this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
216 points (95.8% liked)

politics

18960 readers
4543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Don’t worry. Although Congress is at a standstill without a speaker for the first time in American history, Rep. Matt Gaetz said that everything is going according to his “plan.”

During an appearance on Meet the Press, Gaetz — who led the effort to oust Rep. Kevin McCarthy from his position as speaker of the House — defended his actions, even though they have left Congress “paralyzed,” according to Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton, in the face of an unprecedented attack against Israel.

“You led this effort to oust Speaker McCarthy without a clear replacement in place,” Meet the Press host Kristen Welker said to Gaetz during Sunday’s broadcast. “Was that irresponsible on your part?”

“Not only do we have a clear replacement, we have two,” Gaetz said, referring to GOP Reps. Steve Scalise and Jim Jordan who are vying for the top leadership position in the House. “We have two men who are incredibly respected.” Jordan has been accused of covering up sexual assault allegations as wrestling coach at Ohio State; Scalise reportedly once likened himself to ex-Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke “without the baggage” and spoke at a 2002 white supremacist conference organized by a hate group Duke founded.

“But you don’t have a choice and it’s not clear either of them have enough votes,” Welker said to Gaetz.

“I think that in a two-man race, it’s a lot easier to get someone to 50 percent plus one than in a race where you have three, four, five, seven people,” Gaetz replied. “So the fact that it’s been a constrained race, you are watching the plan play out.”

Welker to Gaetz: "You voted for those tax cuts under the Trump administration which helped create that $8 trillion deficit that you're talking about right there. Did you not? Is this not as some of your critics would say hypocritical?" pic.twitter.com/gG8DntYrke — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) October 8, 2023

In addition to Scalise and Jordan, some MAGA Republicans have floated Donald Trump himself as a candidate for the role. Trump refused to step in and try to save McCarthy as his speakership was threatened. Sources close to the former president told Rolling Stone that Trump said behind closed doors that McCarthy’s fate was “up to him.”

Welker also questioned Gaetz about efforts to remove him from Congress: “I have been speaking to some of your Republican colleagues and you know that there are discussions about potentially kicking you out of Congress… If you lose your job will it be worth it?”

“Absolutely,” Gaetz said. “Look, I am here to fight for my constituents. And I’m here to ensure that America’s not on a path to financial ruin. Your average American family right now is spending $700 more each and every month for the same household goods and services… We’re spending $7 trillion a year and only taking in $5 [trillion]. So to me, people who are willing to drive $2 trillion annual deficits are the agents of chaos. The people who want budgets are actually agents of regular order.”

Welker pounced at this, pointing out that Gaetz is responsible for a portion of the deficit by voting for Trump’s tax cuts. “Congressman, respectfully, you voted for those tax cuts under the Trump administration, which helped create that $8 trillion deficit that you’re talking about right there, did you not?” Welker said. “Is this not, as some of your critics would say, hypocritical, given that?”

“No, I voted against ten continuing resolutions during the Trump era,” Gaetz said.

“But you voted for the tax cuts,” Welker retorted.

“I actually voted against the budget that created the platform for the reconciliation of those tax cuts because it didn’t balance,” Gaetz said. “I agreed with Senator Rand Paul at the time that we should do the tax cuts with offsets and balanced budgets.”

But Gaetz acknowledged right before he voted for it that the tax bill would increase the deficit at the time of the vote in 2017. “Certainly in the early years, this tax cut will negatively affect the deficit,” he said on MSNBC at the time.

The tax cuts ultimately benefited corporate America to the tune of billions of dollars in profits while lowering taxes for middle-wage earners by only $65 a month — far short of the windfall Trump and the GOP promised. By 2027, the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy reported, the tax burden for working-class wage earners will increase as the cuts phase out. Maybe that, too, was all part of Gaetz’s grand “plan.”

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

Someone should check his ties with Hamas. Triggering an action that hamstrings the House at a time when a surprise attack against an ally that benefits Russia comes through.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 43 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The plan he got from Putin, more likely.

[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How long before the GOP is united in its support for hamas? I have always wondered how the GOP would deal with Russia’s Iranian allies when things came to a head. There are lots of wedges trying to break the GOP. Having to support hamas because they are a Russian ally might be the biggest one ever.

Gonna be a wild couple weeks I think.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Republicans are generally much more in favor of the other evil side. On fact, they tend to be the supporters of Israel. They're the reason we give them so much aid and ignore their actions. There's a lot of information online if you're interested in how they got to that point, but basically the Israelis have courted republican leadership for a long time, and I doubt that's going to change.

[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That’s the point. Hamas and Iran are increasingly Russia aligned. If Israel and Russia have both bought and paid for the party, what’s gonna give?

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, American support for Israel is rooted in Imperialism. None of our elected officials seem to want a peaceful solution.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

Oh is child rapist Matt Gaetz fucking some more kids while slamming dick pills then? That plan?

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

“Not only do we have a clear replacement, we have two,” Gaetz said

Sooo... not a clear replacement, then. I know that everything he said is stupid, but that quote particularly annoyed me for some reason.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago

America isn’t a 14 year old, why is he trying to fuck us so hard?

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Remember- he also planned on banging underage girls.

[–] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So now our lower chamber of Congress is in stalemate because of a man whose only notable achievements are being universally hated and grooming young girls.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

None of those republicans care he bangs kids. After all, most of them have banged kids.

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

Not paying America's bills is not a plan, it is failure.

Stop voting for Republicans, they don't believe in our democracy.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

"You are watching the plan play out."

🫣

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 14 points 11 months ago

That is the intent, yes. Bring down the government so they can replace it with a dictatorship. I've posted about the "Red Caesar" plan before, and I can find the Guardian article discussing it if needed.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

How could anyone trust Matt Gaetz given how publicly ghoulish he is at literally every waking moment?

[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What is this pedophile's plan exactly? Shit America's bed and get away with molesting kids?

Just like daddy Putin likes.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The next Governor of Florida. Desantis is term limited, and the state has had a large GOP influx because of antivax and culture war policies, so the seat is open to whatever alt right shithead makes the most noise at this point.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So Florida can actually get worse, is what you're saying.

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

They've already got bottom and have started digging, yes.

[–] Buelldozer 8 points 11 months ago

The only thing that sucks more than Gaetz plan is Gaetz himself.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Vote Democrats if you want to still see America, struggle, but still go on.

Vote Republicans if you want to see America die faster.

[–] normonator@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

The only plan I would believe he has is shitting himself and saying it was on purpose.

That guy has fuck all rattling around up there that why he preys on kids.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So to me, people who are willing to drive $2 trillion annual deficits are the agents of chaos.

This also includes the wealthy business interests that finance the campaigns of Gaetz and others like him.

[–] Jaeger86@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

He just wants more time off to do coke

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

“The Democrats made me do this!”

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A cynic might suggest that it's not a coincidence that congress is paralyzed just as an Iranian proxy launches an attack on Israel, thereby endangering the US-Saudi deal which was about to be finalized. A deal that would significantly damage Iran, China and Russia's interests, would have lowered oil prices (which would also hurt Russia and GOP chances in the coming election). And oh, oops. Everyone's distracted from Ukraine.

But hey, far be it for me to call these people traitors. I'm sure Matt Gaetz is a patriotic paedophile.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Some might even call it his "final solution"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Seems like Groomer Gaetz is about as beloved as Ted Cruz.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Why is the word "But" in the headline?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Dems should find a moderate among those NY and Cali republicans that need aisle crossing cred and offer to back one of them for the speakership in exchange for a "keep the lights on" coalition.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


During an appearance on Meet the Press, Gaetz — who led the effort to oust Rep. Kevin McCarthy from his position as speaker of the House — defended his actions, even though they have left Congress “paralyzed,” according to Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton, in the face of an unprecedented attack against Israel.

“You led this effort to oust Speaker McCarthy without a clear replacement in place,” Meet the Press host Kristen Welker said to Gaetz during Sunday’s broadcast.

“Not only do we have a clear replacement, we have two,” Gaetz said, referring to GOP Reps. Steve Scalise and Jim Jordan who are vying for the top leadership position in the House.

Welker also questioned Gaetz about efforts to remove him from Congress: “I have been speaking to some of your Republican colleagues and you know that there are discussions about potentially kicking you out of Congress… If you lose your job will it be worth it?”

“Congressman, respectfully, you voted for those tax cuts under the Trump administration, which helped create that $8 trillion deficit that you’re talking about right there, did you not?” Welker said.

By 2027, the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy reported, the tax burden for working-class wage earners will increase as the cuts phase out.


The original article contains 708 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] freecandy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I bet his plan involves little boys

[–] Cjwii@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm so glad that we have such a brave leader in Matt Gartz. We'd be truly lost without his guidance and strength

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

You forgot the /s.