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago
[–] ma11en@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I saw it in this documentary, I wouldn't want to watch any more series though.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He’s like Hitler in more ways than one.

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

At least Hitler liked dogs.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why can't every house be like Trump's white house?

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The fed say so

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

So? God CLEARLY created Speed and Xanax to be used! But also we need to ARREST anybody smoking WEED!

[–] Fish@midwest.social 6 points 8 months ago
[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I just want to note that they're referring to modafinil/Provigil as a controlled substance and a stimulant. It's technically a controlled substance, but it's Schedule IV (low priority, low chance of abuse) whereas Adderall is Schedule II. It's also not a stimulant, but some people would say it's better because it doesn't have the teeth-grindy, methy feeling that many stimulants do. Modafinil "promotes wakefulness" but doesn't prevent sleep. So you can imagine people taking it to stay awake for long hours working, but they won't be pacing around or talking rapidly like with some stimulants.

The medical unit was still irresponsible in prescribing meds without proper record-keeping and evaluation, but I wanted to clarify about modafinil specifically.

[–] mako 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Marijuana is a schedule 1 drug and therefore "more dangerous and prone to abuse" than fucking prescreption meth. I'm not going to put much weight into drug classifications written largely by companies that stand to profit from their own and their competition's standing.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I'm not arguing that the drug schedules are legitimate. Clearly having weed and heroin in the same category is ludicrous. I'm arguing that the authors use of "controlled substances" is technically true but a little dramatic as modafinil is schedule IV. I've been prescribed both modafinil and Adderall, and I can say that modafinil does not act or feel like a stimulant, and it's not habit-forming.

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

Hey lookit! Just like the nazi's! Yall know the Nazi's were tweakin 24/7 dontcha?

[–] astrsk@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago