this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
1006 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

10885 readers
3995 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 242 points 6 months ago (4 children)

"Wasted"? They're literally figuring out how the world around us works!

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If you ever want to do anything socially unacceptable, just say it’s for science.

[–] bored_boar_onboard@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Remember, we do what we must because we can.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's for the good of all of us, except the ones who had their legs clipped off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

I wonder what percentage of these weird studies that make us ask "why are they spending money on that?" are being done by students working on theses and doctorates and whatnot, and what percentage are non-scholastic institutions asking for government funds to see if you can teach penguins to French kiss.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To be clear this is probably someone's PhD thesis and they basically do it on their own dime with grants and such. It's not like the dod playing with bugs for some reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Limeey@lemmy.world 184 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Research for the sake of research is how we make discoveries we never thought possible.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 81 points 6 months ago

The best discoveries are the ones that start with somebody going, “Huh, that’s weird…”

[–] glouriousgouda@lemmy.myserv.one 54 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely! The mentality that it's "wasted time and resources" is exactly how you extinguish progress, invention, and ultimately the ability to innovate existing tools.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I remember listening to an NPR podcast and it was talking about wasting money in science. There was that "shrimp fight club" and millions being spent on it. Turns out the money was for a science lab and for students wages and just a bit of money went on the shrimp experiment. Didn't stop the headlines though. When the scientist went to explain the point to the politicians. They said that the shrimp shells were so resilient and lightweight and studying it could yield military benefits. The politician said that they would only care about that specific use case. The scientist had to explain you don't get one without the other.

[–] glouriousgouda@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 6 months ago

I freaking love that! And I have a feeling conversations like that happen pretty often, and I have to know if they are documented now!

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This one's not even that far out there. Understanding how ants think has direct applications! Ants must take many thousands of steps in a day; being able to count them precisely requires certain cognitive facilities we wouldn't otherwise know existed. Next step: figure out how those things work with such simple cognition. Then apply that to self-organizing robots and use them to cure cancer or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bubs@lemmings.world 71 points 6 months ago (4 children)

From an article I found online:

A team led by Matthias Wittlinger, a biologist at the University of Ulm, Germany, made modifications to desert ants [...]. After setting up an ant home outside the lab, the researchers let 25 ants take a 10-meter trip from their nest, then collected them. For one group, the team glued tiny stilts to the insects' legs. For another, they clipped the legs down to stumps. And for a control group they left the legs alone. Then the researchers gave each ant a piece of food and set it free. With morsels of food in their jaws, the ants immediately headed home. If desert ants do indeed use an internal pedometer, then the modifications should mess up their calculations.

Not only did the stilted and stumpy ants not make it home, but they also misjudged their distances exactly as the researchers predicted. The ants on stilts went about 5 meters too far before stopping to search for the nest, whereas the stumpy ants stopped about 5 meters too short [...] (Control ants got back home just fine.) After the modified ants were returned to the nest, they were able to go out and get back home just as accurately as normal ants, which should be the case if they're keeping track of the number of steps.

[–] Princeali311@lemm.ee 24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

But wait, the ants that were clipped, how did that work without painfully clipping their legs and how did they return them back to normal to go back home?

[–] Detheroth@lemmynsfw.com 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If these creatures can experience pain in the same conceptual way we do: they painfully clipped the ants legs and they didn't return them to normal. Those ants were in hell.

Else: it was painless and the ants still had stump legs for the rest of their existence.

Which is why the meme is "Haha funny tall ants are dumb" instead of the slightly less fun "Ants without legs are confused af"

[–] Princeali311@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

Well shit...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago

Get stilted losers

-Science

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

Science is basically journalism about the natural world. If ants have exposed themselves to a laughable scandal, it's only a matter of time before we've nailed their asses to a wall

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 25 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I’m not sure… ants walk really far. Think of how long it takes us to get human children to the point where they can count to 1000. Do ants just hatch with a sense of numbers?

[–] MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works 41 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I don't see why not. Storing a count is not so complex and the animal kingdom is filled with impressive (to our perception) mental feats* (like the dedicated neurones for each octopus tentacles).

Ironically, I find the act of following a pheromone trail counting steps way simpler than them having detailed mappings of their surroundings.

Edit: fears -> feats

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The next question is going to be what the maximum number of steps an ant can store is and what happens when it overflows...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] degen@midwest.social 12 points 6 months ago

I'm wondering if the "counting" could be derived from a form of proprioception rather than maintaining an active count. Distance just gets scaled and thrown off by longer legs.

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

You don’t need a sense of numbers, in the abstract mathematical way humans use, to count.

Maybe a human child can’t count to 1000 but they could be taught to put a BB inside a jar every step they take. Then they can take a BB back out of the jar at every step on the way back. When the jar is empty, they’re near home. Even if they can’t count at all, they can keep track of thousands of steps this way given enough attention span and stamina.

Then, just imagine, instead of a BB’s in a jar it’s some chemical signal in the brain.

[–] directive0@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Maybe its less like a number as we know it, and more like an ant poem or other mnemonic representation?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago

Quorum sensing does not require a conceptual framework of numbers. The conceptual framework is the harder part, your brain and many cells perform quorumsensing and computations all the time that you would find difficult to do by hand, or to do symbolically.

[–] Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Anyone else wondering how they even thought "Do ants count their steps?" To begin with ?

Let alone "Do ants count ?"

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 14 points 6 months ago

I immediately know why and its not about steps its about communication. How do the ants know how many steps to the food? its because other ants communicated it. Im 99% sure that is what the study was about. So there is a lot they are verifying. communication. mathematical concepts, how they parse distance. remember the foot is called that because it was sorta an average size of a foot. yard is basically a stride.

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or if they can even walk on stilts. I know if some aliens came down and attached stilts to my legs I would just lay down and die.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Same, but not before I bust my shit on the pavement and scrape my knees bloody. Fun times--for the aliens.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

Nah, the way ants can find their way around has been a favorite question of mine, and I know there's been a ton of people over lifetimes that have had curiosity about how exactly they navigate the world.

This answer, that they do count steps, makes more questions though. How do they count? Is it some kind of chemical reaction? Is it memory, are they counting in a way that we would recognize at all? Like, they could be fancy versions of those click counters bouncers use to keep track of how many people are up in the club, just some kind of chemical or mechanical tracker. It could be other methods that I can't think of because I know jack spit about ant biology at that level.

Reaching the specific question from "how do ants navigate" to "are they counting steps" isn't a big gap. I'm kinda surprised it took much time to get there tbh. Not sure when this experiment was done, but it's way easier than detecting pheromone trails or whatever else has been done.

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How do you determine an ant is confused ?

[–] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If you woke up with stilts on one day wouldn’t you be confused? Seems self-evident that ants would be too. Like, “I don’t remember going to bed with stilts on, wtf man, what was I on last night?”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.de 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But will you get an antswer?

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Will they be pedantic about it?

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Ped— ant— ic

Jesus, in a post about walking ants, this is the greatest word play ever.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I always assume they just left a trail of ant stank on the ground and everyone followed it to wherever the food was.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Different species of ants have different methods.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TC_209@hexbear.net 14 points 6 months ago

2024: "Pfft, look at these scientists wasting time and money figuring out if ants count their steps. Ridiculous!"

2124: "...and that's how the Ant-Step Computational Model allowed us to build the Warp Drive!"

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The second half of this experiment is far less wholesome:

To verify their findings, these scientists reran the experiment by cutting off ants’ legs at the knees. Those ants consistently undershot their targets, showing definitively that ants do actually count their steps.

So yay, verified results via torture!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] D61@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

On one hand... way to be assholes "scientists".

On the other hand... I didn't know technology existed that could possibly fix a broken spider leg and I need it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if they happen to use base 10?

[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'd guess base 6 with their 6 legs.

[–] ji59@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

I think they use base 1 because they have 1 "finger" on each leg

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I read ant bootie and thought of something ENTIRELY different

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Scientists should teach AI to be more like ants, maybe then it can finally do better math.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I hope someone glues stilts to their legs then. What. It’s for science. Because we can’t figure out a better way to study how scientists get stilts glued to their legs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Wasting budget and time? Grad students get paid?

load more comments
view more: next ›