this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
195 points (87.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

35766 readers
1838 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The left wing is gonna boycott the Harry Potter tv series cause of Rowling's transphobia, and the right wing is gonna boycott because Snape is black

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Snape is black? That's insane, everyone knows that Sirius is Black.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I kinda feel vindicated now. after the whole "dumbledore is gay" thing, I complained that it was bullshit and made absolutely zero sense.

the whole journey none of it came up once, nor did it progress his character arch at all. it was a bit of fluff that sold books.

it cheapened the struggles of being gay IMO and honestly makes more sense now than it did then considering what kind of a vile troll she is.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Dumbledore is gay but celibate. He fell in love with a guy and it blew up in his face and led to the death of his sister, after which he decided not to fall in love again. That makes me suspect Rowling is one of those people that thinks it's okay to be gay but not okay to act on it.

I thought it was fine in a "it didn't come up because it didn't and shouldn't have mattered" way.

[–] intheformbelow@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Overfixation on sexual identity issues is bad for trans people. Slow and steady progress is better than letting radicals steal the microphone. If you don't believe me, take a look at what Alberta and Saskatchewan are doing to trans rights. The only reason they are persecuting trans people is to spite the previous federal government whose performance was so lackluster that they resorted to identity politics slogans in order to appear "progressive". Trans people already have it tough. Using them as a banner instead of actually supporting them is going to make things even more difficult for them.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yup, the month has only begun but I've already bought a 2nd Order of the Phoenix to burn. Poetic, really.

I’ve already bought a 2nd Order of the Phoenix to burn

Weird, you should be able to burn the same copy over and over again. Just wait for the first one to reform from the ashes.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You bought it used right? Don't give her sales.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Pay her to burn her books. I'd guess she's fine with that deal.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not really down with burning the books, just that Rowling is using money from the series to fund a campaign against trans people.

I’m not going to spend money that someone is going to use to turn around and attack my rights with.

Like, if I was in the UK - it would be illegal for me to piss basically anywhere. Trans women are supposed to use the men’s, but because trans men are autistic self hating lesbians (the kind of shitty propaganda that bitch funds) we don’t exist and can’t piss in the men’s or the women’s.

I’m not very opposed to the mediocre children’s book series for their content - it’s just typical “the status quo is good actually.” I’m not going to give money to people who are using their money to hurt me.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I wouldn't want to give any money to her but I also wouldn't be opposed to purchasing HP books from a thrift store that donates funds to charity and then burning them just for the sake of removing just a little bit of her legacy from the world.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Can we please avoid "autistic" as an insult.

Edit: I get that this was hyperbole/satire but it still can hurt people's feelings.

I didn't read it as an insult. If it was, then "lesbians" was an insult, too. It sounds like OP's just using the hate-mongers' own words.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

That’s literally what they call trans men. That is the argument. We are all supposedly autistic, which means that we can’t be trusted to make decisions over our own bodies. That is constantly used to infantilize us, and will eventually be used to take away our ability to access transition.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't want to burn the books, just strip Rowling of ownership so she doesn't profit off of them any further is all. Maybe put them in the public domain early

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The problem with this is that if presumably the government had such power it wouldn’t just be used to silence hateful voices but also those who proclaim liberty and tolerance. The pendulum can only be given so much power when it swings both ways.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is why we should just wholesale abandon the concept of intellectual property, which is simply an extension of the exploitative private property system.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

How do artists get paid then?

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I feel this when someone from the left asks for licenses to have kids. Like you know, that swings the other way more often than not.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

If wishes were horses, beggers would ride.

One of this things is within your power; the other, isn't.

That said, burning her books only benefits her. If you want you hurt her, find someone who wants to buy and read them, and give them yours.

[–] GuardYaGrill@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

everyone's pretty much on board with burning Harry Potter books.

No they aren’t.

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

The displays at pretty much every bookstore I have been to recently are pretty massive. And kids still like the stories. It is hard to argue against a small child who is begging to read a massive book, as opposed to a kid wanting to stare at a screen all day.

[–] Fletcher 28 points 1 week ago

When you reveal yourself to be a bigoted, hateful person, most evolved and compassionate people tend to dislike you.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The setting is fun. The author is garbage. Also don't think too hard about the characters or the way different magical races are portrayed.

[–] Yermaw@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah if you start analysing it and paying the slightest attention with -phobias in mind the whole thing starts looking at bit sus.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When you pay the game you realize how few women and non-white characters there were.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I got threatened with a ban on Blahaj because I pointed out basically this when somebody posted a picture of a burning Harry Potter book. It wasn't even a criticism, it was just pointing out how funny life is that, for completely opposing reasons, trans people (and allies) and crazy Fundamentalists would both support what was happening in the picture.

The author (who was apparently a mod) made some comment about "hurr durr, mah both sides" and deleted my comment. It was very confusing, as my comment showed I clearly supported one of those sides (since I even referred to the Fundamentalists as crazy).

[–] pau_hana@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago

Megan Phelps-Roper did a great podcast exploring the reasons behind the backlashes against Rowling. The Witch Trials of J. K. Rowling

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Not surprised; Blahaj mods are pretty known for being ptb. Say one tiny thing they don't like and suddenly you're an [something]phobic bigot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago

"It's the work of the devil!"

Maybe they were right all along. 🤔

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not enough people. You still see people talking about it, citing their Hogwarts houses, playing the games, squeeing about news of the TV show snd so on as if nothing was amiss, and dismissing any concerns about the profits going to persecute trans people as some kind of weird Peta-tier puritanism. It’s still considered acceptable in the mainstream to be into HP and be accepted as a good person.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›