this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
496 points (98.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
3702 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 139 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The lengths people will go through to stop something that hurts nobody, but helps many always astounds me.

I have to credit some rando Redditor for the insight that helped me understand why these people do this. I'll paraphrase because I can't remember the exact prose.

Nearly all actions of Conservatives can be explained by their two implied core principles:

  1. All policies are zero sum. For you to gain something means I am losing something.
  2. There is a naturally occurring societal class-based hierarchy system, and you are required to stay at your level, never rising.

So the reason conservatives oppose student loan relief applies to both rules.

  1. If student loan borrowers are having debts forgiven (they are getting something) that MUST mean the conservative is losing something.
  2. If they had to take loans for school because they couldn't afford to pay for it outright, then they should stay in their economic station. Forgiving these loans may allow them to advance beyond their current class, which cannot be allowed.
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 62 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Which number 2 blows my mind as they constantly vote for things which benefit those well “above their station” because they think they’ll be there someday.

[–] lmaydev@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

"I'll be rich one day and then people like me will have to watch their step!"

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You can't change social class. Only I get to change social class. - Conservatives

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I don't believe conservatives are trying to argue they need to change their class. They just assume they are already the highest, and its some other group's fault that the conservative is poor.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

See rule 1: if you go up in class, then I must be going down in class.

[–] ElJefe@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My friend ran into a mutual acquaintance; dude’s now a majorly homophobic, anti trans, anti lgbtq, far right, freedumb convoy supporting redneck. You know the type. He’s ranting about how social programs need to be defunded and all the gays do is take and don’t contribute. My buddy then goes “so anyway, how’ve you been?” Dude says “oh I’m great! I got laid off so now I’m on employment insurance.”

Their hypocrisy and tone deafness know no bounds.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 3 months ago

I hate those kinds of people so much...

I had a coworker like that too. Would argue any Democrat proposal was communism and absolutely terrible. Then he took paid family leave for 2 months when he had a kid, came back, and said "man that was great, I went snowboarding for 2 months while wifey stayed home with the baby. See? That's why this is bad!"

It's bad because you're an asshole?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

because they think they’ll be there someday.

Sadly, I think its even worse than you're describing. They think they are at that higher station now and its rule #1 that is preventing them from actualizing it. As in "I'm not experiencing a luxurious lifestyle because Group X is taking my share".

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's even that anymore. I think it's just genuine fawning sycophancy towards their "betters." They think privileged people deserve even more privilege by virtue of having "won," even at their own expense. It's sick and psychotic and completely foreign to my way of thinking, but I don't think I'm wrong.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You are wrong though. The reason we can't understand it is they are being manipulated. Christians in particular have made themselves vulnerable, purposefully. Just go back to your Sunday school days and if you didn't have them listen to the TV preachers in earnest. They are the sheep, they are being led. I'm not trying to be offense it's just the facts. Even the trumpers who are church adverse fall for similar structures. Usually satellites of the church at large. Biggest facet I can think of is the gun nuts. It's basically religion. In the 2A they trust. The overlap of the church gives them the same structure. Making them vulnerable to manipulation.

You and me too though. We just kinda sweep it under the rug. We let our phones run our lives. We feed on dopamine hits all day everyday.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 5 points 3 months ago

Or they think that the people above their station deserve those benefits--they genuinely think and support the rich getting richer is a good thing, regardless of whether they'll see any benefit themselves. It's the mirror image of the progressive mindset of voting to raise their own taxes to help the needy.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Not really as much as I feel we think. Having read more about Authoritarian mindsets, which includes the rank and file authoritarians, not just the leadership, they're actually happy to be reinforcing the hierarchy regardless of their position in it. They're happy to know their place and to ensure the ranks are kept in place. It brings comfort to many people to know that their position, regardless of how awful it is, is being maintained properly.

This means that they're entirely okay with a dictator and/or an oligarchy as long as the people on the top are "supposed" to be there.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

As Voltaire said: "The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor."

The idea broadly underpins modern capitalism, and it sums up why liberal politicians (whether left or right wing) do nearly everything they do. Democratic liberals want to keep the lower classes at least somewhat happy by throwing them scraps from time to time, while Republican liberals will only ever do just enough to keep the lower classes pacified.

[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Almost all the quality of life in the US is at the expense of the real global poor. Even our american minimum wage workers going into debt, living paycheck to paycheck actually live a life of privilege compared to billions despite the perceived suffering.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You're not wrong at all. I also don't think your analysis is incompatible with what I said above, either. Unless, that is, that you're saying that no one should have a right to complain unless they have it worse than everyone else.

American hegemony as practiced by US liberal politicians, in service of capital, is one of the primary drivers of the issue you're describing.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget cruelty. If you aren't in their circle or above it's also about cruelty.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Thats built into #2. If your station is low enough, you should expect to endure cruelty. Its your station after all...is their implied position.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Fun fact, in the 1920s a high caste Indian man sued the US for the right to naturalize arguing that he was white. Arguing that he was verifiably genetically pure because of his caste and descendant from the Aryans.

The Supreme Court, 9 old white dudes, decided that he didn't look white enough to be white. And so he wasn't white, and denied him the right to naturalize.

'murica

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I don't know about the second one, that one sounds like left fan fiction, but #1 is absolutely true.

As #2 I'd put "If something bad happened to you, IE student debt, it's your fault so you should be punished. If something bad happens to me, it's bad luck or societies fault, therefore I need help."