501
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The former president fired off a series of potentially defamatory statements as he arrived in court

As he arrived at a federal courthouse in lower Manhattan, Donald Trump’s Truth Social account released an avalanche of posts attacking E Jean Carroll, who is suing the former president for defamation.

A jury in New York City will determine what damages he owes Ms Carroll, whom Mr Trump defamed by repeatedly calling her a liar and denying that he sexually assaulted her.

It’s the second trial stemming from defamation claims brought by Ms Caroll, and a jury already found him civilly responsible for sexually abusing her in the 1990s. He continues to claim that he never met her and has repeatedly mocked and ridiculed Ms Carroll in the wake of that verdict.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 203 points 5 months ago

And a huge chunk of the country somehow goes, "Yep, just what I'm looking for in November."

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A huge chunk of the country just down plays everything.

"OH, if it's really so bad why haven't I heard about it." I just told you mf'r.

"Trump is the victim in all this." Get fucked. In no way has that silver spoon orange cum rag ever been a victim in his life. We are talking about the person that is suppose to represent and lead umpteen million Americans and you're treating him with kid gloves.

"Innocent until proven guilty." He was proven guilty.

"It's only civil court, it's not criminal." Hold still while I shove this goalpost up your ass.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A survey done at the Iowa caucus asked "if Trump is convicted, would you still vote for him?". Only about a quarter of Republicans asked said no...

[-] saintshenanigans@programming.dev 14 points 5 months ago

1/4 of republicans splitting the vote pretty much means a free win for dems though. Don't let the irony of this election compared to the 2016 Bernie situation slide past you lol

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago

It's not a 1/4 who won't vote for him but a 1/4 who won't admit it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 130 points 5 months ago

So during a trial to decide damage amounts for previously made defamatory statements, you launch into a bunch of new defamatory statements?

Bold move cotton, we'll see how it plays out.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago

She can do this all decade long you stupid orange rapist. 5 Million. 20 Million. 100 Million. 300 Million. Keep it coming you idiot fuck.

[-] jeremyparker@programming.dev 36 points 5 months ago

If she's the one that breaks him we will finally have proof of the inmate goodness of the universe

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 39 points 5 months ago

"Inmate" lol

That's an amusing typo in this context.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

He is banking on the publicity that making the additional defamatory statements will give him with his voting base. He is hoping that his re-election will at the very least stall all the proceedings against him, and he may even be able to quash some of them after re-election.

The more forceful he is at his defense, the more his supporters dig in. He doesn't care about defying the court, because he hopes to make the court irrelevant.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago

The more forceful he is at his defense, the more his supporters dig in. He doesn't care about defying the court, because he hopes to make the court irrelevant.

Unfortunately the more I read from the right the more disturbing it is. I find they want blood and punishment for all the things they find wrong and they don't want to have to deal with anything complicated again.

The most convenient lies will do and there is no use for courts as they are not extreme enough. Faces must be eaten. Sadly it will be some of theirs too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 months ago

That or he's hoping one of his supporters will assassinate out of stochasticiam

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

You dropped this: (again)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago

Imagine if some country tries to stare us down while this guy is president.

We'll be a radioactive hole.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 104 points 5 months ago

It's way more likely that we get manipulated and taken advantage of. Other countries realize Trump is easily manipulated because he's a narcissist, and it'd be much simpler to stroke his ego while he opens our wallets .

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

If their leader is smart enough to manipulate us. I don't know that Kim is.

[-] Atom@lemmy.world 63 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He sure is. Remember he invited Trump across the border and told him he was the first president to come over. Trump bragged about that afterwords and talked about opening hotels on the NK waterfront.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nerdschleife@lemm.ee 30 points 5 months ago

He's smarter than Trump at least

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 15 points 5 months ago

Guys there's no need to imagine. He was already President for 4 years...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Art3sian@lemmy.world 68 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“You owe damages of $3M, Mr. Trump.”

“Well, she’s a nasty person.”

“You now owe $3.2M.”

“And a liar.”

“$3.5M.”

“She’s not even…”

“$4M.”

“This is horse…”

“$4.2M.”

“But I…”

“$4.8M.”

“You’re a nasty person, too.”

“$5M, Mr. Trump, plus you’re now in contempt of court. I can do this all day.”

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 months ago

And I'd readily watch that all day.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 5 months ago

He's campaigning. A large part of the country love this sort of behaviour and if it costs him a few mill well then donations will take care of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

When I read these things I am tempted to believe more and more that all hope in humanity is lost. I can't believe that our so-called allies in America are not able to recognize injustice and treat it the same way. Your society is finished - there is no other way to put it.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 months ago

Half of all Americans have an IQ under 95.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Stanwich@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

I honestly don't think it's possible for them to change. Their democracy is done. They are now a warning symbol to the world. I know I'll start looking into my own countries politics . I've been addicted to the shit show coming from the states. I do always wonder how more extreme it is in the news then what the average American sees.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

If he wins, we're done. No doubt about it. However, if we hold back the fascists this election (this includes the House and Senate,) there is a real chance at landing a huge defeat to maga extremism in '26 and '28.

Yes, you should be paying attention to your local politics: right wing extremism is on the rise everywhere.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's right. The USA are a good example of the downfall of a democracy. Even the most powerful in the world; and all that for no good reason - maybe pure greed or hybris or whatever; i can't make any sence of this. We can only learn from it. In any case, I am not prepared to accept this complete loss of any moral compass. A democracy should stand for all people. Not just for a few privileged ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

Defaming someone just as you're arriving at a trial to determine how much extra you're going to owe for defaming them again after already being fined for defaming them would be SUCH a badass move if it wasn't so stupid and coming from someone so vile..

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

He's shooting people in the middle of Fifth Avenue. Judge: What are you going to do about it?

[-] carbonprop@lemmy.ca 44 points 5 months ago

It would be amazing if the jury said jail time would be more effective than another monetary settlement. Fingers crossed.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

I don't think they have that ability.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 22 points 5 months ago

Just treat him like he was black. Charge him with contempt for anything, the way he is breathing is too loud, and set the bail for more than he can afford. $1.5 trillion?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 18 points 5 months ago

They don't have that ability in a civil trial, but could they say that? Something like "Here's the incredibly large amount of compensatory and punitive damages, which we still do not believe will suffice to prevent Trump from repeating this behavior. We believe that only detention will be successful in putting an end to this continuing defamation."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] carbonprop@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

I guess the only hope now is to try and bankrupt him…again

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago

Well when one is a professional Loser like Trunp, another bankruptcy is no big deal. It's par for the course.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Just start calling in the new jury on the campaign finance violations he's about to commit the second he has to pay the settlement. Those carry actual jail time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He lost another 2 lawyers. Is there a number out there, how many lawyers he had that were withdrawing? Many withdrawing only days/ a day before a trial, which a lawyer only ever does if they are deadly ill or their client is so unhinged that they can not risk being with them in a court room.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

He goes through lawyers like it’s dollar store bronzer

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

At this point i don't understand how he gets lawyers in the first place. Ok so maybe a few of them are crazy republicans, makes sense, but he has a wellnearned reputation for not paying his attorneys and I would think that would be enough to keep them from signing up in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nature_man@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

What is with all the leniency the courts are giving him? It feels like every month its "Judge orders Trump to stop doing thing he was ordered to stop doing several times already", if I acted that way in any trial I guarantee I would be charged for contempt of court

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They're trying to provoke the judge so they can have room for appeal or at least fodder for his mentally stunted base. "This judge was so mean to me, I couldn't get a fair trial." Especially if they can make the judge snap at them, then that's what it's about: an unhinged, emotional, hothead judge abusing their power.

Luckily I think most of the judges smelled him coming and are just giving him all the rope he wants. That's my hope at least. Then if they do jail him for contempt they've got stacks of evidence and second chances. I may be giving them too much credit.

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

When you're famous they let you do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Thank you, Iowa voters!

/s

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Just another reminder that Iowa voters are generally morons who back a loser more often than they pick a winner.

[-] jeremyparker@programming.dev 28 points 5 months ago

Counterpoint: losers of presidential elections have been president as often as not in the past 20 years

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

This should surprise nobody.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago

He really doesn't know when to shut up, hopefully that will be his undoing.

[-] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately that doesn’t seem to have been the case his entire life so far.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

In large part - perhaps exclusively - because corporate news is utterly incapable of saying the basic truth. He's a demented rapist fraud who can not stop lying.

They can't say that! They can't get close to saying that! And that is what gives him his rabid base.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
501 points (97.7% liked)

News

21700 readers
3148 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS