this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
224 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13965 readers
774 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 91 points 1 week ago

In Germany it is literally illegal to be this based

Also:

I think I smoked myself into an alternate reality

North Korea supported Palestine since 1966; you're only hearing about it now because the news thinks they're publicizing a bad thing

[–] LeninsBeard@hexbear.net 84 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The DPRK is far and away the most principled anti imperialist state in the world but craKKKers are so propagandized that this is somehow a surprise to them.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 59 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The DPRK is far and away the most principled anti imperialist state in the world

Kind of teetering between agreeing with this or saying the Yemenis are more principled (I mean there is some genuine outrage here and a desire to start a war over it): https://xcancel.com/Mont_Jiang/status/1949735269583732772

[–] corvidenjoyer@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe its vibes but I feel like the only things keeping the DPRK from following Yemen's lead is the distance and the fact that half of their country is still occupied by America. They could probably only really attack the entity effectively once. Remove any these two problems and I don't see why they wouldn't be involved at this point. (Maybe the still are somehow)

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Action is far more important. What Yemen does for the antiimperialist cause as a small nation is unmatched. You’re handwaiving the blood, sweat and tears of Yemen coming up against the entire West at the battlefront

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If we knew what the DPRK was doing to help Yemen and Palestine it would be a substantial opsec failure uncharacteristic of the DPRK.

I think logistics is more of the issue, but assisting the Russian SMO seems to disprove that the DPRK is all talk.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

We know that the DPRK has played an important role in Iran's missile development for a long time, and the Yemeni missile program is essentially an offshoot of Iran's. The DPRK is an important link in the chain enabling Ansarallah to do what they're doing.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I think this idea is unfounded. I'm all for the DPRK swinging like this, but they only swing like this because they are extremely isolated and this won't change that. If they were permitted to have more normal international relations, their tone would quickly shift (which is not to say that they'd become zionists, they just wouldn't be this aggro on everyone adjacent to their main opposition).

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

By this logic, the collapse of the USSR should have had the effect you're describing and indeed it did for many post soviet states.

The difference with the WPK is that they maintained their independence and were anti-revisionist and took great steps to prevent party takeover by bourgeois and liberal forces. The recent coup in SK did not lead to renewed relations for example even though the SK state now has a liberal govt. in power that wants to cool relations with the north.

If the DPRK had sanctions lifted it would have the same opinions because those opinions were materialist and revolutionary in nature. Kim Ill Sung started this, back within the USSR era.

extremely isolated

Not true anymore (or ever really): the DPRK has relations with numerous global south countries and has mutual diplomatic agreements with the RF.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Let me preface this by saying that I completely support the DPRK in its struggle against the west and the occupation of half of its nation, and will readily push back against any of the long litany of myths that have been pushed about it by imperialists seeking to spread misinformation. I have spent a fair bit of time researching these myths and found them to be substanceless a solid 98% of the time. I am not speaking from a place of opposing the DPRK geopolitically.

The difference with the WPK is that they maintained their independence and were anti-revisionist and took great steps to prevent party takeover by bourgeois and liberal forces. The recent coup in SK did not lead to renewed relations for example even though the SK state now has a liberal govt. in power that wants to cool relations with the north.

If the DPRK had sanctions lifted it would have the same opinions because those opinions were materialist and revolutionary in nature. Kim Ill Sung started this, back within the USSR era.

This is wishful thinking and redwashing of a kind that the DPRK itself does not even do. The DPRK is not "anti-revisionist"; it is in fact so divorced from Marxism that it would be more accurate to call it "not even revisionist." The Kims reject materialism quite explicitly, they reject the irreconcilability of class antagonisms, and while they pay tribute to Marx and co. on rare occasions, they have not pretended to be Marxists for decades, having helpfully struck those references from their constitution.

I think that this essay is a very good collection of statements from the Kims and the WPK to establish this ideological split: https://espressostalinist.com/2011/11/01/bill-bland-the-workers-party-of-korea-and-revisionism/

I have no interest in Bland's Hoxha-philia and I actually think he's harsher on the co-operative program than is justified from what I've been able to find about it, but I believe with the information he's laid out that his conclusions about the DPRK, including calling it revisionism and therefore, by the Lenin quote he uses, "against Marxism from within Marxism," is giving it too much credit, credit that the DPRK itself has refused over and over again, by calling it "within Marxism" at all.

Not true anymore (or ever really): the DPRK has relations with numerous global south countries and has mutual diplomatic agreements with the RF.

I said "extremely isolated," not "completely isolated." Relative to any country in the world of a similar level of development, various circumstances have prevented the DPRK from being able to engage in much more than communication, diplomatic visits, and the like with most countries, unlike its peers, who don't have the US and UN strangling them. It has always had some neighbors it was closely connected to, but many fewer than that of really any other country that wasn't also buried in sanctions, like Apartheid South Africa toward the very end of its existence (not that there is any equivalence between the two nations in other respects, obviously).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] axont@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago

I mean being anti-imperialist doesn't have to be a contest

[–] axont@hexbear.net 82 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Thr DPRK has never once acknowledged the Zionist Entity. They recognize all the land belonging to Palestine and Syria in the case of the Golan Heights. It's an absolute miracle of a country. Besiged on all sides, yet still they stand on the side of liberation for their entire history.

Uncritical support to the DPRK in its tireless resistance against the genocidal American empire. Uncritical support to the ideology of Juche and its implementation.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 45 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Some lib tried to tell me that they only do it to be "anti-american" and I was just catgirl-disgust

just being anti-american leads to the correct take like 99% of the time

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that they only do it to be "anti-american"

Not even a valid argument. If it were true I'd still support them for that as in general that is the right position to take. Very few times will it place you on the wrong side, especially with the US entirely gutting its few mildly benevolent manipulation programs like medical and food aid to the rest of the world you don't even have to contend with "b-buuut USAID gives starving people food, even if it is a front of the CIA and has had campaigns trying to overthrow the Cuban government". Because well now they don't. They've even gutted the few public goods they founded for their own imperial core citizens like PBS, very limited public healthcare/medicare, homeless assistance, etc.

And really why might the DPRK be anti-American? Anyone? Anyone? Yes it's because of the genocidal attack of the US against them in the 50s Korean war. Its because the west installed and propped up a dictatorship in the south and separated families for decades. It's because the US regularly conducts military "defensive drills" simulating an attack against a state they nearly destroyed but for the help of its neighbor that still has trauma from that and does not want the experience of fighting the Americans again. Meanwhile the north conducts no such drills. It's because they have been heavily sanctioned by the US and the UN at the urging of the US for decades. It's because they never got a formal peace treaty and are still technically at war with the country occupying their south.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bombs dropped by the US Empire and Occupied Korea killed 20% of DPRK's population and destroyed 85% of all buildings in the country, forcing DPRK's citizens to live in caves.

On 25 June 1951, General O'Donnell, commander of the Far Eastern Air Force Bomber Command, testified in answer to a question from Senator John C. Stennis ("North Korea has been virtually destroyed, hasn't it?"): "Oh, yes; ... I would say that the entire, almost the entire Korean Peninsula is just a terrible mess. Everything is destroyed. There is nothing standing worthy of the name ... Just before the Chinese came in we were grounded. There were no more targets in Korea."

No shit the DPRK hates the US, why the fuck wouldn't they?

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

Imagine being so incredibly self-centered that you think the entire government of a country gives a shit about some nobody Amerikkkan chauvinist’s fee-fees and strategizes based on how much it makes them angry

Liberals live in an alternate reality

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Besiged on all sides

The Chinese & Soviet/Russian borders are pretty chill tbf.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The DPRK benefited greatly from the Sino-Soviet split, as neither side wanted the DPRK to lean towards the other and so it received a good deal of resources and assistance from both sides to maintain its neutrality.

Most people don’t know that even after being bombed to hell during the Korean War, Japan and the DPRK were the two Asian economies hailed as the rising stars in the 1960s with very high level of industrialization and living standards, even before the rise of South Korea and Taiwan in the 1980s, and later in the 1990s, China.

Japan and the DPRK were the two Asian economies hailed as the rising stars in the 1960s with very high level of industrialization and living standards, even before the rise of South Korea and Taiwan in the 1980s, and later in the 1990s, China.

Kaplya said something about that... hm...

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

... and the DPRK were the two Asian economies hailed as the rising stars in the 1960s with very high level of industrialization and living standards

I would like to ask for a (preferably academic) source for when I have another altercation with anti-DPRK liberals.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

waow-based crush

Wasn't this always the case? The policy of unconditional support to Palestine was started by Kim Ill Sung. Anyway, people who support Palestine but not the DPRK are fraudsters who need TVs and social media to know when to support something (and I just described liberalism smh)

Anyway this seems fake in that this has always been the position of the DPRK and I can't seem to have an official source for this other than tabloids.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I sort of doubt it's a death penalty but yes the DPRK has always been against Israel

[–] refolde@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I sort of doubt it's a death penalty

If it's not, it really should be lmao.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the DPRK Zionists have to be such a nonsensical small group to believe that shit propaganda from such an outside perspective. I can't really imagine how someone growing up there would come to that position except by just hating everything about the DPRK with no principles at all

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Death penalty just for yeonmi-park and her ilk

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah I forgot about defectors like her.... I guess I should say that I can't imagine someone living their whole lives there becoming Zionists lol

The DPRK sent fighter jets to fight against Israel

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

Anyway this seems fake in that this has always been the position of the DPRK and I can't seem to have an official source for this other than tabloids.

Keep in mind that the news thinks they're revealing a bad thing; if they believed this showed the DPRK in a good light they wouldn't have mentioned it.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 49 points 1 week ago

DPRK has considered Israel to be an illegal state and it to be a satellite of the US since the 1980s. Every month or so, DPRK releases a press statement condemning Israel's war crimes. The last one I see posted was on July 6. I read the DPRK-hosted website almost every day.

The statement about DPRK implementing a new death penalty law for promoting Zionism seems like fake news. If such a law exists in DPRK, it wouldn't be a recent law as the instagram post is from July 15 and says "North Korea has passed a new law". I don't see it mentioned on any of DPRK's websites.

Below is an article from October 13 2023 from DPRK which says that the US is responsible for Israel's attack on Gaza. "The reality clearly proves that the U.S. is not a 'mediator' but a wrecker of Middle East peace and it is not a partner but a foe of Arab."

https://web.archive.org/web/20231013220121/http://kcna.kp/en/article/q/aa4df265dc7ce03ee512204d1071fd47.kcmsf

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago

The smugness in the comments internet-delenda-est

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Kim Jong-un on the Tucker Carlson show any day now lathe-of-heaven

[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago

Funny thing is libs will rage on him doing that like they did him interviewing russians but were quiet as church mice when their entire congress save 1 or 2 did standing novation for an ICC/ICJ criminal

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

how did the dprk manage to break the communist parent > lib child curse anyway? is this the power of juche?

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On 13 February 2017, the North Korean government assassinated Kim Jong-nam with the nerve agent VX in Malaysia after previous failed attempts to kill him.

The Wall Street Journal on 10 June 2019 reported that former US officials stated that Kim Jong-nam had been a CIA source.

Earned it imo

[–] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago

At the time they said he was assassinated for going to Disneyland Tokyo.

Turns out he was working for a country that is still officially at war with North Korea.

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

A child's emotional development seems to be most heavily dependent on their peers. So without the need to fit into liberal society to get their needs met that pattern breaks

[–] prole@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago

Not sure if propaganda by people who think this is bad or if it's just real

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least they’re giving him some credit instead of reflexively denying reality and concocting some bullshit reason why this is bad, actually.

[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

This should be the hexbearian headline the shock is nothing new

There are 31 countries that do not recognize Israel, so the DPRK does not stand alone.

Not in the news, but EU member Slovenia has banned all weapons trade by or thru their country. Isntreal is laughing it off, but other EU countries will now have to justify their continued weapons sales and set up new transport routes.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

kim-drip-too-hard stay winning

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago
[–] godlessworm@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

thank you supreme leader 🙏🙏🙏 a man with courage and conviction in a world full of lapdogs

[–] Comrade_Mushroom@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

The ignorance causes me actual pain.

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

Oh shit, bet?

load more comments
view more: next ›