this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
199 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2137 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 138 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Human piece of shit that will go wherever praise can be gotten.

Somebody really fucked this guy up.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 79 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I liked him in Forgetting Sarah Marshall where he played an unaware, easily hatable obnoxious prick. I felt like he really melted into that roll

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I liked him in Get Him to The Greek where he played an unaware, easily hatable obnoxious prick.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 1 points 13 hours ago

I hated that movie it felt unsettling for some reason

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He melted into that roll like a pad of butter.

That’s offensive to both butter and bread rolls

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

YOU SOUND LIKE YOU'RE FROM LONDON

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not wrong at all. It's like the only thing he's known for.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

Mar-a-lago, the new Epstein Island.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

God did. Brand converted to Christianity earlier this year and immediately began making propaganda videos promoting his new world views.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 4 days ago

Hmmm mar-a-lago (Trump/maga), steaks(maga), Christianity(maga)... Me thinks it's all connected somehow and none of it is genuine.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Don't blame someone else. He sexually assaulted women, he fucked himself up.

Omfg allegedly 🤮

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 103 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Potential consequences for rape is all it takes for someone to entirely give up on convictions.

  • One woman alleges that Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day. The Times says it has seen medical records to support this
  • A second woman alleges that Brand assaulted her when he was in his early 30s and she was 16 and still at school. She alleges he referred to her as "the child" during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship
  • A third woman claims that Brand sexually assaulted her while she worked with him in Los Angeles, and that he threatened to take legal action if she told anyone else about her allegation
  • The fourth woman alleged being sexually assaulted by Brand and him being physically and emotionally abusive towards her
[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 days ago

I didn't know any of the specifics of the allegations against Brand, but I remember when he did the crazy Jesus pivot I thought "it has to be something to do with kids." No scumbag flips that abruptly unless they've done something really bad.

[–] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 20 points 4 days ago

Those are all perks in team trump

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 52 points 4 days ago

Biggest sellout in history. I'm just glad I saw the writing on the wall long in advance when he would talk all the time about "community" but literally never engaged with it at all (the only time he even addressed commenters was when their comments were literally printed on paper and handed to him).

This man is the definition of a charlatan

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

To be fair, he hasn't wavered much on being rape-y.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 days ago

I have a bunch of friends who enjoy watching his content because he does highlight some honest questions about serious topics.

I have to keep reminding them ..... he's an entertainer and a celebrity ... he's not a journalist, researcher or trained academic

He will spit out whatever sounds right and say it loud enough, often enough, then slap a thumbnail of his surprised face on the video promo and people will watch it without any critical thought.

No matter how good someone may sound .... if you can't trust them, nothing they say is of any worth.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

It's funny how everyone who enters Trump's sphere abandons all previous principles. It's almost like he's surrounded himself with spineless rubes looking to get a position of power while agreeing to everything that he says.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if Brand had been accused of rape by other men if that would have made the difference. If Trump was accused of raping a male Wall Street banker instead of E. Jean Carroll, would that have smothered his candidacy in its crib? I honestly think it would have. Which is a sad thing to believe.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Probably not. Our culture seems to hold some remnants of roman homophobia and so if he'd raped men conservatives would've just been homophobic to the victims

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

So on Brand

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Russell Brand is a grifter?!? Whaaaat? How could he have changed so radically?!?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It started during COVID I think

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

This guy has always seemed like an asshole to me.

[–] JohnKeats@literatur.social 2 points 3 days ago

@Sunshine they never were vegan

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i think it's fun to refer to him as a "christian rock star". you know, because he's a christian with a rock and roll album.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's an insult to Christian artists who btw can be quite good. Josh garrels is technically Jesus music but goddamn dude for a voice.

[–] Sestren@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

No one defended Christianity, what I'm saying is their faith doesn't make their music lesser because of the whole bigotry thing. Right?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

at least the ketchup was vegan.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Jeebus eats fishes!