this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
265 points (99.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13920 readers
1000 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Love the double fisting phones for extra recording.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

is red holding both? it's a little ambiguous

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah it could be the one on the right reaching around.

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 48 points 1 month ago

The ashes will nourish the ground and the house will finally be useful to society

[–] lil_tank@hexbear.net 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Breaking news : GOP announces radical climate action after slaver's house go down in flames

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] pumpchilienthusiast@hexbear.net 88 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bad if it was a museum. In reality, it was a country club 👍 👍

[–] mewbees@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's good that nothing of value was lost since it was a resort 🙂‍↕️

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago

This ruined a bunch of rich white folks wedding plans I'm sure

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] miz@hexbear.net 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Phlogiston

This is the sort of arcane bullshit i come to this site for

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Meh they tell you about phlogiston when teaching the history of chemistry in highschool

Not anymore lmao.

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I took chemistry in college and never heard of it

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why would college waste time explaining ancient erroneous hypothesis?

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm just saying they didn't give a second of instructional time to it in HS or college for me

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Aah, being "taught" the history of the atom theory probably did us more harm than good cuz we never got a definitive answer of how does that shit actually works if Bohr's model is bad too.

But everything was so half-assed and nobody gave a shit nor even the teachers than why bother mate

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

The answer is atomic orbitals by the way, although any actual explanation of the subatomic realm delves into quantum mechanics by necessity.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

Fucking hell why the fuck are you making me learn an obviously wrong model for fuck sakes

[–] Johnny5@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe Helps you spot modern erroneous hypotheses

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

My Molecular Biology professor spent a semester teaching us how shit got discovered with extemely pain-in-the-ass experiments that always used radioactive reactives and the mist imoortant take-away is that the times change and technology gets great but wetlab will always suck ass

[–] CupcakeOfSpice@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is that the shit where they thought they could spontaneously create life e.g. by putting straw in a cellar and miraculously rats will spring from nothing? Or was that the lumeniferous ether or something? My biology class talked about some weird shit in historical theories.

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

you're thinking of spontaneous generation.

phlogiston was a theorized substance related to combustion and luminiferous aether was a theorized medium for the propagation of light waves.

[–] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Phlogiston was a substance of negative oxidation. Combustibles lost their phlogiston as they burned, it was assumed, because the ash was much lighter than the original wood for instance. But this was all because the CO2 just dissipated. When measurements improved, it could be demonstrated that iron oxide weighed more than the original iron that rusted which disproved the phlogiston theory.

[–] The_Filthy_Commie@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Took me like 5hrs to suddenly realize that when I read ''Phlogiston'' earlier and had a moment.

My brain read ''Phlegethon''.

[–] schlongjohnson@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago

you love to see it

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago