107
Pulling out
Lol, that is funny because it also describes a sexual act that happens frequently in pornography. What clever wordplay there old bean!
On one side, good riddance because porn is an extraordinarily exploitive industry and pornhub is at the forefront of that so fuck them and fuck the porn industry.
On the other side, fuck these states because sex work is real work and this will only further hurt and alienate an already extremely marginalized group of vulnerable people.
I don't know which side I feel stronger about. Hexbear struggle session; commence!
Afaik it's just legislation requiring stuff like ID which leads to PornHub pulling out because they don't want to pay operation fees, so all of the exploitative parts of the porn industry will still be there, just without anyone actually observing the products of it
Or in other terms it's not really good or bad, it's just a company being cheap as usual (which is usually bad, but in this case is just meh)
How do you say that as if it is so simple to scan the ID of every person who visits your website. First and foremost is that the US doesn't even have an actual citizen ID system. It has a patchwork of different government programs which are meant to be different things that it uses for ID. A driver's license is meant to say whether you can drive, it's not supposed to be an ID. Secondly, every state has a different driver's license design, which also doesn't make any sense. Why doesn't the US give people a national driver's license?
Thirdly how is a canadian company supposed to have the technology to scan american drivers license. In real life when you buy alcohol or cigarettes it kind of makes sense because the gas station attendant can like look the id and then the person and then shrug their shoulders. Do you want the website to also scan the face of every visitor to compare it to the ID? How can the website know that the ID is not counterfeit?
Porn websites do not have the technology to scan government IDs for every single visitor. Logistically it is not possible. What would be needed is a third party website operated by each state government that can scan each ID and then signal the verification back to the porn website through API. Each state knows this and they don't care because their intention is not actually requiring IDs to be scanned, it is to obstruct porn sites from existing. Also since each state is going to individually have to operate their own ID scanning service, that means each state will also be maintaining a gooner database.
In fact, Lousiana was the first state to require porn sites to ID every visitor. You will notice that Louisiana is not colored in red on the map of the OP. That's because Louisiana provided pornhub with the technology to scan IDs. The other states did not provide pornhub with the necessary ID scanning technology and thats why they got blocked. Louisiana is not blocked.
lmao
just pay a decent amount for someone who's actually qualified to look at the ID's manually
I know for a fact they can afford hundreds of people like that. They just choose not to because it costs way more money than just pulling out of a state.
See Facebook being moderated by underpaid traumatized people for a similar real life example of a similar system. The only reason Pornhub doesn't do something like that is because the kind of person who knows how to verify US ID's probably can't be turned into basically free labor because they probably cost more on average to employ
A government ID is a proprietary information of each state. If someone showed you an ID from Montana would you know what each number and feature on the ID meant? No, you wouldn't because IDs are a way for the government to ID a citizen and not everything known about an ID is available to the public. In order for a website to be able to scan an ID, the state needs to provide the website with the appropriate software. If you buy alcohol at the grocery store, the grocery store uses state-issued software to scan the ID.
Texas as example passed a law which said that people are now allowed to sue pornhub for not scanning IDs and yet Texas did not give pornhub the necessary software to scan IDs. The intention was purely to manufacture a scenario for people of Texas to sue pornhub.
In the instance of facebook, I'm not sure that facebook actually scans the id, they just store a picture of it. Do you want every porn site to store photos of every ID of every visitor. What if the website gets hacked?
are we pretending these companies don't have the ability to just buy the creation of said software from the government? no matter the way you paint it it's still just them being cheap. nothing more, nothing less.
I'm not sure what you're not understanding about "all 50 states have different proprietary ID designs". Proprietary as in, secret, as in unknown to the public, as in you can't just make the software yourself. As in, each of these states are intentionally hiding the information because they don't want pornhub to be able to actually ID visitors. The answer to your question is "no". No they can't just pay the government for that software.
As I said, they already worked out a system with Louisiana. Louisiana actually cooperated. The other states are not cooperating. The other states are right wing dominated states that are being obtuse on purpose.
they literally can though. US politicians are famously buyable
they literally can though. US politicians are famously buyable
This is the most absurd, ahistoric line of magical thinking that I've read in weeks. Why does pornhub simply not just buy politicians at the politician store? A real head scratcher, I'm really thonking now.
The answer is so simple. In the states that pornhub has blocked, the religious lobby and christian nationalists have more political power and capital than the porn industry. Every one of the states highlighted in red has a long history of sexual repression.
In Utah, a 1973 law made it illegal to have premarital sex until 2019, punishable by a misdemeanor and $1000 fine.
In Texas, it is illegal to buy or sell any dildo or artificial vagina sex toy.
In North Carolina, it is illegal for a man/woman couple to live in the same house if they are not married (cohabitation).
These are only a few examples. The states colored in red on the map have long history of discrimination against LGBT people, laws limiting or banning abortion, laws making it harder to divorce an abusive spouse, etc.
Here's a map of states that have banned access to gender affirming care for transgender people. It's literally the same states that have been blocked by pornhub. This map shows that 25 states have banned gender affirming care. 10 of the 12 states which have been blocked by pornhub also have banned access to gender affirming care.
https://www.hrc.org/resources/attacks-on-gender-affirming-care-by-state-map
Here's a map of states which have banned or heavily restricted abortion access. The map shows 21 states have banned or highly restricted access to abortion. Oh it's the same map again. 9 of 12 states which have been blocked by pornhub have banned or extremely limited access to abortions.
https://www.cnn.com/us/abortion-access-restrictions-bans-us-dg/index.html
Here's a map of states where gay marriage is prohibited by the state constitution, although protected by federal law (for now). Same map again? What are the odds? 11 of the 12 states which have been blocked by pornhub also ban gay marriage in their state constitution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_law_in_the_United_States_by_state
that is a lot of sources, I concede defeat
I feel like all this actually does is turn people to porn sites that don't care as much about following the law.
Which seems bad.
Yeah that's generally the argument against abolition of pretty much anything in a capitalist society. Abolition just means people turn to less safe / reliable / reputable sources for the thing being abolished. Without addressing the systemic issues behind why the thing being abolished is a problem, it just makes it work. This is true for sex work or drugs or basically anything, I think.
Feel strongly about both of them simultaneously. It's not as contradictory as you think!
Perfect answer. Some people on here can get really weird on this issue, when it is in fact that simple
Look I really just wanted to struggle session about something that isn't outdoor cats or olive oil okay 
How about you have a struggle session with deez nuts
I only struggle with 
Bleeding Kansas
Gooning Kansas
C'mon, Breeding Kansas was right there
STOP RIGHT THERE, CRIMINAL SCUM! THIS WAS A STING OPERATION!
Marrying a child is a god given right, pinko scum. But if you think I’m gonna allow adult breasts being shoved in my face, you got another thing coming. Go back to Europe!
Civil War (2024)
Mike Johnson will be happy he won't have to spank his Johnson anymore and notify his son he broke his volcel oath.
It's getting removed in DC?
This image brought to you by NordVPN.
wtf is going on with the Aleutians in this map
Loooooooooooooooooooooong Alaska
Just a bit excited... stop staring!
They're out of a few states already right
Can confirm from arkansas
they're pulling out of Chef Mimal's ass 
I was taught that he was a gnome.
no shot, he's got KENTUCKY fried chicken with Tennessee as a plate
Calling it, Mindgeek is going to start a VPN service that mainly advertises in these states. They certainly have the infrastructure to do so.
Pun intended
I mean who gives a fuck, no one is ever going to NOT have porn
the evil wokes want to take my pencil and paper so I can't draw boobies...
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
107 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13293 readers
887 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS