They weren’t putting the image’s base64 encode on the blockchain or something like that? Just a URL?
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
217 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13800 readers
486 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
yes. It's too expensive to put the actual image on the blockchain so they just put the urls
immutable ledger my ass
theres no way its too expensive when youre paying over $1m for it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yep people were clowning on it from day 1 for this exact reason
Well, among other reasons you could also put exactly the same image onto the chain as often as you wanted because there's no actual relationship between the NFT functionality and whatever it was linking to or defining.
You could also copy and paste it for free
Yeah we all know right click save, but I feel it's a deeper critique that the asset itself can be infinitely reduplicated on the same chain because there's no guardrails or security or relationship between token and asset.
Moxie Marlinespike had a good bit where he sold nfts that would change to the poop emoji
load more comments
(4 replies)
tfw what you purchased was not an ape, nor an image of an ape, but a claim to a link to an image of an ape
Are we back to laughing at people who believe in IP now?
We never should have stopped
What if I call it the people's democratic intellectual property, is it cool now?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Right click --> save enjoyers vindicated again
hey its the thing that was extremely obviously going to happen happening
NFTs made me dislike humanity more as a whole. A large percentage of influencers were using them to scam the public.
They got funged
This is just like when my parents sold my beanie babies at a garage sale. Had my shit all figured out. The babies. Pokemon cards. I was gonna live large but look at me now
Pokemon cards are still out there selling for obscene amounts of money. Beanie babies, not so much.
(Image is legible when opened in new tab)
E) also, underrated subtle detail is the ex-husband representing himself vs the ex-wife who hired a lawyer for the "divvying up the stuffies" civil case
Maple the bear was the first to go
One of the worst #1 picks of all time. Like when the Clippers took Michael Olowokandi over Vince Carter, Dirk Nowitzki, and Paul Pierce in '98
load more comments
(3 replies)
This is one of the funniest things this site has shown me
I been keeping this one in my back pocket for years :smuglord:
If I were that judge I would quit on the spot. It would send me into an existential crisis about what this society is and how many years of education and training were undertaken for this moment.
well you are certainly not judge gerald hardcastle
https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/hardcastle-says-hell-quit-bench/
He drew controversy in recent years for his handling of the Brittney Bergeron case. He refused to grant Brittney's request to terminate the parental rights of her mother, Tamara Schmidt.
Authorities said the girls were stabbed in January 2003 by two Utah teenagers in revenge for a bogus methamphetamine deal orchestrated by the Schmidts, who were girlfriend and boyfriend at the time.
Brittney, then 10, was paralyzed from the waist down, and her 3-year-old sister, Kristyanna Cowan, was killed.
Hardcastle's decision was on appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court in February when Tamara Schmidt, still a prisoner, formally relinquished her parental rights and signed an open adoption agreement with the foster parents who have shared their home with Brittney for five years.
"This job is pretty hard on people, especially in Family Court," Kathy Hardcastle said Wednesday.
She said Gerald Hardcastle builds model ships for relaxation, and she still has one on display in her office.
https://lasvegassun.com/news/1999/nov/05/judge-plays-solomon-with-beanie-babies/
"This isn't about toys. It's about control," Family Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle told the couple. "Because you folks can't solve it, it takes the services of a District Court judge, a bailiff and a court reporter."
There was snickering among the five or six people in the gallery.
"I don't agree with the judge's decision to do this. It's ridiculous and embarrassing," said Frances Mountain, moments before squatting on the courtroom floor alongside her ex-husband to choose first from a pile of dozens of stuffed toys.
The courtroom was silent for about three minutes while the two took turns picking babies.
There was snickering among the five or six people in the gallery.
lmaooooooooooo
In contrast: I imagine the lawyer was having a great time billing for this.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
You see any of those videos where adult children were storming costcos to fight over a pallet of cards? Just omg living in this country is a daily humiliation ritual
load more comments
(3 replies)
'rare'
Extinct
I want them to sue and be ruled against because the URL to the dead jpg still exists.
Legally you only own an entry in a distributed ledger that contains the value "https://dumbassclub.scam/18e67ddf-8469-404c-9820-0eab4631c905.jpg".
It's not even really clear if you own that much. What rights would ownership of an entry in a ledger even confer?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
he forgot about his slurp juice
this is what happens when you don't use multiple slurp juices on one ape
Now that they don't exist, the law of supply and demand demands that my NFTs are infinitely valuable
:cassandra-flummoxed:
> trend has obvious flaw
>
> flaw leads to inevitable conclusion
> surprise
Such a simpler time. When a Paris Hilton could go on Jimmy Fallon and show him her ape. It aged like bejeweled Von Dutch trucker hats.
load more comments
(3 replies)
man spends a million dollars and cant be arsed to encode the image in the blockchain
I was having a bad until I read this post
Even if you did the good old "right-click, save" trick them as the owner and you still have your image on your hard-drive, if the link is dead then you can't prove that your specific image of a baboon's ass is linked into that nft that is supposed to be worth X amounts of fiat.
push me to the ETH
all my apes are dead
most logical economic system
Should have used the slurp juice smh
Probably should have just downloaded the image.
This is such an obvious thing to happen, I can't spend a hundred bucks without looking into it, let alone a million
Oh, this person is genuinely sad about this and big into crypto and username is literally NFT “PicturesOnBlockchain”. The cognitive dissonance has not hit them that the whole thing is a grift and this isn’t a single solitary unfortunate incident.
rare
wym "rare" you can literally reupload the same picture into a new NFT
Lmao get rekt
How can crypto broes not taking advices from the goldbugs that if the assets is worthless if you don't own it tangibly
view more: next ›