The good thing about this is that I will never attract these guys.
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
280 points (100.0% liked)
196
17131 readers
32 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Tell me about your philtrum.
It... exists
Wrong answer! You're a -10/10, now you will never know my girth
That's fine, I know my own
Party on, girth.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Oh no your lack of belief in my actractiveness to you has made me attracted to you.
What do you do?
-
Roll a d20 this is a DnD scenario now.
-
Ew, well I am not attracted to you, internet stranger.
-
Wait, what if you were a woman? That would be less icky.
-
Ugh comments like this prove humanity has gone backward.
I am bored all of these are acceptable answers...
This is satire, right?
right?
It's not. That subreddit is garbage. The mods legit ban people if the user rates people higher than the mod wants.
load more comments
(7 replies)
No
load more comments
(2 replies)
You could present those guys with a supermodel or the fucking platonic ideal of a woman and they would go "that's 7.1 at most, stop overrating"
You get these guys in a room with any objectively good-looking woman in real life, and they would freeze up.
They don't freeze in fear. They freeze because they are analyzing that philtrum.
they have a point
clearly cute nerdy girls with glasses or tomboys are superior smh 😤😤.
I don't care if it's knitting or being a tank mechanic, a girl nerding out over her interests is hella cute.
Or anyone else, for that matter.
100%, nerding is hot. That look of excitement and focus does a whole lot.
Right? A person telling you all about that thing they're passionate about is straight up beaming when they do it, I love it.
MFers out here rating women like they're dogs at fucking crufts
Didn't she post the picture and asked people to rate her?
I agree that it's ridiculous and insane but if she asked for being superficially rated and she gets that.... You really can't blame the guys rating her.
Almost everyone is uglier than this girl anyway. If she is a 7, we are 3. :)
most posts on there are incels taking pics from girls social media and pretending to post as the girl
Didn’t she post the picture and asked people to rate her?
more like a bot posted that picture.
why did you have to expose me to this nonsense
No way, please tell me that subreddit is satire 😱
nah unfortunately it's a safe space for incels
Is that why the text they wrote was so disturbing to read? Have they lived in an echo chamber for so long that they think it’s okay to talk about a person like they’re a cadaver. F’ing creepy
On one hand, rating peoples' appearance is the whole point of that subreddit, but on the other hand... My God, do these guys have a talent for making it disgustingly creepy.
I wouldn't even expect actual cosmetic surgeons to talk like that.
They rate according to extremely rigid rules which, aside from being racist, are ridiculously unfair.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
What do you have to look like to achieve more than a 7? A biblically accurate angel?
Totally would hit that.
Yes. Specifically 
Too many eyes but not fat or disfigured. 4/10.
The whole thing is designed to allow them to call people (especially women) "mid". They arbitrarily chose to use a gaussian distribution pattern so they had an excuse not to give anyone a score beyond 6s.
But real answer is be a hugely successful fashion model who the sub creator found attractive. Then their "objective rating standards" would include arbitrary criteria to bundle your face in. The whole sub could be replaced with a trivial ML model if it were actually about just giving their "objective" ratings. The internal weights used by the ML model would make about as much sense as the crap spouted in the screenshot.
If you really want to confront the madness:
I'd note that almost all of the headshots there have a lot of makeup, and the named ones are almost certainly professional makeup.
You don't even see light makeup until the 7s and 6.5 range. Damn neckbeard(s?) don't even know what a woman actually looks like, and apparently expect women to pay for a professional cosmetologist to do them up before they leave the house.
Edit: it might be an amusing experiment to post those given a "9.5", but from a shot where they have their normal day to day "face" on and see what rank they get. Or at least how long until its deleted.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I wonder how many people would actually sort them similar to how they're sorted in the first picture.
Because to me the distribution of attractive people between 5.0 and 10 seems to be completely random.
load more comments
(15 replies)
shes pretty im envious
Actually she's quite a 8 or 9 rather for my score. You should checkout my ratemywomen page as well /s
I’m tentatively giving her an 8 but I need to see the MRI and CT scan to be certain.
load more comments
(1 replies)
oh yeah this is why im sapphic
Idk she’d be prettier if she talked to a therapist about her insecurity in her appearance
this is actually insanity...
I know most Lemmy user's have a hate boner for Reddit for many other reasons than this, but IMO all of the /r/AmIUgly, /r/AmISexy, /r/rateme, and other rating subreddits are an absolute cancer on the site.
90% of posts are from new accounts with questionable verification methods, with the others being people trying to shill their OF profiles. I can accept that, but what really boils my piss is that almost all of the comments follow this pattern:
- Slating anyone remotely attractive for being attention seeking, or posting incorrectly on a sub "intended for ugly people", all while that person only comments on the attractive people.
- Obvious negging, as if giving some super attractive girl a 6/10 is going to make them jump into their DM's and ask "what can I do to be better for you sempai?"
- The inevitable stalking of their account, attempt to give into their DM's, or reverse image search that ends up with a post on these subs gaining you 100 new IG followers and some thirsty cunts liking and commenting on your pics.
- Toxic behaviour when someone tries to actually be nice, or to offer some friendly advice. If I had a penny for every time a woman commented on a post on those subs with some advice, only for some guy to shit on them and say "lol no they need to go to the gym"
Obviously, these subs are going to exist, but they just make me end up hating people, because it's always the same pattern.
Dudes out here comparing phrenology notes like that shit still valid.
view more: next ›