this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
950 points (91.6% liked)

Political Memes

7873 readers
2542 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] turnip@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

I love the hate the DNC gets now. I'm also confused how the DNC's mandate isnt to be entirely apolticial.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 7 points 15 hours ago

DNC will throw the election before putting a progressive into the race

[–] Tail11@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Gavin Newsom may sound smart, but he's got his hands in your pockets stealing your money to feed the rich, kinda like the current emperor in chief.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 2 points 11 hours ago

Newsom is a slaveholder

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Y'all know there's still house and some Senate elections coming up next year right?

You know what would show America and the Democrats (and Republicans for that matter) that Americans are finally serious about a 3rd party candidate? Supporting and electing 3rd party candidates in the House and Senate.

Ok, I try to be polite, and I generally agree you don't win arguments by saying shitty things, but whoever downvoted this is either a bad actor or has rocks for brains. I'm sorry to be so crass, but it needed to be said.

If only there were elections being held between 2025 and 2028 with less at stake than a presidential election. That way Americans on the left and right could come together and prove to the establishment parties that they would actually show up to vote for a 3rd party candidate for a presidential election.

Oh shit! I'm a total klutz and I dropped this list of states with Governor and AG elections between 2025 and 2028

OH NO! I fumbled and spilled this list of 33 of the 100 six-year term (Jan 2027-2033) Senate seats up for election on Nov 3, 2026.

Fuck, I'm such a butterfingers! There goes the list of midterm elections also on Nov 3, 2026 where representatives from all 435 congressional districts across each of the 50 U.S. states, as well as five of the six non-voting delegates from the District of Columbia and the inhabited U.S. territories will be chosen.

It would be such a shame if angry Americans used this information to get involved in local politics and promoted ethical candidates who weren't purchased by a corporation ASAP

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

What would a 3rd party look like? Only person that comes to mind is jill stein whos a russian mouthpiece

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

One that doesn't take corporate donations would be start.

Another method is 3rd parties forming locally as grassroots organizations and then forming a coalition party to back 3rd party candidates on the national level.

Sort of how you have a few caucuses in the Democratic Party like the Farm-Labor Part in Minnesota, or Independents who caucus with the Democrats like Bernie who could be peeled off to back a 3rd party of even just flatly Independent candidates.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago

Example of a 3rd party: The Democratic party refuses to back and fund AOC as a candidate. American citizens crowd source her campaign so she runs as an independent

[–] Tezzerets_Tea_Time@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Of course not. They can't accept that their most passionate base actually wants progressive platforms, not centrist pop pandering. Dems are too worried about being "safe" and trying to steal votes from conservative-centrists. If they actually showed bills and votes to invigorate the actual progressives, they just might get some loyal backing.

[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This is why the primary will be so important, and why Biden basically handed the win to Trump by pushing Harris instead of having a primary.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It shouldn't have mattered who the candidate was. When the opponent is an authoritarian bigot intentionally harming minorities you do whatever it takes in the moment to triage the situation and prevent generational destruction. Then you march/riot...etc and demand change from whoever the Dem president is. I blame the absent voters for ignoring the bleeding patient from the drunk driver accident and instead standing to the side demanding no more drunk drivers.

[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

Our entire system being like a hostage situation doesn't help, plurality voting is shit to begin with. I don't blame people.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Maybe, but the only way I can believe that is if we believe Biden was a far better candidate that Harris. Biden mopped the floor in the Democrats primaries everywhere they were held. Florida and Delaware were the only states that didn't hold them if I remember, and Biden had something like 87% of the votes for Democrats. We say they meaningless, but the last time the Democrats were in the same position was 2012 voting in an incumbent. Obama got 2/3rds the votes that Biden did. 8 million, vs the 12 million votes for Biden.

The delegates could have flipped when Biden left but didn't. Its a much higher likelyhood that there the issue was more people were not willing to vote for her for being a woman or being black. If people think that 1-2% of the voters aren't racist or sexist in Georgia, Michigan etc they are off their rocker. A 1-2% moved from Democrat to Republican vote was enough to lose states like that.

So if Biden had not run at all, and sent it to Primaries, would that percentage have been enough to get her not to win the primary? I kind of doubt it.

[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

AOC is a clear choice, I'd say Bernie but I'm already tired of old people in power.

AOC is young, in touch with actual issues, in touch with the generations that are moving the economy, knows the struggle since she used to be a waitress and so far I haven't seen her go crazy on anyone else's agenda or buying stocks and enriching herself beyond measure like damn old hag Pelosi.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

AOC《》Jon stewart

Bernie as whip

The dream team 😍

[–] Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Which is exactly why she wont be a presidential candidate ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly, you are correct. Neither Kamala nor Gavin can win. But I'd prefer Kamala to Gavin, which is how bad Gavin is.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

I prefer Gavin to Trump.

But not, you know, a lot.

That's how much I hate Gavin.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

We all like AOC here on Lemmy, but are enough of the old ass "liberals" going to join us so she can actually get elected? Seems highly unlikely to be honest.

I'd love to see it happen though. That's what primaries are for. The Dems should try one of those. It's been a while.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 6 points 17 hours ago

Bernie and AOC seem to be hoovering up the MSNBC liberal boomer demographic at this point because that demo has finally snapped and the dems leadership is completely absent.

That, however, probably won't translate into a progressive/socialist candidate winning the next presidential primary. They might have a stronger showing but dem leadership will move to protect their donors and stifle that candidate.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm 45. Am I old enough to be an old ass liberal? I love AOC and I hope she succeeds.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking 70's, 80's, and up. I'm also in my 40s.

[–] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

Aww shit 40s gang rise up!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Can we do ranked choice primaries?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

That would solve a lot of problems, so ... no.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The DNC would rather acquiesce power to Republicans than risk handing it to an anti-corporate candidate so... No.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world -5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

If it is not Bernie, AOC I ain't going to vote. Also ain't voting for anyone funded by AIPAC.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

--Maga fascist

load more comments
view more: next ›