this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
159 points (99.4% liked)

news

23527 readers
782 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

michael-laugh I can't believe this is real holy shit

In a statement on Tuesday about the lawsuit, X’s chief executive, Linda Yaccarino, said: “People are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is constricted. No small group of people should monopolize what gets monetized.”

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 111 points 3 months ago

begging the judicial system to force firms to buy your services, this is the biggest brain of modern capitalism

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 67 points 3 months ago

Elon to advertisers, 2023: "go fuck yourself"

Elon to advertisers, 2024: :i-spil-my-jice: mods mods make them come back

[–] john_browns_beard@hexbear.net 66 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Early frontrunner for billionaire tantrum of the year 2024

[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 49 points 3 months ago

He's the greatest to ever do it. The Michael Phelps of billionaire ass-showing.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 64 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I’m gonna sue Walmart for not paying me… no your Honor, I have never been an employee of Walmart.

[–] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 67 points 3 months ago

It would be the other way around. They'd be suing you for shopping at their competitiors and thereby acting against your economic self-interest (as determined by Walmart.)

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Literally a plan that would be dreamed up by Ricky from Trailer Park Boys.

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The difference is that Ricky would actually be able to talk the judge into agreeing with him:

Your honour, I'm moving the court to sentence Mr. Lahey to pay me like a million dollars for being a drunk bastard and for not buying weed from me anymore. He used to buy all his weed from me but now that he's back on the liquor he doesn't smoke weed any more and that is fucked up. Your honour, I try to run a small business and now this drunk trailer park supervisor is violating all my human amendment charters.

[–] LocalOaf@hexbear.net 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Using the Canadian People's Freedom of Choices and Voices Act to force advertisers to buy ads to buy his hash coins and also pay him in hash coins

Simple supply and command

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ricky wouldn't be so litigious. He'd have to pay for a lawyer, most of which cost more than $12.35, some hash and six or seven sticks of pepperoni (pepperoni in this case being a local misnomer for what's really closer to a polish sausage, nova Scotia has weird food quirks)

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ricky doesn't need a lawyer. He represents himself and he does it well.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

Thanks to the people's voices and choices act or whatever the fuck ever

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 59 points 3 months ago

The LegalEagle about this is going to rip ass lmao.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 57 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Took me a minute to realize he wasn't trying to sue the planet Mars.

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 49 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All in due time, all in due time.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would have thought of the corporation sooner if it wasn't Musk and him suing a planet is for sure on the menu

[–] LocalOaf@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago

Suing the Roman god of war for making his planet too inhospitable and wiping out his Bazinga Colony in 2042

lathe-of-heaven

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

He’s suing Mars for being too difficult to land humans on, making him look stupid

[–] LocalOaf@hexbear.net 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

lathe-of-heaven

Musk relocates X to Tel Aviv and calls everyone that stops advertising on it anti-Semitic

[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is why Iran is waiting to retaliate. Trust the plan

[–] LocalOaf@hexbear.net 31 points 3 months ago

khomeini

Patriots are in control

[–] miz@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

nasrallah yavash yavash

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

I actually had a thought about how this could be a precedent that affects BDS. If Musk loses, maybe it can be used to invalidate laws against BDS too.

[–] porcupine@lemmygrad.ml 53 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I don't see how this is a meaningfully different argument than saying it's illegal to not buy things from "Israel", and US courts seem to be fine with that

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 35 points 3 months ago

They are discriminating against an african entrepreneur

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 26 points 3 months ago

I hope he tries to use that as precedence in the court cases, it would be so funny.

[–] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's meaningfully different in the US at least because these corporations are some of the most powerful on earth. Musk's companies are small beans in comparison because market cap is meaningless compared to actual revenue. He is fucking around with corporations that literally overthrow governments, kill disloyal people, and fund private militaries to advance their interests. The kind of corporations that US federal judges rubber-stamp even criminal rulings for.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_companies_by_revenue

[–] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because there’s a misconception about what BDS laws usually are. You as a consumer can boycott Israel. You can call for others to boycott Israel and do so as a group. You can own a business and refuse to buy things from Israel. And even the most reactionary court will take your side if a law was passed that did otherwise.

What most BDS laws do is to say if you are a government entity or do any business with the government, you cannot formally boycott Israeli products. Functionally this prevents a lot of businesses from boycotting Israel and critically, state universities too.

[–] autism_2@hexbear.net 44 points 3 months ago
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 42 points 3 months ago

Suing the other neighborhood kids for not hanging out in my treehouse

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He also said he's going to explore whether they're criminally liable under RICO.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This dude is actually going to anger other rich people for going after 'their' companies

He might actually start getting actively screwed by his compatriots now lol

[–] Antiwork@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the CEO of CVS got locked up for not advertising on X the everything website something would have def happened.

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

We're locked in to an extremely funny outcome here no matter which way it goes.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 38 points 3 months ago

I'm going to make these advertisers pay me money. my-hero

Uh, sir, that's called "extortion". ummm

No, it's called "business smarts" you're fired. melon-musk

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 38 points 3 months ago

He should challenge them to a fight

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 35 points 3 months ago

Now I'm convinced Musk really is a genius. To be capable of that kind of mental gymnastics he has to be.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 35 points 3 months ago

As soon as a lib talks about "the marketplace of ideas" you can safetly ignore anything they say because they're deeply unserious.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 33 points 3 months ago

I wonder if Elon pressured his lawyers to do this or if his lawyers are grifting him for hours or if they’re mutually stupid and both thought this was smart

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 32 points 3 months ago

Hoping he rolls a nat 1 on the Law check and accidentally destroys the ad industry.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 26 points 3 months ago

Free speech for me but not for thee

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They should countersue for ownership of Twitter. Then dissolve it if they win. Burn the office down and melt all the servers.

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago

This place is not a place of honor…no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here…nothing valued is here.

What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us. This message is a warning about danger.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago
[–] dirtybeerglass@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago

Fuck everyone who creates and perpetuates this removed

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago

lol, oh hell yeah Nationalize the Marketplace of Ideas

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago

It’d be funny if industry and trade associations ruled as anticompetitive under antitrust laws