this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
290 points (99.3% liked)

Programming

17020 readers
261 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This article makes for an interesting read. Here follow two early paragraphs for context:

Oracle controls the JavaScript trademark because in 2009 it acquired Sun Microsystems, which applied to trademark the name with the US Patent and Trademark Office back in 1995. The trademark was granted in 2000.

While the database giant does not use the name for any commercial products, its ownership of the trademark has led JavaScript-oriented organizations such as events biz JSConf to adopt branding that avoids the term. As the signatories to the letter observe, the world's most popular programming language therefore can't have a conference that mentions what it's about.

Toward the end, the article mentions an initiative to legally pursue Oracle for trademark abandonment.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I'm still not over the utter destruction of Sun by fucking Oracle.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Javascript? What's that? I only know of ECMA-262-ECMAScript, rolls right off the tongue!

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Just call it Ecmascript and be done with it. The name JavaScript was misleading from the beginning. Well, Ecma sounds like a skin disease but who cares.

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago

"I need some more [input] sanitizer for my eczema script, the console is red and inflamed whenever I check it."

[–] lkdm@programming.dev 19 points 1 day ago

Ecmascript is classic, but WebScript might be better going forward.

[–] Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago

Writing it also feels as nice as a skin disease so it's fitting well.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SmegmaScript is just too close

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

SmegHeadScript

kryten

This is the solution.

All names have problems but this one has the least.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like the modern name for it would be just "Script".

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

That's way too broad. Scripting is a pretty broad concept.

[–] aticmel@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

but then we have a massive problem that affects millions of people if we call it EcmaScript. POJO becomes POEO, which violates English. Anyone speaking or writing English is negatively affected by the change from POJO to POEO. We should definitely pay Oracle billions of dollars to avoid confusing people about whether it's POI-oh or POYO... keep it POJO.

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oracle can suck it

Piece of shit company

Piece of shit owner

I could believe that a man could build a suit using arc energy technology. And I could believe that man could use that energy to kill aliens from outer space.

But I could not believe that same man would ever use Oracle Cloud for his compute.

Literally made Iron Man unwatchable.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison

[–] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 48 points 1 day ago

Cool! Oracle, a company famous for making good-will decisions, and open to being "urged" into doing the right thing. 🙄

I suppose the open letter is a nice gesture, and I hope that the petition to cancel the trademark succeeds.

[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Fuck Oracle, we use them for our org and holy fuck, slow to respond, hire people that don't know how to do their job or just don't do it.

Waste of fucking money and air.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only thing worse than Oracle are Oracle sales people.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

oracles lawyers are pretty bad too

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Oracle CEOs are pretty bad too

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

Oracle Sales Lawyers are the worst

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

I put the lawyers under Oracle since they are the physical manifestation of the corporation. Think of Oracle as "crack" and Oracle Sales as "crack dealers". Each horrible in their own special way.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

favorite JavaScript reference docs MDN

meanwhile Mozilla bails on fedi

hardly knew ya

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In one fell swoop they managed to gobble up quite a lot of FOSS projects, triggering quite a lot of forks...

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago
[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Sun Solaris was my first *nix, and I have very strong memories of hanging out in the cluster of Sun machines as well as running a remote x window session from whatever overlocked Celeron win2k machine I had in my dorm at the time.

[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Oracle, where the best technologies go to die.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it's such a problem, maybe we just collectively move on to ES or TypeScript nomenclature?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Typescript and JavaScript are different languages and the distinction is important, especially because the two are used in conjunction with each other.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Especially because TypeScript compiles down to ~~JavaScript~~ JS

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah but why would you ever use javascript instead of typescript.

Don't answer that. 😂

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

Because I'm a browser and I can't read typescript.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For an application? Never. I'd still use it for something very small like a build script where the hassle of separate compile and run stages makes the whole thing a hassle to use. That might change now, though, since I think Node has gained the ability to execute Typescript directly.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 1 day ago

Been using vite for a while and haven't had to think about it.

Glad node is catching up. But it'd spare even more headaches if it natively supported ES6 modules

The article mentions that the letter indicated intent to petition with the USPTO to cancel the Javascript trademark due to abandonment. Hopefully that is successful since that seems to be the best outcome short of Oracle willingly forfeiting it.