this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
626 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

10940 readers
1763 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/1104168

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 175 points 3 months ago (4 children)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Any chance you know the canon explanation of how they counteract the gravity generated by the Deathstar's mass?

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 74 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How much gravity would the Deathstar’s mass provide? I feel like it would be very small considering it has no real massive central solid or liquid core.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's the size of a moon and made from metal: It's definitely generating some gravity (even a small amount of mass generates gravity) but I guess whatever tech they use to generate gravity overcomes it.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 69 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's the size of a very, very small moon, and mostly hollow.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 47 points 3 months ago

I should call her

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah the fact it's called a small moon is slightly deceptive to us because our moon is absolutely huge as far as moons go. The natives of the SW universe would be used to much much smaller moons.

For reference, our moon is 3475km across and the death star is 150km across, so it's diameter is 23 smaller. It's also weighed at about 900million tonnes or 9*10^14kg.

If I'm right (which I'm likely not). g=(GM)/r² or g=(6.66710^-119*10^13)/75².

That's a gravity of 1.086x10^-5m/s² or if I round with pure disrespect for physics, 100,000 times weaker than earth's gravity. Essentially it's totally negligible compared to their artificial gravity. Hell, I don't even think a marble on the floor would overcome it's own grip and roll towards the center of the space station.

My maths is almost certainly wrong somewhere here, I failed it badly.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Our moon is huge for a planet of Earth's size, but not compared to the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn.

Last time I looked it up, I used Pluto's moons as a reference because some of them are smaller than DS1, but Charon is quite a bit bigger. Based on the shapes of Pluto's moons, I think even if DS1 were solid it would still be too small to compact itself into a sphere with its own gravity.

Fun fact: Charon is even more huge relative to Pluto (just over 50% of Pluto's diameter) than Luna is compared to Earth (about 25% of Earth's diameter).

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

fun fact, pluto and charon are technically a binary planet(oid), because the point they orbit is in-between them. (Charon doesn't orbit Pluto, they both circle empty space)

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pluto has more than one satellite?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Must have missed that. Cool!

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I mean, we mostly only have info on our solar system for moon sizes. We could easily be an oddball, although it's not good science to assume we're special in any way.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

So small that a natural body of that size probably wouldn't be massive enough to hold a spherical shape. DS1 was a little smaller than the real asteroid 128 Nemesis, which isn't spherical. Maybe if it were made of something extremely dense, it would be, but you're not likely to find a natural spherical object that size.

Now that I think of it, this puts the "that's no moon" scene in perspective. Luke is a country bumpkin who just calls it a moon, but Obi-wan has an idea of its size (perhaps from glancing at the Falcon's scans, since size and distance is hard to judge by eye; or he's just a space wizard), and knows a natural object couldn't be that spherical.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Unless the object formed as a sphere of molten water in the vacuum goldilocks zone, then froze into an huge sphere of ice as the star cooled.

[–] butter@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It wouldn't need to generate gravity.

Acceleration "down" would be enough.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Only if it was undergoing constant acceleration, which we know it to be incapable of.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

It’s got sublight thrusters and steering doesn’t it? It could just fly around and around a circular path.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I mean, those are equivalent forces. Gravity doesn't actually exist as a separate force, just like acceleration isn't a magical force appearing from nowhere.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I ran the numbers, and it says about 0.00473m^2^2

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 63 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The gravity is negligible. The official sizes of the Death Stars have been 120 - 900 km in diameter according to rebel scale. For comparison, Earths moon is ≈3500~~0~~ km in Idiameter, and its gravity is 1/6 of earth’s. On top of that, the Death Stars are mostly hallow, being a metal framework, instead of solid rock.

[–] nadiaraven@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

the Death Stars are mostly hallow

Our Death Star, who art in heaven,

Hallowed be thy name,

Thy empire come, thy will be done,

On Alderaan as it is in heaven,

Give us this day our daily rations,

And forgive us our rebellion,

As we forgive those who rebel against us,

And lead us not to the light side,

But deliver us from the Jedi,

For thine is the empire, and the unlimited power, and the dark side forever,

Amen

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

If Lemmy had gold, I'd give it to you.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Earths moon is ≈35000 km in diameter, and it’s gravity is 1/6 of earth’s.

Off the a factor of 10. The Moon has a diameter of almost 3500 km (Earth's circumference is about 40,000 km, so your diameter would make the Moon larger than Earth).

However, the Death Star being mostly filled with air still means you're probably right about gravity being negligible.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Whoops. Good catch! so about 4-30 times the size of the Death Star. That would mean the gravity of the Death Star is at most 1/24th that of earth’s, if it were solid rock and my math is correct. That’s at the surface, though. As you go inside, gravity will decrease until you reach the center where there will be no gravity at all because all the mass of the space station is pulling you away from the center equally. (assuming a uniform mass distribution).

g ≈ M/r^2
V ≈ r^3.
uniform density: ρ for simplicity’s sake
M = ρV
—> g ≈ ρr where r is the distance from the center of the death star, but no further than the surface

[–] finley@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It’s not massive enough to create its own gravity. They use gravity deck plating.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 44 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Even if it was massive enough, if they can keep people sticking to the ground in a tiny ship they can surely counteract the gravity of a space station.

Also, most of their spaceships have wings. We're thinking about this way too hard.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They don't all have wings. Only the X-Wing and Imperial transport ships have actual wings, and we've seen them fly through atmospheres.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, but we've also seen the ones that look like a hamburger patty fly through the atmosphere (and, in fact, outmaneouver the winged ones). Clearly that's not what they're for.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ah yeah. Dang. Well there probably a good technical reason behind it. I'm no starship engineer in the Star Wars universe.

[–] remus989@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I think the usual in universe reasoning is heat dissipation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are clearly not wings meant to create aerodinamic lift.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well, no, they're meant to make the pew-pew laser fights look like a film about airplane dogfights. So yeah, way overthinking it.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You’re here discussing it too, man

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago

Oh, yeah, no, but that's because I'm a nerd.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically everything with mass creates its own gravitational field; most things just aren't massive enough for it to be detectable.

[–] Ageroth@reddthat.com 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

One of my favorite science facts: Because of how the strength of gravity diminishes as you get further away and stronger as you get closer, when you approach to within arms length of another person (approx 1m) the gravitational attraction between the two masses of your bodies can exceed the gravitational attraction between your body and the sun at any given time.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

When the inverse square law and weak gravitational forces meet

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Where I end and you begin

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Another fun property of the inverse square law is that an infinite sheet of mass produces a gravitational field that is equally strong no matter how far you are from it.

It applies to any form of flux, like sound amplitude or light intensity.

This is why when you’re sitting on top of Mount Sanitas, you can hear traffic sounds at seemingly full volume. It’s just all the traffic of Boulder, which is roughly like an infinite sheet below you.

This is despite being unable to hear any given car more than a couple blocks away.

It’s also why if Superman flies over manhattan at night, he’s lit from underneath with an amount of light similar to someone who’s 10 feet from a skyscraper.

[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, but no one can escape the gravitational field of your mom.

(Sorry, couldn't resist, as I half expected your comment to end with a "your mom" joke)

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

“Gravity deck plating”… okay that makes sense. So basically each floor has its own gravity generation to orient you to it. They’re all placed “bottom to top” to work like a building but it’d be possible to put one in at a 90-degree angle for say maintenance work.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Like in the Falcon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Artificial gravity and inertial compensators are pervasive (if relatively handwaved/unexplained) in the SW universe

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Hoverpads have fully replaced wheels and datapads have fully replaced paper, even in the poorest most remote communities.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Damn this makes the OSHA holes even more ridiculous

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Bingo. See also, the guys in the laser shaft for the main cannon. The beam fires along / past them. Not from below.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't the emperor's tower and all the surface guns oriented toward the second option?

Seems like it's a little of both

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

That's only at the top of the death star.