132
submitted 2 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago

Meanwhile the Steam Deck is selling like gangbusters.

[-] Ashtear@lemm.ee 37 points 2 months ago

I didn't see that coming, and it's a welcome development. If it warps the general PC hardware market enough that devs start optimizing for a standard platform, it'll result in less buggy products at launch. And maybe orienting development towards a relatively underpowered platform will make it easier for those of us ~~dumb enough to~~ that like to spend more on a desktop to hit those 60 FPS targets.

[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

I think it's more important that it gives Valve a method of avoiding being shoehorned into a "Windows only world". The Steam Deck is largely why Linux has pushed past 2% market share on the Steam Hardware Survey consistently now. Holo, which is the codename for SteamOS on the Deck, makes up over half of Steam on Linux.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not dillusional. Windows is still far and away the majority platform and will be for some time. However, there is a real, functional choice now that didn't exist a few years ago.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Too bad Valve is not incentivizing native Linux ports.

[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Chicken and Egg. Linux is barely above 2%. When it breaks 10-20% market share, I expect companies will start making native ports more common.

The fact that proton/dxvk/vulkan/wine let's things just work with little to no changes is already pretty incredible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

The benefit of Steam is backwards compatibility. The moment you force native porting you lose your greatest benefit. Since you anyway have to build backwards compatibility with Windows you gain nothing by incentivizing native Linux and the developers gain nothing from being incentivized to build native because their games will work through Proton.

There's no reason for Valve to incentivize native builds. It's the devs that need to have an incentive to develop natively for Linux. And with the market share being what it is there's no incentive for the devs either.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

how i personally see it is that it welcomes devs to set a new minimum pc requirement to target. due to valve not doing contstent iterations (which imo is actually a good thing), it gives people a point of performance comparison reference to when wanting to play a new title.

[-] finthechat@kbin.social 54 points 2 months ago

They're just tanking so they can get a high draft pick next year.

[-] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 15 points 2 months ago

They should be careful, tank too much and they’ll be relegated to the championship

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aksdb@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

I am not a marketing expert, but when headlines pile up implicating that Microsoft doesn't fully stand behind XBox anymore, no wonder the number for new customers tank. I wouldn't "invest" in something that seems to be on the way out either.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

Judging by how Sony is doing even though they clearly "won" with the PS5, it looks like consoles as we know them are not long for this world, and that seems to be the idea Microsoft is pivoting around.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 months ago

Xbox should just go straight pc game setup for the living room. A mass produced windows (I know, blegh) pc with a pretty solid gpu and Xbox controllers. Basically the steam deck treatment for the living room.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 months ago

That's pretty much what the Xbox has been since the beginning. The original runs fucking directX and runs so similarly to PCs of the era under the hood that porting shit to it is famously easy. It's why the homebrew scene for it was so mind bogglingly huge.

Numerous times at E3 when they had demo units of new consoles people saw that the debug menus meant for staff were some mangled form of the current (at the time) Windows OS.


Most modern game consoles don't use much specialty hardware anymore. The OG Switch uses the nvidea shield CPU just downclocked, and can run android easily. Some emulators literally run better on the Switch through Android than as homebrew "native" apps.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 months ago

Yes, but games were always "xbox" games. I straight up mean open for pretty much all PC games to run on. If a game dev makes their game work with an x box control scheme, you can play it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I think signs are pointing toward that being their plan.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

And it is very bad for the consumers, as the console market highly needs the competition. It’s a shame how MS is dropping the ball with Xbox

[-] hightrix@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

I still believe their naming conventions has destroyed the brand.

Grandma that wants to buy a toy for their kids can go to the store and buy the next PlayStation. Xbox… which one do they buy? They don’t, they buy the easy option.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

This happened to me! I thought I was buying the newest gen. But then…games I was trying to buy were “not optimized for your console.”

I’m still not sure which one I have. I think I have the ONE S. But the games I’m looking to buy are “optimized for X|S series,” but…don’t work on my console. I’m moving to PlayStation soon.

Also, I have a feeling all that news a few months ago about how they’re gonna stop support for Xbox and may not continue to make games for it or will shut down the console division or whatever cannot have helped sales. I don’t remember the articles exactly. But the impression I was left with was Xbox was on its way out. Why would I buy another if they’re unsure of its future?

[-] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

This is exactly what happened with my mom trying to buy a Christmas gift for my nephew. She knew he had an Xbox but had no clue which version it was so she didn't know which version of a game to get. I told her to just buy an Xbox store gift card and call it a day, much easier than trying to figure out which version of the console he had. Didn't want her to buy him a disc if he had the Series S.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

It's not like you can buy a 360 or One in the store though. They're selling two versions of the same model.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I have seen people very confused about which games will run on their system, though. Most are still cross compatible with XB1 and Series X, but some are Series X only now and the boxes aren't marked clearly enough for some people to tell the difference.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

What you didn’t like the meme name Xbox Series X? Xbox SeX?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago

I'm never gonna buy another console except steamdeck.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

I'm with you on that. What makes the Steam Deck so appealing is it's a handheld PC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Wow a 30% drop in revenue is quite something.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

It's pretty late in its life, could be that anyone who would be a potential sale got one at this point? I remember that being, at the time, the reason for the sharp decline in Ocarina of Time sales in Japan, they effectively sold one to everyone who has an N64 so they "maxed out".

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

According this chart from Ars Technica the switch and ps5 were still growing during the same period so then the question would be why the number of Xbox potential buyers is so much smaller than the others.

[-] Prox@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Wow, this is a really horrible graph. Ars has no clue how to visually convey information.

[-] hybridhavoc@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah I'm trying to look at this and understand almost anything from this and it's actually impossible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I'm biased but I really think Nintendo might be the last one standing in the system market in 2/3 gens

[-] bighatchester@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

I think PlayStation will still be around for the more high end games since Nintendo consoles are usually underpowered. And exclusive games

[-] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 13 points 2 months ago

I also can't imagine Nintendo's next console not being a mobile one so I think there's definitely a market for a traditional stationary console.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dlpkl@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Goes to show what a few good IPs and an all-star legal team can do for you lol

[-] AliasWyvernspur@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When Xcloud eventually (promises, promises, Phil) gets purchased games access, there'll be no need for the console anymore. Hell, PC gamers could (in theory, anyway) play GTA VI by buying the Xbox version and playing it on Xcloud (again, if purchased games comes to it, it's been promised for years).

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

I have no interest in my gaming experience being at the mercy of network latency. It's bad enough for online games, but there's no getting around that other than physically going to the same location as everyone else you are playing with. Big no for single player games. If cloud gaming does replace locally computed gaming, it will be another case of enshitification.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I have a buddy with a catering gig who works on film sets all over, an RV trailer with kitchen and a tv and Xbox in the back that we’d fire up in between meal times. No wifi when you’re filming a snowboarding video in the mountains …if they force that into every game then him and people like him will just stop buying new games altogether.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] piyuv@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

So… stadia?

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Someone at Microsoft thinks they can sell the expensive razor blades without selling razors. Probably why they purchased Activision.

It’s a shame because Microsoft made some interesting hardware for a while.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Well if they dropped the price of it a bit maybe more people would buy them.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago
[-] Peffse@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I'm really curious when Microsoft will start seeing the fruits of all their purchases. They've bought up a lot of game devs. Seems modern games cook for 3-4 years before publishing, so some might be turning up soon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I used the 360 as my main console back in the day because it was getting all the good games and multiplats usually ran better on it. I got a PS3 in late 2009 when the price dropped and it started getting worthwhile exclusives. When Microsoft tried to pull that always online crap with the One, they lost me forever. Since all of their games are on PC day one, there's even less reason for me to get one.

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

I personally would by a ps6 in a heartbeat, and likely the switch 2. I've bought an Xbox one which I sold after the dust on it got too much, and a series x whoch also never gets turned on. 2 gen burns in a row is enough for me to exclude it from my console purchase next gen.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Maybe that fact that nearly all first party games mid at best, you still have to pay a monthly fee for multiplayer games, the terrible UI and the fact that 1TB of extra harddrive space costs 200€ have something to do with it?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
132 points (90.2% liked)

Games

30520 readers
338 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS