this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
671 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The election fraud lawsuits have started again.

...

But Trump chose to stoke the flames Wednesday morning, posting on Truth Social that "Pennsylvania is cheating, and getting caught, at large scale levels rarely seen before."

"Law enforcement must act, NOW!" he added.

Bucks County officials confirmed to NBC Philadelphia that they had been notified of the lawsuit, but did not provide further comment. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, meanwhile, shot back at the Republican presidential nominee, highlighting that Trump and his allies have spent the last four years actively corroding public trust in U.S. elections---and that they are currently warming up their second conspiracy to undermine the 2024 election results.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 227 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Pennsylvania is cheating

How?

and getting caught

Where?

at large scale levels rarely seen before.

When?

"Law enforcement must act, NOW!"

By doing what exactly?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 133 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"Gish Gallop."

It's a debate technique. You overwhelm the opposition with an endless stream of half truths, exaggeration's, lies, and tangents that make it impossible for them to get their point across.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bannon during Trump's term referred to this as "flood the zone with shit". Essentially just putting out such a large volume of nonsense that people just give up, you break their will to vote/argue/oppose you/fight back/correct the record.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bannon is clearly advising Trump again, now that he’s out of jail.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see he's applying for a second term them.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He’s already waiting for another trial regarding defrauding people about funding the wall between the US and Mexico.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

Oh no, that poor dude. Anyway.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The thing that sucks is that it's so effective. It literally lead to Biden dropping out of the race. Trump spewed a bunch of bullshit really fast in their debate and Biden just froze up because it was so much.

I liked how Kamala handled it in their debate by basically saying "Look, I told you this guy was going to spout a bunch of nonsense." You've gotta call out the technique when you see it.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't watch the Biden debate, did the moderators fact-check?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Barely. It's almost impossible to fact check against the gish gallop technique, because Trump just spits out a dozen lies a minute.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You just call it for what it is, bullshit. Just call it out right there. "You may Gish Gallop as much as you wish, but I am going to talk policy to the people." Its fucken crazy anyone entertains that sewage.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's basically what Harris did during the debate. It was great!

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Trump made Biden scream “we beat Medicare” over and over? Biden didn’t face pressure to step down because he “froze up.” Don’t believe your lying eyes, I guess?

I legitimately can’t imagine why anyone would think the election would be going better right now if Biden hadn’t stepped down.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He didn't "scream" it, and he said it one time, clearly tripping two thoughts together.

Whatever else you might think about him or what that says about him, at least get that much right, lying about him "screaming" that "over and over" does nothing to help your point

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The clip I saw might have had a bad audio quality or something or I might just be misremembering, it sounded like yelling when I watched it the last time it was relevant (months ago, when he was still running). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Either way, pretending it didn't happen by way of downplaying it is ridiculous.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I stated a patently false thing that can be easily refuted as a fact, but you... YOU are being ridiculous!"

That's you. That's what you sound like right now.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sorry my obvious acknowledgment that my memory of the exact tone someone (who is no longer even a politics main character) used months ago could be faulty wasn’t good enough for you.

Doesn’t change that Biden said something obviously insane and had no idea how to recover from it on stage, or the incredibly obviously tepid enthusiasm voters had for a second Biden term, even in the face of a second Trump presidency.

[–] stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We see Trump consistently make an outright lie, and in the same breath pivot to a personal attack such as “she’s a nasty woman.” This is another technique that adds something controversial after the lie so that the focus is on the controversial topic instead of the lie.

It makes it harder to peel what he says apart and puts space between the current point of conversation and the lie

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The most fucked up thing is that Trump isn’t doing this necessarily intentionally. He’s just so crazy, that this is how his brain works.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

Trump once said that his personality hasn't changed since was a child.

He talks like a little kid; words just spew out without any rhyme or reason.

[–] stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I absolutely believe he is doing it intentionally. He will lie and promote violence any time he thinks it will help him do as he pleases or avoid consequences.

Yes, it’s in his very nature, but let’s be honest: he knows exactly what he’s doing

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I just can’t believe that he’s that intelligent or in control of the things coming out of his mouth.

[–] stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago

He can be a stupid, racist, sexist miser and evil at the same time. And there’s a 200% chance he’s not the smart one strategizing everything. He’s, as you say, not that smart. But smart enough to follow simple directions and regurgitate his hateful shit on cue.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He isn’t required to understand his behaviors in order to perform them. All his behaviors could have been shaped through early trial and error. Behaviors that got him a desired result became reinforced. He could’ve tried a lie+insult combo as a kid and got exactly what he wanted.

Repeated enough, the behavior could become second nature.

Its completely intentional. His supporters eat it up.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

bruh. he's not nearly that intelligent.

[–] stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

He doesn’t have to be intelligent; he just has to be smarter than his voters. That’s the point

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Sealioning is the layman’s unmoderated form. If you don’t let the other person speak or respond you always get to ‘win’.

It’s interesting how adversarial the nature of some people is.

[–] sudo 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or a more modern and apropos term, "shit spewing".

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Verbal diarrhea from Dysentery Donnie.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The only actual election interference I have heard about and people actually being charged is by the Republicans.

A lawsuit filed is not proof, I could file a lawsuit saying my neighbor stole my house. My house is still where it was but I could claim it's not and bring a lawsuit. I would lose but it's the principal of the fact that there is a suit that looks official and people think lawsuits means it's real.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

Anyone can sue anyone for anything in this country. It may get tossed out right away but you can still file the lawsuit.

The general talk is that since being shot at he’s even more impulsive than prior.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

didn't scientology win their religionship status because they flooded individuals at the IRS with thousands upon thousands of bullshit lawsuits? saying "this can all stop. it's up to you"

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Operation Snow White was a criminal conspiracy by the Church of Scientology during the 1970s to purge unfavorable records about Scientology and its founder, L. Ron Hubbard. This project included a series of infiltrations into and thefts from 136 government agencies, foreign embassies and consulates, as well as private organizations critical of Scientology, carried out by Church members in more than 30 countries. It was one of the largest infiltrations of the United States government in history, with up to 5,000 covert agents. This operation also exposed the Scientology plot "Operation Freakout", because Operation Snow White was the case that initiated the U.S. government's investigation of the Church.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They have mountains of evidence, stacked to the ceiling with all the evidence from the 2020 election and Hunter's laptops

[–] Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Floor to ceiling with birth certificates and emails

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Boxes and boxes of the stuff. All marked top secret. He's seen them too!

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

right by the shitter at mar a fucko

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

They have concepts of evidence. Many people said so, and the orange utan saw it on tv, or read it online. He's just reporting what people are saying

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

So this proof of election cheating is in Hunter Biden’s laptop? Makes about as much sense as any of this.

He’s likely shitting himself beyond the usual for not understanding Puerto Rican citizenship and voting.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

You see, he doesn't have evidence, but he has concepts of evidence.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I thought they were already getting caught?