this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
117 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22821 readers
173 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like, in a practical sense? Do you have any stories or examples from your life?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doubledee@hexbear.net 77 points 6 days ago

The way it has manifested most clearly in the situations I've encountered it is a basic difference in approach to writing and reading as concepts. They don't see writing or reading as a way to communicate, they see it as a puzzle they have to solve by following rules, so that they can return to communicating once the puzzle is out of the way. Unless they're in very casual/online settings, or very motivated to find specific information, they avoid the puzzle because it's annoying.

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 67 points 6 days ago (12 children)

I have dyslexia and legitimately didn’t learn how to read until I was about 13 years old. I mean, I got by on memorizing clusters of familiar looking phrases. Vibes-based reading. Oh and lots of cheating and lying about homework.

Two decades later, I still struggle compared to my peers. But I have had the privilege and luck to learn strategies to make up the difference.

I’m also an elementary school teacher. There’s only so hours I can try to teach my students to read. One of the biggest determining factors for reading ability/comprehension is how much vocabulary children are exposed to at an early age (0-4 years old). Reading to young children is crucial for language development, reading ability, and a slue of related skills. I don’t know enough about linguistics to know this for sure, but I’m assuming most of my students have parents with restricted vocabulary. And probably just not talked to enough as babies. Something just has to have affected their kids cognition in pernicious ways. Them getting COVID 8 or 9 times in their lives probably hasn’t helped either.

So the other week with my fifth graders we’re doing intro geometry stuff. I said something like, “A cylinder is just like the rectangular prism. It’s just that its base is a circle.” And like okay, I’ve been trying for half an hour trying to distill the absolute cluster fuck this caused in my students brains.

“It’s similar to this coffee mug. See? It has a circular base and it’s a prism. I know you’re thinking a prism has to look like the rectangular prism. It might be helpful to think of the cylinder as a circular prism.” I said, exasperated.

“What are you even saying?” a child asks rhetorically.

I eventually have to say something like, “Listen, if you can’t understand this it’s a skill issue and kinda cringe.” There’s a million little things that are hard to put into words how utterly dysfunctional some of these kids brains are and will be later in life.

Oh and I have to speak to these children’s parents on the reg, which is its own sort of hell.

[–] theturtlemoves@hexbear.net 30 points 6 days ago (2 children)

To be fair, at least personally, I learned the word 'cylinder' long before I learned 'rectangular prism'. Maybe because the latter is usually called a cuboid or box, while there is no simpler word for a cylinder.

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 5 days ago

They know those concepts from previous grades and learning. My example leaves out weeks of scaffolding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago

Tell them prisms are where bad guys go; if they ran a prism, do they want their prismers to be in a cylindrical cell or a rectangular one?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 67 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I had a roommate who grew up in a poor farming community. He has dyslexia but the school had no special education funding to address that. As a result he grew up completely illiterate and stayed that way into his 30s. He passively absorbed libertarian ideas from the media he consumed, but lacked the ability to cross-check any of it. I remember him giving me a history lesson from a Call of Duty game.

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Jesus I’m so fucking glad that didn’t happen to me.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 39 points 6 days ago

I can talk humanities and social sciences at a graduate level and am comfortable with the physical side of trauma medicine, but STEM subjects are really difficult for me for more or less the same reason. Shitty public/Catholic schooling meant I effectively lost out on a meaningful primary and secondary science and mathematics education. Now I'm a scientific horticulturist because I thought horticulture was a fake science that I could sneak my way into because I'm decent with plants. It isn't though. Outside of ecology, it's the ultimate interdisciplinary physical science. I've had to learn mathematics through analytical trigonometry and calculus but even basic algebra barely makes sense to me. Chemistry and physics are totally lost on me. I spent those preteen/teenage years building an intuitive knowledge base for the subjects that interest me but I feel the effects of an underfunded public school with any kind of super technical field that I never had childhood exposure to. It fundamentally doesn't click.

[–] GrosMichel@hexbear.net 69 points 6 days ago (4 children)

That clip of that Kik Streamer fascist Aiden Ross trying to whole-word-read "fascist" and then googling the meaning and then still being puzzled why someone would call Trump that.

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 56 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Once, Andrew Tate asked him questions about World War II. I could maybe forgive someone for not knowing that de Gaulle was the leader of France, but the only leader of the major Allies/Axis Powers he knew was Hitler. When asked who the leader of Russia was, he said "I'm guessing Putin's father or grandfather".

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Putin's grandpa, Spiridon Ivanovich Putin, was Lenin's and Stalin's cook for some time, an we all know cooks really rule the world.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 30 points 5 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PointAndClique@hexbear.net 52 points 6 days ago

Kik Streamer

tory

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 48 points 6 days ago

When I first saw this, I laughed my ass off and then cried because this motherfucker is an idol to so many people.

[–] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 69 points 6 days ago

It means they are easily propagandized to and won't have the critical reading skills to realize it

[–] prole@hexbear.net 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Worked for a major insurance company in rural Alabama. Had customers who couldn't even write their own name, all of them were black people living in an incredibly poor area. None of them seemed particularly dumb or something, they just didn't have access to education because of segregation. This wasn't that long ago (2010ish), but a 70 year old today was school aged before desegregation in Alabama. Especially in rural areas that didn't enforce it for a while.

I think a lot of people ignore the effect this has on stats like this.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

But racism no longer exists we elected a black president!

[–] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 43 points 5 days ago

“We are in danger of producing an educated proletariat,” announced Reagan advisor Roger A. Freeman during a press conference on Oct. 29, 1970.

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 51 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They can sound out words and know what most common words mean in isolation but their ability comprehend the meaning of a text is very basic, if present at all. Reading a short story, being able to summarize it and comment on themes, conflicts, character motivations, metaphors, allegory, how they relate to the story or certain characters are generally beyond them. Reading a political article and reading between the lines to get past the writer's bias is completely beyond them (tbf they would never read an article, they would watch a video or look at memes on facebook). That said, they have little to no ability to think critically so whatever authority figures beat into them when they were young becomes their worldview and everything that contradicts it is seen as an attack on them and society.

[–] Doubledee@hexbear.net 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I had someone I know ask me what was wrong with the Korean PM declaring martial law since he was doing it because of a communist invasion. The article just repeated what he claimed he was doing and this guy hadn't thought about whether that was an accurate statement on his part. Just didn't occur to him that an official statement from a politician could be false.

He's not coincidentally a huge Chud with a lot of beliefs about a (((cabal))) running everything he doesn't like.

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I legit think the only way to save these people is to very carefully word socialist theory in a way that they can understand through facebook level memes. But then you have to worry about the authority figures that actually can read seeing through it. curious-marx I don't know that re-education is actually possible in this case, tbh.

[–] buh@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago

I legit think the only way to save these people is to very carefully word socialist theory in a way that they can understand through facebook level memes

Impossible, leftist memes must have multiple paragraphs of text at minimum

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The issue is also that these people actively do not want to learn, because learning actual history means learning that they are the bad guys. I think real re-education can only take place in a Chinese-style re-education camp (depicted wonderfully in one of my favorite movies, The Last Emperor).

[–] Moss@hexbear.net 35 points 5 days ago

This was what I was going to say. The idea of an author of a text having a bias is alien to a lot of Americans. Like if you say that Harry Potter is a liberal fantasy about not changing anything and defending the status quo, there will be someone telling you "uh no, it says in the book that it's about fighting Voldemort". Just a lack of ability to do anything more than a surface level read.

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 52 points 6 days ago

My mom once stated in a FB post that socialism was evil, when I asked her to elucidate "It just is!"

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 50 points 6 days ago

It means they have a difficult time parsing Parenti quotes. They can read it aloud, and they can tell you roughly what it's about, but they have difficulty following and comprehending the argument being made.

[–] Tom742@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Work emails have to be “dumbed down” to get co-workers to respond.

If I send the fully detailed email I want to, explaining what the situation is, what actions I need them to take and why, I get ghosted 9/10 and have to waste time getting their attention.

If instead I send one sentence emails I can at least get a response and back and forth conversation going. The majority of my co-workers have difficulty parsing anything more than like 2 paragraphs for relevant info.

[–] prole@hexbear.net 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I work on an app that's pretty complex and requires a lot of back and forth between devs, customers, and the people who do all the training/sales. I've had A LOT of success using numbered bullet points instead of writing normal sentences and paragraphs.

Something about the numbers makes them want to read it in order instead of skimming and it being broken down and labeled lets me respond with things like, "great, what about the 3rd bullet point?" Instead of having to repeat things. Plus most of my coworkers are in Texas so they love bullets.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

I have to agree hard with this, something about paragraphs says "chatgpt made this" and it's probably safe to assume it's long meandering non-sense stuffed with word salads, fluff, etc. and a bit at the end granting yourself an honorary PHD in early 1900s English literature. My friend even once told me they go off on unnecissary tangets and annecdotes that add nothing.

  • Bulleted lists are awesome
  • numbers aren't even necessary for most of the value
    • caveat: unless order strictly matters
    • nested bullet points are awesome for grouping sub-thoughts
    • my friend told me unnessary tangnts as nested bullet points are great because you can include them anyways but it's easier for fast readers to skip over in a safe organized manor.
  • still an info dump, but human parsable and navigatable
  • faster to go through, like an indexed database
  • Texas Delenda Est
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

"I used ChatGPT Bazinga to write this message"

Sometimes you have to be brought back to reality and realize that the vast, vast majority of USAmericans have not grappled with materialism, thus nearly all the connections they make are like a 6th grader writing out their 5 paragraph essay for the high stakes exam that determines if their school gets funding or not.

US self made brain drain is going to hit the country like a comically large boomerang, it already has essentially.

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, even if a person gets an undergrad degree they still have the capitalist brainworms unless they poison them with theory. Reading and writing education in the US is so formulaic as to be worthless. People are taught to follow a small set of rules and if they don't follow the rules, they fail. They are not expected to think. Even so, many people refuse to read or write anything, either paying others to do it for them or just turning in some AI slop without taking a single look at it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Siobhan@hexbear.net 27 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It means,,sadly, that the US education system is doing precisely what it was intended to do. Sigh

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 36 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Reading at a 6th grade level is reading for plot. Just like, what happened? Who was there? More advanced things like subtext, metaphor, and unreliable narrators come later.

I found this online the last time this topic came up: https://www.oxfordonlineenglish.com/english-level-test/reading

Go ahead and read the story, and imagine that a lot of people cannot read and understand it.

There's also this article about how many kids are taught to read badly: https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/ (amusingly, also available as a podcast)

What does it mean practically? Bad things. If you haven't read 1984, give it a go and think about why the authoritarian state benefitted from a diminished language.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

so lets go a bit more in depths on the topic, what other lessons did you get out of 1984?

[–] Vingst@hexbear.net 38 points 6 days ago

what other lessons did you get out of 1984?

that i should sport a mustache if i want to be taken seriously

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Aside from the seminal "Shake It Off" (which itself has been analysed by scholars to death), 1984 shows Taylor Swift's writing prowess with bars such as

"Now we got bad blood/ You know it used to be mad love."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blame@hexbear.net 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

their site design is knocking my reading level down a couple grades

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 26 points 5 days ago

Not GDPR compliant, the disagree button just says fuck you you must agree to our cookies to read this plain text

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I recently heard this from someone. Does anyone have a link to the recent research indicating this? My reflex is to be immediately suspicious of narratives along the lines of "everyone is stupid," especially in online communities with fringe political beliefs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

It means that a large part of my job is just copying and pasting things that have already been sent to clients because they straight up do not read everything they're sent even if it's just three or four sentences in a paragraph. This has gotten worse since Covid. Loads of these people are business owners, too. I can't imagine working for them, it must be a fucking nightmare.

edit: It also means a lot of clients balk at text communication entirely insisting that it's easier to explain something over the phone. Inevitably, the thing they absolutely needed to monopolize someone's time for can be expressed in a single fucking simple sentence.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 29 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Do you have any stories or examples from your life?

A middle school textbook is pretty basic stuff. Think of all problems, blunder, mistakes, accidents, etc happening all over the US every day that are caused by the average American having difficulty understanding anything written at a middle school level or above.

With the rise of the internet along with it's dark side and the expansion of right-wing media - maybe it was enviable that a repulsive republican like Trump would be president not just once but twice. And maybe it's no surprise that huge number of Americans fall prey to conspiracy theories and snake oil salesmen like RFK. A large percentage of Americans hate vaccines and think they cause disease.

My worry is that not only will the problem not get fixed - it will most likely get worse over time. There is a concerted, bipartisan effort to ignore the problem. The GOP likes an uneducated public. Trump even bragged about it. The democrats will remain unwilling to even acknowledge the problem because they think the public will lose faith in American exceptionalism, the American dream, etc.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 26 points 6 days ago

I find the OECD's levels of literacy more instructive than grade level. This page has a short definition: https://literacytrust.org.uk/parents-and-families/adult-literacy/what-do-adult-literacy-levels-mean/

pdf page 75 (table 4.5) here has more detailed definitions: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2019/11/the-survey-of-adult-skills_d7f1bc16/f70238c7-en.pdf

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 16 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I’m going to be honest, there was a ballot measure on this year’s ballot that I had to read and break down, and idk what my reading level is but it’s more than a 6th grader. I can see how the average person can easily get bamboozled with the way things like that are written.

[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

my first election as a snotty teen i had to learn what "eminent domain" meant in the booth, and of course despite taking and passing high school civics i had no conception of why it would be important.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] spacecorps_writer@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Years ago I wrote here using an alt about how I had yelled in public at one of my chud neighbors because he put a trump sign on his lawn. I stalked him later on facebook (which I no longer use) and saw his writing about the encounter. I could barely understand what he was even talking about. This is a white boomer who works as a school bus driver. Becoming a school bus driver now is super hard actually, it requires six months of full-time training/education where I live, but I suspect that he got into school bus driving before all of that, because his writing looked almost like he had just smashed his keyboard with his hands. No punctuation, many spelling and grammatical mistakes. I remember he wrote "I'm" when he should have written "I am"—it was something like: "He doesn't know how nice of a guy I am," but he wrote it "He doesn't know how nice of a guy I'm." This guy also speaks with a heavy accent and only in short, simple sentences. I've worked as an ESL teacher for years, and I tell students now—many of them are perfectionists—that they already speak English better than some native speakers.

I don't know what level his literacy is at. I guess he is barely capable of communicating in writing and also able to sign and cash checks and buy things at the grocery store?

Another story: I work in a blue collar field which requires us to enter about four houses each day. 95% of houses have absolutely no books at all. Of the remaining 5% of houses with books, the vast majority are only bibles and cookbooks. 1% has books that are mostly for decoration. Another 1% or so has books that appear to have been read. I have only found a handful of houses with communist texts. Most of the houses with books that seem to have been read are just filled with liberal nonsense. (One Mormon landlord I met, who owned so many houses I think he was confused about the number, had dozens of Mormon-themed books in his basement, including even one book about overcoming doubt about Mormonism.) A coworker and I once entered the very rare American house that seemed to have hundreds of books. My coworker (white, in his thirties, has a high school education at best) didn't even notice them. I guess I just found this stunning. I was fascinated with the books' existence and wanted to examine them all, even if they were almost certainly all liberal nonsense (the owners were retired academics, one book I remember seeing there was something like "Hitler and Stalin"), but my coworker was still just glued to tiktok on his phone (and not communist tiktok). He's actually an okay guy. He so desperately wants to be a normal American, but he has two trans kids whom he seems to love, so it's basically impossible for him to be as reactionary as he would like to be. I talked with him for about a hundred hours when we worked together, never revealing that I was a communist and always avoiding obvious Marxist language, and only made modest progress at best. When we finished working together a few months ago, he had expressed interest in voting for RFK. He had also never heard of long covid and seemed to be concerned about it when I mentioned it. Then he went back to normal. As for me, I have trouble watching videos to learn things because they're just too slow, sometimes even if I set them at double speed. I prefer reading, although I do listen to a lot of books and podcasts, although I'm usually listening while I'm doing something else. Not to denigrate learning from videos since I know they can be useful and some people really get a lot out of them (especially when it comes to learning blue collar shit), but in my opinion, a random book is going to have a lot more information than a random youtube video.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I would say I'm pretty smart, I have a job that relies on being intelligent and I excel at it.

My toddler and I are pretty much learning to read together. I didn't realize how much I stuggle to read, or at least read aloud, until I tried reading books to my son and it fucking rocked my world.

At first I thought the books were poorly written until I heard my wife reading a bunch of them without a problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›