this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
745 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 439 points 3 months ago (10 children)

CNN reports:

Helen told the Post that President Joe Biden tried to call her, but she declined to speak to him since her husband 'was a devout Republican, and he would not have wanted me to talk to him.'

But she added that she does not hold the current president responsible for what happened to her family.

'I don’t have any ill will towards Joe Biden,' she said. 'I’m not one of those people that gets involved in politics. I support Trump, that’s who I’m voting for, but I don’t have ill-will towards Biden.'

Let's see:

  1. Decides who to ignore calls from based on her husband's wishes

  2. Claims to not be involved in politics, yet supports a certain candidate

Yep, that's a garden-variety republican.

The important takeaway here is that Biden made an effort to reach out.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 190 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Ok my respect is quickly dropping for these buffoons caught in the crossfire. But it's like interviewing an attendee from a nazi rally, what should I expect? Critical thinking? Morals? Hah!

"devout Republican" haha... They're a religious cult.

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 95 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would you have any respect for Trump supporters going to a Trump rally? Just because they were unlucky? They're still shitty people.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a little more complicated for me considering my family once was Republican during Bush's first term. Rural, Appalachian, Pennsylvanian. I know some of these people most likely. Dumb people who know no better. Manipulated by rich interests. Feeling many pressures no doubt but too uninformed to point the finger at the right problem.

They Thought Were Free is a great book that explores this ignorance endemic in the Third Reich.

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ok, I get that you have a strong desire to humanize them. But humanizing someone doesn't mean you automatically respect them, other than affording them the basic level you'd give any other semi-sentient being. What is there to respect in people who cheer on an addlepated, narcissistic, fascist manbaby?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah I'll admit respect probably wasn't the best choice for words, but as a father I respected his shielding his family from bullets, which is probably what led to use of that word.

[–] bricklove@midwest.social 9 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the new word addlepated. It's like a fancy way to say shithead

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 86 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

People using devout to describe their political views unironically is the scariest thing I've read today.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

devout Republican

I had the same thought. It's not a sports team and not a religion. But man, some people treat it like that.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If your husband got killed by a fly ball at a baseball game and either coach called to give their condolences you'd accept the call.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Unless it was the Astros of course

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Conservatism is entirely an exercise in belief. Just like religion, if you apply logic to it, it falls apart.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 82 points 3 months ago (3 children)

One day she'll realize that after her husband was killed, the candidate she supports cared more about his shoes than about him.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sadly, she won't realize shit. These people don't have revelations about who they support politically. They bury their heads in the sand eternally. I still know people who are die hard George W Bush supporters and think he was the best president we've ever had.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I still know people who are die hard George W Bush supporters and think he was the best president we’ve ever had.

Honest question: do those folks say that because of how that campaign and presidency made them feel at the time, or is it honestly based in policy, politics, or something else tangible? Thank you.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, it's a mixed bag of all three. For some, the nostalgia of that time is very strong and for others they feel like GWB embodied the best of the Republican party(which says so much about the Republican party). And some are just bullshit contrarians who want to shut the people up who tout Obama and Biden's accomplishments.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the insightful reply. I appreciate it.

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Americans--especially those older--tend to hold favorable views of past presidents even if they didn't approve of them in office. W had a majority favorable opinion even among Democrats in 2018, and I wouldn't be surprised if the number were higher now.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 36 points 3 months ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one repeating this.

He was more concerned about his shoes than:

Following simple directions Getting off stage Acknowledging his staff was in danger Getting the fuck away from danger Asking about anyone else being injured Leaving the scene

You know....NORMAL FUCKING SHIT

But no, he needed to stand on stage AND at his get away vehicle to throw his fist up like he personally took down the gunmen.

I cringed watching the SS try to get him to safety and he refused. I was just hoping no one else was going to get shot while he tried to be some kind of "hero".

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

I think it’s also important to note that we didn’t hear about this from Biden’s camp. They did their job cause it was the right thing to do, not for some publicity stunt.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Devout Republican" is also pretty telling. These people aren't politically Conservative, they are religiously Republican. They worship their party and its leaders, and just like religion, they never require evidence for anything they believe.

Conservatism is not an ideology for smart people or critical thinkers.

[–] Gullible@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You can’t discount the selfish and hateful as stupid as even the most vile people can be cunning. I’d agree that the median conservative would be less intelligent than the median liberal, but that discludes the folks looking to take from others their money, freedom, and time in order to enrich themselves monetarily or psychologically. Not everything can be Hanlon’s razor’d, sometimes people just enjoy sucking.

[–] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 months ago
  1. Not involved in politics, simply supports the same party as her husband without questioning it

Just as the republicans want how women should vote?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Biden is a better man than Trump will ever be even with half his brain turned to jelly

[–] urquell@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which brain is jelly in this equation?