this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
253 points (99.6% liked)

News

31495 readers
2613 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What if the gunfire causes an abortion? What if someone drops a frozen embryo due to the gunfire? What if a librarian accidentally orders a banned book due to the gunfire? What if the gunfire makes someone transexual?

We’re going to need some clarification here.

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hey, leave asking questions to Tucker, Putins buttbuddy

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a non american I'm getting this wild west vibe from recent guns legislation news.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

It's more Mad Max given the increasing incidents of road rage

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Hey America, how's it going?

...

Jesus Christ

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 year ago

This has to be the most deranged law in the history of laws. Murder being a crime is probably one of the few things you can count on everywhere if there's a working state.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is absolute insanity. Goddamn Louisiana republiQans are off the fucking rails.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Sword owners are being forgotten again, it's an outrage!

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hard to know all the details from this article, but it seems like they are raising the bar for civil suits as a result of an action with a firearm to the same level as a criminal action. Basically changing the standard from being a preponderance of evidence to beyond reasonable doubt.
https://thedefenders.net/blogs/preponderance-of-evidence/

So essentially, if you're found not-guilty after using a firearm in a self-defense situation, then you are also shielded from a civil action for that event.

This is probably in response to "robber sues homeowner after being injured while breaking into a house" stories that float around occasionally.

Heck, I could be way off base here, but that's how I read it.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All I can do is laugh and shake my head. This is insanity.

[–] tal 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think that what started this was the effort to go after firearms manufacturers -- who really don't have much to do with how a firearm is used -- for wrongful deaths. That got blocked back in 2005.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Lawful_Commerce_in_Arms_Act

So I figure someone looked at that law and figured "okay, extend to the person using the firearm".

Louisiana saw the attention Alabama was getting for making IVF illegal and got jealous so they made their own stupid law.

[–] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

License to kill

I wonder how something like that can be constitutional lol. Just take that paper and wipe your ass with it already :D Trump should issue a new constitution branded toilet paper, I bet the morons would buy it!