this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22848 readers
280 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally I'm going with micro crabs

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly like people but really buff and with spiky hair than changes color if they yell for like 3 episodes.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Is there any explanation for that? Like are saiyains and humans descendents of the same pan-galactic species?

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think hand lasers and biology have much in common

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The hand lasers are a trainable skill by any species in the dragon ball universe, everybody has ki.

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yes but my point is that it's not rooted in biology

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But for a certain value of biology, it is. Ki is the life force of all living things in the Dragon Ball universe, from grass and trees to dragons and gods, even androids. The biology of Dragon Ball is inextricably linked to ki and is not a natural biochemical phenomenon driving from physical laws like in the real world.

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

sure but I don't think Toriyama thought very hard about the biology

[–] booty@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Evolution doesn't exist in Dragon Ball, at least not as the origin of peoples. There are these gods called kais that have creation power, and they're bipedal humanoids, so they made various peoples vaguely in their image.

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

probably insects of some sort.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Considering that they are the most prolific lifeforms on earth this is a solid bet

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfathomable monstrosities.

Aliens would be from an independent line of evolution. Maybe trilateral symmetry dominated in their history. Maybe they operate at a different speed of thinking (10x faster or slower) so there's no way to communicate in a way that's natural for us. Maybe they're squishy on the outside. Maybe they're a colony of 5 different organisms and aren't symmetrical at all. Maybe they have nothing resembling a head. Maybe they'd look like goo to us.

We anthropomorphize aliens because we use them to tell stories about ourselves. Realistically they'd be nothing like us.

[–] CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To the extent that there are universal evolutionary "good tricks" for organisms to chance upon, there might be some similarities if we're talking about life forms with an intelligence "on par" with ours (however you measure it). Some examples might be having vision or vision-like sensory input and the organs for that located towards the top of the organism, some kind of appendage with the dexterity to manipulate and rotate objects, and something akin to Chomsky's whole bit about being able to recursively nest concepts and linguistic units inside one another.

[–] Comp4@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think Maoo is right in the sense that it is much more likely that aliens would look like giant shrimps and not like hot blue women. But sure you most likley need something to manipulate your environmnet with but that could be a tentacle and doesnt need to be a hand with 5 fingers.

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

A given hypothetical alien may have an entirely different chemical base or not be chemical at all in the sense we'd understand it. Their senses for, say, light, could be made from entirely different strategies.

To your point, look at octopus eyes vs. mammalian (or even fish) eyes. Both evolved independently with likely little more than light-sensitive patches of cells but ended up with similar "solutions" of an enclosed orb with a lens and light sensitive array of cells at the back.

But we should remember that our common ancestor was already highly constrained. Incredibly similar biochemistry. Bilaterals. Same strategy for being multicellular at all. General developmental patterns and mechanisms.

Aliens would share none of that with us. Look at the myriad precambrian body forms and then think about how every single one of them would've shared like 80%+ of the DNA we have. Aliens would share none of it.

So much of all of that is contingent on historical "accidents", just like hiccups are a behavior resulting from our fish ancestry that no longer applies or how mammals' urethra + penis is moved around during development makes penis-havers' lower abdomens more prone to hernias or how we're basically a big connected tube from mouth to anus going back to our ancestry as worms.

If you went back and replayed Earth's own life history and jostled some of the "accidents" it would go wildly differently. Different body plans winning out, different mass extinctions creating different opportunities for radiations of minority clades. Birds and mammals only exist in their currently recognizable forms and diversity because the most recent global mass extinction killed off the dinosaurs and a similar story applies to every global mass extinction. Imagine the conditions going in a different order.

Now look to aliens. Imagine they come from an environment where oxygen could be available because the chemistry of Earth's photosynthesis was not favorable. No mass extinction due to the rise of oxygen in the atmosphere, no oxygen-breathing animals. Who knows what they'd look like or how they'd form multicellularity or if they'd even be cells. We have no base of reference: our planet's life is the only example we know of. In fact, we might even be alone.

[–] GayTuckerCarlson@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter because they suck

I was abducted by aliens when I was younger. I asked them to give me a bigger hog but they just laughed and implanted a device in my skin that turned me gay. I've been on the search for aliens since then, if they can turn me gay, they can turn me straight

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

pfft, I can turn you straight. here, take some E

[–] raven@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet they're just funny little guys. Silly little guys. Funny silly little guys. With silly funny hats.

They're all just like Neelix vibin' you know?

[–] axont@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

All aliens talk like Wallace Shawn

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They look like Al Pachino in 1994. All of them. Everywhere. We're the only people in the whole universe that don't.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Too scary looks like I'll be having nightmares tonight

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Please tell your nightmares to be chill.

[–] Stoatmilk@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Like dog fursuits

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Crab people. I am sure they are crab people

[–] Sinistar@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

I bet they look just like humans but with weird shit on their heads.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

I think aliens look like big tanks of piss and they're gonna be real freaked out by how we just flush that stuff down toilets

They would look like the dudes from district 9 or something idk

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If aliens exist and are holding out on advanced gender transition technologies they're assholes.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Man, it would be so fucking awesome if they gave us that tech.

[–] voight@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

probably like hairy bugs

micro crabs is really good

[–] ForkBombRaja@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fish. I think they look like fish and live under the ocean of their home planet

[–] booty@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

broke: fish look like aliens

woke: aliens look like fish

[–] sammer510@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

I've always suspected that they wouldn't be bipedal because our whole design sucks. Our spines are bulshit and we have to wipe our own asses and we can't regrow limbs. I hope to one day see based crab people descend from the stars

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

a bipedal humanoid with hair and some wacky stuff skin features or horns on their face

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poriferans, but, like, sexy ones.

[–] Self_Hating_Moid@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Convergent evolution necessitates the existence of at least some sexy aliens

In fact what if sexy aliens are some kind of universal norm, and we're the ugly ducklings? Wouldn't that be some wild shit

Like shit, alien tech wear ain't touching my drip. Uniform but extremely pale complexion, like get some vitamins in your diet dumbass! No riz, I shouldn't have to explain this but 'hey, hello, how do you do, earthling? Could I interest you in an anal probe?' isn't exactly smooth. Aliens don't have a Bugatti (jank ass space frisbees are so uninspired), no ice or chains, their pad is probably sterile, they don't listen to jazz or hip hop, they don't game let alone even have a GameCube. They can vibe check you through telepathy but you can't vibe check their expressionless faces. If we're going off of the pic, it seems they don't have gender or genitals which is a W in some ways and an L in others, depending on your perspective. They're not sharing their technology with us, so they're clearly not comrades. Aliens suck, they're space incels.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How a Member of the Kingdom of Heaven might appear

source

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I always thought having 3 eyes with two on the ends of limbs would be a really interesting and complex perceptual biology.

[–] raven@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be really cool, but it seems like our sensory organs are all bunched up around our brain and probably for a good reason. Maybe they would have some secondary processing on their limbs like squids have in their tentacles?

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

The squid aliens in Arrival were pretty good compared to the humanoid ones commonly done in scifi. More invertebrate representation is good.

[–] robinn_IV@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Nothing like what we have imagined probably. Completely different conditions, and it’s seen as both narcissistic to think that humans are the most advanced species when it comes to technology and head-in-the-clouds nonsense to think they would be more advanced, like nearly all sci-fi goes with because it’s much more interesting.

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Little green men with antennae on their heads. They travel space in flying saucers and they have rayguns that goes pew-pew.

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A race that has cast off their mortal shell and has become a self sustaining machine collective or semi emotionally capable androids. Or crab people. sicko-crab they keep saying everything keeps evolving into crabs for some unknown reason.

Ewoks?

Dolphins said so long and thanks for all the fish.

I do have a leaning towards interdimentional beings probing us along side the whole other life in this plane. It would explain how things we see with reguards to UAP being silent, static, and moves in crazy speeds and only shows up in certain spectrums. Carl Sagan's FlatLand explaination is helpful for this perspective.

What we percieve as lines in the 1D and 2D might be what we look like to them. All this "the earth is flat" crap might be soft disclosure from the perspective of a 4 or 5 dimentional entity. When we do see their poking arounds, we only see slices of their stuff that appear to pop in and out of existsnce.

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I found YouTube links in your comment. Here are links to the same videos on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

Link 1:

Link 2:

[–] TheDialectic@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Given the witnessed incidents of intelegence evolving they are probably highly specialized fish, just like us.