this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
729 points (90.5% liked)

People Twitter

5230 readers
472 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works 101 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Where did she get that number? Where's the source?

Majorities of both men (61%) and women (64%) express support for legal abortion.

38% of men are against abortion, and 33% of women are against.

The numbers are pretty similar.

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/

[–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks, the story she was telling was counter-intuitive and without source. Hence, doubt!

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Those are different numbers, percentage of men who are against abortion and percentage of people against abortion who are men are not the same.

[–] rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works 57 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Doesn't matter. If you take those numbers, let's say 4 out of 10 men are against abortion, so you put them in a pile.

Then you take 3 out of 10 women against abortion and you put them in the same pile.

So now you have a pile with 4 men and 3 women who are against abortion. Which would mean 4/7 people who are against abortion are men. Which is 57%. Not 79% at all.

Either way. What's the source. Should always source your statistics.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

82% of statistics are made up on the spot. Everyone knows that.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

69% of the time, it works every time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ok, my first thought was "no way" but different areas of the country are different, so I was open to digging in. Looks like my gut was right, it's just more "alternative facts."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 98 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Honestly it's absolutely shocking that there are anti-abortion women at all tbh but it's also in the same country where half the country wants to elect an inept treasonous convict

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

there are a lot of women in jeebus camp who've been indoctrinated since birth to do what they're told by men. they argue that it frees them of the 'burden' of thinking for themselves and making their own decisions. because the belief that those things are too much work for a woman is part of the indoctrination

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Rich people know that they are exempt to most rules and sometimes they just want to impose them on others.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

100%

How many of these anti abortion politicians have sent their mistresses out of state for abortions, probably even pressuring or coercing them using their more advanced legal, financial, and social standings?

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago

Need babies for war

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Before Roe v. Wade were overturned I was critical about abortion, then we started hearing about all the trouble women go through and it shows how essential abortion is for reducing birth complications, even if it sounds illogical.

My main issue were when abortion was used as contraceptive, because at the time of abortion the body is increasing hormone production and then it's tough on the woman emotionally when the fetus is removed, but then I learn that in those states sex-ed is very limited and contraceptives can be hard to get hold of. And without sex-ed and contraceptives abortion is the only option left.

In light of all that I now know why we need abortion and feel like a fool for opposing it.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 69 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

because at the time of abortion the body is increasing hormone production and then it's tough on the woman emotionally when the fetus is removed

I applaud you changing your mind in face of new information, I just kind of want to nitpick that being forced to carry a pregnancy that you don't want to term is also going to be extremely physically and emotionally tough.

[–] kirbowo808@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 3 weeks ago

As a relative to a parent, who’s grandparents didn’t even want them but had to give birth to my parents, due to society stigma at the time, it honestly genuinely not worth it, esp with the amount of trauma my parent (dad) had to endure, due to not being loved and cared for, which has lead to further trauma extended to me too, due to unresolved pain. Abortion is a necessity. It saves lives alongside, helping people not suffer from further trauma and pain for the future for themselves and kids as well.

[–] sinadia@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m curious, is there ANY evidence of ‘abortion as contraceptive’ happening?

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I suspect it is one of those things that conservatives imagine being all over the place because in their communities where they would be shamed for becoming pregnant while unmarried and where contraceptives are hard to get that is how they imagine they would handle it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, sort of. In that in states that teach abstinence-only sexual education, there is a higher rate of teen pregnancy. I’m guessing you could extrapolate from that and find that teen abortion rates are higher, but I don’t have that data.

As I like to say to “pro-life” people: “Want to reduce abortion? Make contraception free and teach comprehensive sexual education.”

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the thing though. They aren't pro life. They are anti sex that they don't approve of.

Pregnancy is punishment for you having sex outside of marriage.

Which....tells you exactly what they think of women.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I also applause your willingness to change your mind based on new facts learned and please don't take this as an attack because it isn't, it's just a curiosity of mine. Did body autonomy not factor into your previous stance? I'm sure we both agree woman are perfectly capable of making their own decisions with their own body, why does anyone need to be involved in what they choose to do.

Tangentially related but I saw a state in the US basically made it so rapists could choose the mother of their children by both having abortion be illegal and making it so rapists could share parental rights with their victim. Essentially forcing the mother to be involved with their abuser. Shits crazy yo.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Regarding bodily autonomy, my previous stance were something like this: Abortion is a major decision and women should be counselled to make sure they know what they go into, and maybe try and convince them to keep it.

And that stance is probably fine if we lived in a perfect world where a few women got pregnant by accident, and it were the only reason for abortion.

But live in a world with: rapists, incest, teen pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, failing contraceptics, and many other reasons for abortion.

So I can only agree that the only way forward is full bodily autonomy.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

That's a fair enough stance even if I don't fully agree with it. I definitely agree with the counseling so people can make the decision that's best for them but I don't believe anyone should try and convince them one way or the other.

Thanks for giving me some of your time bud. Hope you have a good rest of your week.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

68% of people believe in made-up numbers. 71% even, if the numbers sound random enough.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is erasure of the like, 1 maybe 2, trans men that are anti-abortion

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I wish it was that few, but sadly trans people can have some really atrocious politics too. I doubt they're a significant factor on this particular scenario, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

trans men that are anti-abortion

Well, allow me to be inclusive and say that both cis- and trans men who oppose aborion deserve a very equal kick to the face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 27 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Though abortion isn't about men vs. women... It's more like everyone against some religuous bigots.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is far, far from only religious bigots who oppose abortion.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 9 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Is it? I mean I probably live in a different culture than most of the people here. I don't know that many people in real life who are opposed in the way I read from the news from overseas (or our more catholic neighbors). And what I've read that science has a differentiated stance on it. It's okay up to a certain point and consequences need to be factored in and weighed... What else are reasons to be strictly anti-abortion?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't really matter because the supermajority of Americans think abortion should be legal anyway. It's a small minority of the population that we have allowed to dictate domestic policy for their religious agenda.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's not even religious. Their religion says all kinds of really important shit that they completely ignore. They just pick this one specific issue because they hate women and it's a lot easier to say "Uhhhh it's because of my religion, you're discriminating against me!" than it is to say "I hate women and want them to suffer".

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh come now. They don't hate women, they just want to punish women for having sex outside of marriage because it's against...their... religion...

...hm.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Reminds me of how some at the GOP was making a joke that it makes no sense for women over 50 to even care about abortion rights cause it doesn't apply to them anymore.

Yet he saw no problem with him, as a man who can never carry a child, having an opinion on abortions.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

And of the women, probably 1/3rd of them are post-menopausal and won't have any more kids either

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Plenty of men support abortion - it removes financial responsibility from them, after all. Protests at abortion clinics are often held by women as much as men.

The more important demographic here is that most opposed to abortion are strongly religious.

Look outside the US and you'll see that countries that do support choice are less influenced by the Church. It's not coincidence.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago

And many of the men who oppose abortions, are massive fucking hypocrits who will gladly have their mistress get an abortion somewhere else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kd45@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

If men could get pregnant, there would be drive-through abortion clinics every 5 miles

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are definitely women with kids who are against abortion. Source: I know some of them.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 3 weeks ago

My sister in law with 8 children is "against it as a contraceptive" which I'm not convinced has been a thing for more than a handful of people that wasn't due to lack of proper contraceptive access and education, or mental disorder.

However she AND her religious husband have been "reconsidering" purely from the goodness of their hearts and surely not because the majority of their children are girls, the oldest of which is soon to be a teenager, I'm sure. Definitely not because now it affects their family directly...

And because I'm sure someone will get a giggle out of this anecdote, they forbid any sleepovers with BOYS because they don't want anyone "making purple", but) and completely dismiss the fact that their girls could decide they would rather make pinker pink.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I totally understand the point and I’m not trying to undermine, but I’m curious is this close to the actual ratio for 79%?

[–] SerpentPeaked@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

And to be pedantic, some men have uteri.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The percentage of trans men opposed to abortion is, if not precisely zero, a minuscule rounding error from it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sverit@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

But statistically 50% of the aborted fetuses will be male! Checkmate!

load more comments
view more: next ›