this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
157 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22011 readers
3951 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PeripheralGhost@lemmy.world 78 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Basically all I've seen from this administration is what they're against (healthcare, education, diversity, environment/climate, science, equity, inclusion, regulations, etc.), but like, are they for anything besides the antithesis of those?

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 54 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 14 hours ago

Billionaires hoarding wealth, and slavery.

[–] PeripheralGhost@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I mean they literally called their campaign "the revenge tour." There's nothing they want to build because a fascist regime like this already has everything they need: huge amounts of capital, channels to pipe out propaganda, and hoards of mindless hate-filled followers, all of them armed to the teeth.

"What else is on the agenda" is getting rid of anything and anyone that can stand up to them.

[–] PeripheralGhost@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 4 points 15 hours ago

Me too friend, me too.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Billionaires and making as much grifting as possible?

[–] PeripheralGhost@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] classic@fedia.io 2 points 9 hours ago

Hm. White power? Maybe god, too, because he comes with sweet donations from congregations

[–] PeripheralGhost@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Foreign policy....

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 15 hours ago

Id say money but they hate the IRS

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

If there's nothing to hold the country together, there's no reason for a union.

Why wouldn’t he? He’s faced zero opposition and his base feels safe and comfortable.

[–] geoff@lemm.ee 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Straight up just defunding schools.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Defund the police everyone goes crazy, defund the school system just another normal day.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago

Schools are a dangerous place for cops, what with all the guns and shootings going on.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

As outrageous as this is, it made me curious... for me, the Department of Education is just one of those things I've kind of always known about, but did you know that the current office and secretary was created in 1979? Under Jimmy Carter?

🤯

It's amazing how... recent... a lot of these cabinet positions actually are:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_the_United_States

Homeland Security - 2003 (that tracks)
Veterans Affairs - 1989
Education - 1979
(Previously "Health, Education, and Welfare") - 1953
Energy - 1977
Transportation - 1967
Housing and Urban Development - 1966
Health and Human Services - 1980
(Previously "Health, Education, and Welfare") - 1953
Labor - 1913
(Previously "Commerce and Labor") - 1903
Commerce - 1913
(Previously "Commerce and Labor") - 1903
Agriculture - 1862
Interior - 1849
Attorney General - 1789
Defense - 1947
(Previously "Secretary of War") - 1789
(Previously "Secretary of the Navy") - 1798
(Previously "Secretary AT War") - 1783
Treasury - 1789
(Previously "Superintendent of Finance") - 1771
State - 1789
(Previously "Secretary of foreign affairs") - 1781
Vice President - 1789

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is going to Help with that PESKY H1-B Visa problem!

[–] Today@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

And grocery prices

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 14 points 16 hours ago

This. Fuckin'. Guy.