this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
260 points (85.5% liked)

Science Memes

11243 readers
3210 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago
[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago

I'd like to see this redone using energy instead of power. E.g is 2,400 watts during the initial heatup or when the oven reaches stable temperature? They're not taking into account the time change either.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 24 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I thought this was going to be about how many turkeys you could cook directly using the reactor heat

my disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined

[–] Dohnuthut@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Glad to know I'm not the only one!

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 2 points 8 hours ago

A typical turkey feeds 12 people? Doubt. Perhaps enough for 12 portions - but that isn’t the same as 12 people get fed off this one bird.

[–] wasabi@feddit.org 12 points 13 hours ago

How is this a meme?

[–] ToothpasteSundae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Can we also talk about the way they chose to manipulate the perception of the data by their choice of states

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

There are states with populations higher than 30 million. Like yea that's a lot of people, but the cherry picking of states is annoying

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

LOL, it's a reverse population map. Works on the stupid because "lots of orange!"

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if they claim a 15lb Turkey feeds 12, how am I supposed trust any of the other numbers?

[–] hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Or how 1 GW/(200 W/person) came up with a number that started with a 3 instead of a 5. Like 5 million people, not 30 million.

[–] Ropianos@feddit.org 2 points 12 hours ago

But it only takes 3.5 hours per turkey and a day has 24 of them. So if some people get up at 3am it works out!

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 21 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The fun part of this is this is true of any 1GW power source. We have been deploying solar+battery arrays in that range recently for much less money and much faster than nuclear.

Thanks "Office of nuclear energy" for pointing out how useful large scale solar+battery is too!

[–] AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world 38 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Rookie Numbers. It only uses electrical power generated. Why not cook turkeys in heat destined for cooling towers ? Gotta push those numbers way up.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Or just toss all the turkeys into the reactor

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 hours ago

Turkey control rods

[–] eldain@feddit.nl 7 points 11 hours ago

Restricted sous-vide basin

[–] passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I really don't get this ackshually business about nuclear power, we're absolute idiots to not employ it more. Everywhere there's been a focus on nuclear power generation we're seeing reliable results over a long long timespan

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Lemmy keeps telling me nuclear power is stupid. I've been screaming for more going on 30-years now. 🤷

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe because we still don't have a solution for the waste which kills people generations after your death?

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

We've had multiple solutions for a long time. Name me some people who have been killed by nuclear waste. Other than Chernobyl I bet you can't. How does it feel repeating decades old fossil fuel propaganda?

Can I get some references that compare nuclear waste vs coal, gas, solar, wind waste and emissions?

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Now calculate how many generations of turkeys will be eaten till the waste stops killing people

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

How many people has all the waste we've produced kill up to now?

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 3 points 17 hours ago

The real question is how many nuclear reactors a turkey could cook.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

If people didn't all turn their oven on at the same time but took more of a staggered approach this would supply a lot more people.

[–] hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's already wrong even for realistic staggered dinners.

I think they are using an arbitrary GW-day of energy instead of power, so it can't even come close to making as much turkey as claimed.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

They're over by a factor of 6 which would add up to 21 hours, not 24. I don't know what they've done to get 2.5 million, it should be 417 thousand with those numbers.

Edit: Oh dear. They said each oven could completely cook 6 turkeys in a day so they rounded to that number. At least it no longer reads GW/day.
The source

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Time zones probably help with that!

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee -2 points 11 hours ago

in a country where half of the presidents cant even pronounce nukular....and the only usecase for nukular is make some machines like openAI work cheaper. go eat the nukular waste george.